정신보건심판위원회 계속입원치료 심사지침 평가
Assessment of Continuing Hospitalization Judgement Guideline in Mental Health Review Board
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives The aims of this study are to test the applicability of the continuing hospitalization judgement guidelines of The Primary Mental Health Review Board and to provide the basic data for the development of valid guidelines. Methods The request sheets submitted to Cheongju Primary Mental Health Review Board for continuing hospitalization from April 2009 to July 2001 were reviewed. The results according to the guidelines were compared with board’s final decision. The aim in making these comparison was to determine the factors affecting the board’s decisions. Results Cheongju Primary Mental Health Review Board assessed 1223 requests during the period, and declined 65 of those requests. The sensitivity and specificity for dissent of the algorithm in the guidelines are 51.6% and 97.0%, respectively. The patterns of data in the sheets from the mental facilities were different from the psychiatric hospital or the clinic. The presence of a guidance’s signature, mental status, and specialist’s opinion could be factors affecting the board’s decision. Conclusion The result suggests that distinguished guidelines are needed for mental facilities. Social support systems and functional impairments may be meaningless because they did not affect the board’s decision or could be replaced by other factors. The algorithm and judgement system should be revised to increase sensitivity for dissent. Further research is required concerning the development of standardized guidelines on the judgement for continuing hospitalization.
Abstract
Objectives The aims of this study are to test the applicability of the continuing hospitalization judgement guidelines of The Primary Mental Health Review Board and to provide the basic data for the development of valid guidelines. Methods The request sheets submitted to Cheongju Primary Mental Health Review Board for continuing hospitalization from April 2009 to July 2001 were reviewed. The results according to the guidelines were compared with board’s final decision. The aim in making these comparison was to determine the factors affecting the board’s decisions. Results Cheongju Primary Mental Health Review Board assessed 1223 requests during the period, and declined 65 of those requests. The sensitivity and specificity for dissent of the algorithm in the guidelines are 51.6% and 97.0%, respectively. The patterns of data in the sheets from the mental facilities were different from the psychiatric hospital or the clinic. The presence of a guidance’s signature, mental status, and specialist’s opinion could be factors affecting the board’s decision. Conclusion The result suggests that distinguished guidelines are needed for mental facilities. Social support systems and functional impairments may be meaningless because they did not affect the board’s decision or could be replaced by other factors. The algorithm and judgement system should be revised to increase sensitivity for dissent. Further research is required concerning the development of standardized guidelines on the judgement for continuing hospitalization.
참고문헌 (18)
- O’Donoghue B, "Involuntary admission from the patients’ perspective", Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 45, pp.631~638 (2010)
- Rain SD, "Perceived coercion at hospital admission and adherence to mental health treatment after discharge", Psychiatr Serv, 54, pp.103~105 (2003)
- Bae JK, "A field survey on actual performance of local government for mental health (in Korean)" (2006), National Human Right Commission of Korea Research Report
- 이명수, "정신보건심판위원회 퇴원명령 대상자 추적조사", 신경정신의학, 48(1), pp.42~47 (2009), 대한신경정신의학회
- "Mental Health Act" (2008)
- 강상경, "정신보건심판위원회의 운영실태 및 개선방안", 정신보건과 사회사업, 28(28), pp.297~315 (2008), 한국정신보건사회복지학회
- Kim CJ, "Problems and solutions of mental health policy (in Korean)" (2007), Sourcebook of Government Inspection
- 홍진표, "정신보건법의 입퇴원 규정 및 관련법 고찰", 신경정신의학, 49(2), pp.157~162 (2010), 대한신경정신의학회
- Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Standard judgement guideline for continued hospitalization (proposal)" (2009)
- Chung IW, "The study on development of standard guideline for the judgement of hospitalization in people with mental illness" (2001), Ministry of Health and Welfare Research Report
- Chung IW, "A study on the judgement for hospitalization of the mental health judgement boards", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 42, pp.520~527 (2003)
- Myers DH, "Mental health review tribunals. A follow-up of reviewed patients", Br J Psychiatry, 170, pp.253~256 (1997)
- Adams SJ, "Who applies to regional review boards and what are the outcomes", Can J Psychiatry, 42, pp.70~76 (1997)
- O’Reilly RL, "Why are patients discharged by review boards", Can J Psychiatry, 44, pp.259~263 (1999)
- Monahan J, "An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders", Psychiatr Serv, 56, pp.810~815 (2005)
- Regional Chairmen of the Mental Health Review Tribunal for England and Wales, "Guidance for the preparation of medical reports for the MHRT" (2000), London: Mental Health Review Tribunal Secretariat
- Egleston P, "Improving the quality of medical reports to mental health review tribunals", Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, pp.215~218 (2002)
- O’Muirithe B, "An audit of the quality of reports to Mental Health Review Tribunals", Med Sci Law, 48, pp.221~224 (2008)