본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

농촌 마을 유형에 따른 농촌공간 재구조화 및 재생 추진 전략 우선순위 분석

Priority Analysis of Rural Space Restructuring and Regeneration Strategies Based on Rural Villages Types

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

This study aims to prioritize the restructuring and revitalization strategies for rural spaces based on the characteristics of different types of rural villages. Using the Delphi Hierarchy Process (DHP), which combines the Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this research evaluates the key strategies for three types of rural villages: basic residential, agricultural, and urban-rural exchange villages. The results indicate that, for basic residential villages, improving residential and living conditions, as well as delivering essential services, are the top priorities. In agricultural villages, economic revitalization and landscape/environmental management rank highest, while urban-rural exchange villages prioritize community vitality enhancement and economic activation. At the sub-factor level, basic residential villages focus on developing hub villages, improving housing conditions in vulnerable areas, and creating an attractive residential environment for population influx. In agricultural villages, tailored support for full-time farmers, the introduction of smart agriculture technologies, and the establishment of regional agricultural industry clusters are emphasized. Urban-rural exchange villages prioritize creating shared spaces, supporting urban-rural connectivity, and job creation. This study provides valuable insights into differentiated strategies for each village type, offering a foundation for future rural restructuring and revitalization plans, especially in the context of government policies for sustainable rural development.

Abstract

This study aims to prioritize the restructuring and revitalization strategies for rural spaces based on the characteristics of different types of rural villages. Using the Delphi Hierarchy Process (DHP), which combines the Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this research evaluates the key strategies for three types of rural villages: basic residential, agricultural, and urban-rural exchange villages. The results indicate that, for basic residential villages, improving residential and living conditions, as well as delivering essential services, are the top priorities. In agricultural villages, economic revitalization and landscape/environmental management rank highest, while urban-rural exchange villages prioritize community vitality enhancement and economic activation. At the sub-factor level, basic residential villages focus on developing hub villages, improving housing conditions in vulnerable areas, and creating an attractive residential environment for population influx. In agricultural villages, tailored support for full-time farmers, the introduction of smart agriculture technologies, and the establishment of regional agricultural industry clusters are emphasized. Urban-rural exchange villages prioritize creating shared spaces, supporting urban-rural connectivity, and job creation. This study provides valuable insights into differentiated strategies for each village type, offering a foundation for future rural restructuring and revitalization plans, especially in the context of government policies for sustainable rural development.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Yang, H. S., "A study on the management of landscape for rural sprawling development", J. Environ. Impact Assess, 30(5), pp.305~316 (2021)
  2. Lee, S., "Stakeholder Awareness of Rural Spatial Planning Data Utilization", Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 29(3), pp.25~37 (2023)
  3. Sung, K. H., "Sustainable Rural Development and the Risk of Village Extinction", Rural Development and Policy Studies, 15(1), pp.56~78 (2022)
  4. Rhee, Z., "Rural Spatial Reconstruction as a Sustainable Development Strategy : Policy Implications", Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 29(3), pp.45~61 (2023)
  5. Yun, J. -M., "Development and Application of Village Extinction Index in Rural Areas-A Case Study on Chungcheongnam-do", Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 29(3), pp.15~24 (2023)
  6. Chai, J. -H., "A Study on the Determination of Investment Priorities of Rural Areas Development Projects of Local Government Considering Local Finance", Journal of Korean Regional Development, 27(1), pp.185~206 (2015)
  7. Song, H. J., "A study on developing diagnostic indicators for rural village landscape planning", Journal of Rural Planning, 15(2), pp.123~145 (2014)
  8. Ju, S. -H., "Analysis of Success Factors of Local Food and Policy Implications", Journal of Local Government Studies, 19(3), pp.291~315 (2015)
  9. Park, J. H., "A study on policy evaluation indicators for rural landscape management", Journal of Rural Landscape Studies, 10(4), pp.67~89 (2016)
  10. Yoon, H. K., "A study on cultural-based rural development strategies", Journal of Regional Development, 40(3), pp.58~82 (2021)
  11. Noh, S. H., "Analysis of the components of quality of life for rural residents : An AHP approach", Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22(1), pp.77~99 (2021)
  12. Kang, W., "Prioritization of Han River tourism resource development policy", Journal of Tourism Studies, 38(2), pp.113~137 (2022)
  13. Lee, B. J., "Evaluation of relative importance and priority in rural area development projects", Journal of Rural Development, 21(1), pp.45~63 (2022)
  14. Choi, M. S., "An exploratory study on rural resilience indicators", Journal of Rural Geography, 14(1), pp.33~52 (2022)
  15. Hyung, C, "Analysis of Priority Factors for Rural Economic Development Using AHP: Comparison of Revitalization Status and Potential of Rural Areas in China", Doctor, Department of International Trade and Economics, pp.2023
  16. Dalkey, N. C, "The delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion, delphi and decision making" (1969), D. C. Helath & Co
  17. Saaty, T. L., "Transport planning with multiple criteria : the analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review", Journal of advanced transportation, 29(1), pp.81~126 (1995)
  18. Anderson, D. R., "Strands of system: the philosophy of Charles Peirce" (1995), Purdue University Press
  19. Khang, Y. H., "An application of the Delphi method to the assessment of the current status of cancer research", Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4(31), pp.842~856 (1998)
  20. Lawshe, C. H., "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel psychology, 28(4), pp.562~575 (1975)
  21. Nunnally, J. C., "Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders", pp.97~146 (1978)
  22. Jin, Y. Y, "A Comparative Study on the Priority of Factors Influencing Automobile Purchase Decisions of Chinese and Korean Consumers Using AHP", Doctor, pp.2022

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)