단일기관 소아청소년 입원 환자에서의 항생제 피부시험 현황 분석
Current practice of antibiotics skin test in pediatric inpatients: A single-center experience
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Routine practice of antibiotic skin test (AST) before administering antibiotics is with little scientific basis. However, AST is frequently performed in real-world practice. We aimed to explore the current practice status of AST. Methods: All admission cases in Severance Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020 of patients at less than 19 years of age were collected retrospectively. AST results for 4 penicillins (ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam) and 6 cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefotiam, cefpiramide, ceftriaxone, and flomoxef) as well as adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports were collected. Results: Among 36,381 hospitalization cases, 7,589 and 16,468 were administered penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. Penicillins were administered without AST in 2,622 cases (35%), 2 (0.08%) of which showed ADR. Of the remaining 4,967 cases who received AST, 57 (1.1%) showed a positive reaction. For cephalosporins, 15,473 cases (94%) received antibiotics without AST. Among them, 17 cases (0.1%) showed ADRs. For 995 cases that rceived AST, 22 (2.2%) revealed a positive reaction. Among 79 cases who were AST positive, 10 took the original medication. Conclusion: The current practice of AST reveals heterogeneous and inconsistent patterns. This brings the need for a standardized guideline for the safe and effective use of antibiotics.
Abstract
Background: Routine practice of antibiotic skin test (AST) before administering antibiotics is with little scientific basis. However, AST is frequently performed in real-world practice. We aimed to explore the current practice status of AST. Methods: All admission cases in Severance Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020 of patients at less than 19 years of age were collected retrospectively. AST results for 4 penicillins (ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam) and 6 cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefotiam, cefpiramide, ceftriaxone, and flomoxef) as well as adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports were collected. Results: Among 36,381 hospitalization cases, 7,589 and 16,468 were administered penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. Penicillins were administered without AST in 2,622 cases (35%), 2 (0.08%) of which showed ADR. Of the remaining 4,967 cases who received AST, 57 (1.1%) showed a positive reaction. For cephalosporins, 15,473 cases (94%) received antibiotics without AST. Among them, 17 cases (0.1%) showed ADRs. For 995 cases that rceived AST, 22 (2.2%) revealed a positive reaction. Among 79 cases who were AST positive, 10 took the original medication. Conclusion: The current practice of AST reveals heterogeneous and inconsistent patterns. This brings the need for a standardized guideline for the safe and effective use of antibiotics.
참고문헌 (21)
- Doña I, "Trends in hypersensitivity drug reactions : more drugs, more response patterns, more heterogeneity", J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 24, pp.143~153 (2014)[DOI]
- Park Ji Soo, "Drug Allergy in Children: What Should We Know?", Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics, 63(6), pp.203~210 (2020), 대한소아청소년과학회[DOI]
- Torres MJ, "Controversies in drug allergy : beta-lactam hypersensitivity testing", J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 7, pp.40~45 (2019)
- 이소희, "The Current Practice of Skin Testing for Antibiotics in Korean Hospitals", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 25(2), pp.207~212 (2010), 대한내과학회
- Executive summary of disease management of drug hypersensitivity : a practice parameter, "Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology", Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 83, pp.665~700 (1999)
- Solensky R, "Penicillin allergy evaluation : a prospective, multicenter, open-label evaluation of a comprehensive penicillin skin test kit", J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 7, pp.1876~1885 (2019)
- Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, "Drug allergy : an updated practice parameter", Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 105, pp.259~273 (2010)
- 손성욱, "항생제 피부반응시험 양성인 경우 변경 항생제 분석", 천식 및 알레르기, 31(1), pp.48~54 (2011), 대한천식알레르기학회
- "Korean guidelines for skin testing of antibiotics in patients with immediate type hypersensitivity reaction" (2012)[URL]
- Narayan P, "Skin testing before antibiotic administration-is there a scientific basis?", J Assoc Physicians India, 67, pp.63~65 (2019)
- 김성렬, "사용 전 베타락탐 항생제 피부시험의 유용성에 대한 전문가 의견", Allergy Asthma & Respiratory Disease, 10(1), pp.3~8 (2022), 대한 소아알레르기 호흡기학회[DOI]
- Romano A, "Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams-an EAACI position paper", Allergy, 75, pp.1300~1315 (2020)
- Brockow K, "General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity", Allergy, 57, pp.45~51 (2002)
- Yang MS, "Incidence of cephalosporin-induced anaphylaxis and clinical efficacy of screening intradermal tests with cephalosporins : a large multicenter retrospective cohort study", Allergy, 73, pp.1833~1841 (2018)
- Sousa-Pinto B, "Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Allergy Clin Immunol, 147, pp.296~308 (2021)
- Stone CA Jr, "The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy", Allergy, 75, pp.273~288 (2020)
- Li PH, "Beta-lactam allergy in Chinese patients and factors predicting genuine allergy", World Allergy Organ J, 12, pp.100048~ (2019)
- Blumenthal KG, "Risk-based pathway for outpatient penicillin allergy evaluations", J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 7, pp.2411~2414 (2019)
- Macy E, "Safely diagnosing clinically significant penicillin allergy using only penicilloyl-poly-lysine, penicillin, and oral amoxicillin", J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 1, pp.258~263 (2013)
- Savic L, "BSACI guideline for the set-up of penicillin allergy de-labelling services by non-allergists working in a hospital setting", Clin Exp Allergy, 52, pp.1135~1141 (2022)
- Castells M, "Penicillin allergy", N Engl J Med, 381, pp.2338~2351 (2019)