일대학 대학생 및 교직원의 정신건강의학과 개명에 대한 웹기반 조사
Web-Based Survey of University Students and Faculty Members on Renaming of Psychiatry
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 정신건강의학과로의 개명에 대한 인식도를 대량 이메일 설문 조사를 통해 조사하였다. 그 결과 일반대학생들은 여전히 정신질환에 대한 편견이 존재한다라고 생각하고 있었다. 설문 응답자 대부분(90.8%)은 정신건강의학과로의 개명 사실에 대해 인식하지 못하고 있었다. 그리고 정신건강의학과로의 개명에 대해 호의적(92.7%)이었으며, 정신질환의 치료의 문턱을 낮추는데 도움을 줄 것이라고 생각하였다. 그렇지만 보다 젊은 층에서는 실제로 치료를 받을것이라는 비율이 나이 많은 군보다 낮게 측정이 되었다. 이는 정신질환자는 취업에서 불이익이 있을 수 있다는 생각과,보험 가입 등에서 실제적인 차별이 있을 것이라는 인식에기인할 수 있다. 이를 개선하기 위하여 향후 정부나 학회 차원에서의 적극적인 편견 퇴치 운동 및 보험 정관에서 정신질환자에 대한 불합리란 제한이 해소될 수 있는 등의 실질적인 보완책이 필요할 것으로 생각한다.
Abstract
Objectives: Psychiatric patients had less access to psychiatric care due to a stigma associated with psychiatric care. However there have been numerous efforts to break down the stigma. One of them was to change the name of the discipline to Mental Health Medicine, which was established nationwide in August, 2011. Authors try to understand the change of concepts by according to the change of the name of psychiatry. Subjects consisted of undergraduate and graduate students, and university faculty members. Methods: The survey was conducted by the Kyung Hee University mass e-mail system. Mails were delivered to the undergraduate and graduate students, and university faculty members. The contents of the survey consisted of questions regarding awareness of the name change (psychiatry->mental health medicine), positive or negative impressions of the name change, psychiatric history, and eligibility of access to the psychiatric clinic. Results: Most respondents were not aware of the name change (90.8%), however they generally responded to the changed name positively (92.7%). Also they responded that by changing the name, the possibility of the easy access to psychiatric treatment would be expected. The undergraduate students group, the graduate students group, and the below 22 year old group responded more favorably to the name change compared to the faculty group and the above 22-year-old group. They also responded positively to the improvement of easy access to psychiatric treatment. However, regarding the effects of the name change on deciding to receive the psychiatric treatment, only small numbers were agreed to accept treatment. Conclusion: This survey showed that the less-than-22-year-old group, undergraduate students group, and graduate students group thought more positively to the name change (psychiatry->mental health medicine) compared to the group of more than the 22 years old and the faculty group. However, only small numbers of those groups answered that they can visit and receive psychiatric treatment when they are needed. One of the reasons they are reluctant to receive psychiatric care is due to the concern of the discrimination in employment and insurance coverage. Campaigns against stigmas for the psychiatric care via the proper method and time are needed nationwide, and should be enhanced. Practical policy should be re-established.
참고문헌 (23)
- 서미경, "정신장애인에 대한 일반인의 스티그마와 정신장애인이 지각하는 스티그마의 비교 연구", 신경정신의학, 44(3), pp.371~375 (2005), 대한신경정신의학회
- 한경례, "정신분열병 환자의 낙인에 영향을 주는 요인", 신경정신의학, 41(6), pp.1185~1196 (2002), 대한신경정신의학회
- Fabrega H Jr, "Psychiatric stigma in the classical and medieval period:a review of the literature", Compr Psychiatry, 31, pp.289~306 (1990)
- Ministry of health & welfare, "Replace 10 kinds of prejudices about mental disorders", J Korean Neuropsychiatry Assoc, 40, pp.7~ (2000)
- Kim SW, "The Analysis of Newspaper-Articles on Psychosis", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 39, pp.838~848 (2000)
- Kommana S, "Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia", Psychiatr Serv, 48, pp.1393~1395 (1997)
- Williams M, "Mental illness: media perpetuation of stigma", Contemp Nurse, 4, pp.41~46 (1995)
- 서미경, "지각된 낙인이 정신장애인의 삶의 만족과 자아존중감에 미치는 영향", 한국사회복지학, 56(4), pp.173~194 (2004), 한국사회복지학회
- Link BG, "A modified labeling approach to mental disorders: an empirical assessment", Am Sociol Rev, 54, pp.400~423 (1989)
- Ministry of health & welfare, "The Epidemiological Survey of Psychiatric Illnesses in Korea 2006" (2007), Ministry of Health & Welfare
- 안동현, "정신건강의학과로의 개명이 우리에게 주는 것?", 신경정신의학, 49(6), pp.533~537 (2010), 대한신경정신의학회
- Lim KY, "Presented at the public hearing on “Renaming of Psychiatry”" (2005), Catholic University
- Lee JH, "Presented at the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association’s public hearing on “Renaming of Psychiatry”" (2008), Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
- Ahn DH, "The The benefits of renaming of Neuropsychiatry", The Korean Neuropsychiatric association newsletter. 2011 Aug 25;Scet 1, 3, ~ (2011)
- Sato M, "Renaming schizophrenia: a Japanese perspective", World Psychiatry, 5, pp.53~55 (2006)
- Takahashi H, "Impact of changing the Japanese term for “schizophrenia” for reasons of stereotypical beliefs of schizophrenia in Japanese youth", Schizophr Res, 112, pp.149~152 (2009)
- Sabshin M, "The Future of psychiatry, In The american Psychiatric Press Textbook of Psychiatry", pp.1693~1701 (1999), American Psychiatric Press, Inc
- Kim KH, "Health care utilization and quality levels of depressed patients" (2009), Health insurance review and assessment service
- Korea association of medical colleges, "Surveys of mental health of medical college students" (2007), Korea association of medical colleges
- 김우재, "일 대학 대학생의 우울증 인식도 및 우울증 지원프로그램 수요조사", 대한불안의학회지, 6(1), pp.55~64 (2010), 대한불안의학회
- Kongsved SM, "Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions", J Med Internet Res, 9, pp.25~ (2007)
- Ritter P, "Internet versus mailed questionnaires:a randomized comparison", J Med Internet Res, 6, pp.29~ (2004)
- Yang KM, "A comparative analysis between the online survey and written questionnaire", Chung-ang Management Review, 26, pp.21~38 (2000)