한국판 토론토 마음챙김 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구
The Study of Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Objectives: In this study, we examined the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (K-TMS), a brief self-report measure to assess state mindfulness. Methods: We administered the K-TMS, Beck Depression Inventory, Experiences Questionnaire (K-EQ), Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) to 205 university students and conducted exploratory factor analyses (EFA), confirmatory factor analyses, and correlation analyses among the related variables. Results: The K-TMS demonstrated high internal consistency, and its corrected item-total correlations ranged from .37 to .73. Exploratory factor analyses resulted in a two-factor solution (curiosity,de-centering), based on an examination of the scree plot and eigenvalues, which was structurally similar to the original TMS scale. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a correlated 2-factor model, with correlated error terms, showed an adequate fit to the data. The K-TMS was positively correlated with de-centering (r=.304, p<.01), as measured by the EQ, with reflective self-awareness (r=.334, p<.01), as assessed by the K-RRQ, and with positive affect (r=.302,p<.01), as assessed by he PANAS. There were no significant relationships between the K-TMS and depression, and the correlation between the K-TMS and the MAAS was not significant. Conclusion: These results show the K-TMS is a promising measure of mindfulness state, with good psychometric properties. Further study of the relationship between the K-TMS and mental health is needed.
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we examined the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (K-TMS), a brief self-report measure to assess state mindfulness. Methods: We administered the K-TMS, Beck Depression Inventory, Experiences Questionnaire (K-EQ), Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) to 205 university students and conducted exploratory factor analyses (EFA), confirmatory factor analyses, and correlation analyses among the related variables. Results: The K-TMS demonstrated high internal consistency, and its corrected item-total correlations ranged from .37 to .73. Exploratory factor analyses resulted in a two-factor solution (curiosity,de-centering), based on an examination of the scree plot and eigenvalues, which was structurally similar to the original TMS scale. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a correlated 2-factor model, with correlated error terms, showed an adequate fit to the data. The K-TMS was positively correlated with de-centering (r=.304, p<.01), as measured by the EQ, with reflective self-awareness (r=.334, p<.01), as assessed by the K-RRQ, and with positive affect (r=.302,p<.01), as assessed by he PANAS. There were no significant relationships between the K-TMS and depression, and the correlation between the K-TMS and the MAAS was not significant. Conclusion: These results show the K-TMS is a promising measure of mindfulness state, with good psychometric properties. Further study of the relationship between the K-TMS and mental health is needed.
참고문헌 (21)
- Hanh TN, "The miracle of mindfulness: a manual for meditation" (1976), Beacon
- Kabat-Zinn J, "Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life" (1994), Hyperion
- Martin JR, "Mindfulness: a proposed common factor", J Psychother Integr, 7, pp.291~312 (1997)
- Teasdale JD, "Prevention of relapse", recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, 2000, pp.68, 615~623
- Brown KW, "The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being", J Pers Soc Psychol, 84, pp.822~848 (2003)
- Baer RA, "Mindfulness training as a clinical Intervention: a conceptual and empirical review", Clin Psychol: Sci Pract, 10, pp.125~143 (2003)
- Segal ZV, "Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression" (2002), Guilford press
- Brown KW, "Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects", Psychol Inq, 18, pp.211~237 (2007)
- Carmody J, "Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program", J Behav Med, 31, pp.23~33 (2007)
- Fresco DM, "Relationship of posttreatment decentering and cognitive reactivity to relapse in major depression", J Consult Clin Psychol, 75, pp.447~455 (2007)
- Bishop SR, "Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition", Clin Psychol: Sci Pract, 1130, pp.230~241 (2004)
- Lau MA, "The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation", J Clin Psychol, 62, pp.1445~1467 (2006)
- 조용래, "정서조절곤란의 평가: 한국판 척도의 심리측정적 속성", 한국심리학회지 임상, 26(4), pp.1015~1038 (2007), 한국임상심리학회
- Watson D, "Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales", J Pers Soc Psychol, 54, pp.1063~1070 (1988)
- Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring depression", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 4, pp.561~571 (1961)
- Lee YH, "A Study of the Reliability and the Validity of the BDI, SDS, and MMPI-D Scales", Korean J Clin Psychol, 10, pp.98~113 (1991)
- 김빛나, "탈중심화가 내부초점적 반응양식과 우울증상에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2008
- 전종희, "한국판 마음챙김 주의 자각 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 예비 연구", 한국심리학회지 임상, 26(2), pp.201~212 (2007), 한국임상심리학회
- Trapnell DP, "Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection", J Pers Soc Psychol, 76, pp.284~304 (1999)
- 박성현, "마음챙김 척도의 개발", 박사, pp.2006
- Reis HT, "Daily wellbeing: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness", Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 26, pp.419~435 (2000)