본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

NMR-based Metabolomic Responses of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) by Fipronil Exposure

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류화학

초록

Fipronil, the phenylpyrazole insecticide, is effective and used in various fields. Especially, fipronil was reliable because it was known to be specific on invertebrate animals than vertebrate animals including mammals. However, fipronil had potential risks that affect vertebrate animals as it blocks the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors that also exists in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Therefore, it was necessary that harmful effects of fipronil on vertebrates are clarified. For this purpose, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) were used on behalf of vertebrate animals in present study. The zebrafish were exposed to 5 µg/L, 25 µg/L, and 50 µg/L of fipronil during 12, 24 and 72 hours. To closely observe toxic process, 12 hours and 24 hours of additional time point were set in the exposure test. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics is an approach to detect metabolic changes in organism resulted from external stimuli. In this study, NMR-based metabolomics showed the metabolic changes in zebrafish caused by fipronil exposure. Metabolic analysis revealed that fipronil interfered with energy metabolism and decreased the antioxidant ability in zebrafish. Antioxidant ability decline was remarkable at high exposure concentration. In addition, metabolic analysis results over time suggested that reactions for alleviating the excessive nerve excitation occurred in zebrafish after fipronil exposure. Through this study, it was elucidated that the adverse effects of fipronil on vertebrate animals are evident. The risk of fipronil on vertebrates can be no longer ignored. Moreover, this study has a meaning of practically necessary research for organism by examining the effects of fipronil at low concentrations existed in real environment.

Abstract

Fipronil, the phenylpyrazole insecticide, is effective and used in various fields. Especially, fipronil was reliable because it was known to be specific on invertebrate animals than vertebrate animals including mammals. However, fipronil had potential risks that affect vertebrate animals as it blocks the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors that also exists in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Therefore, it was necessary that harmful effects of fipronil on vertebrates are clarified. For this purpose, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) were used on behalf of vertebrate animals in present study. The zebrafish were exposed to 5 µg/L, 25 µg/L, and 50 µg/L of fipronil during 12, 24 and 72 hours. To closely observe toxic process, 12 hours and 24 hours of additional time point were set in the exposure test. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics is an approach to detect metabolic changes in organism resulted from external stimuli. In this study, NMR-based metabolomics showed the metabolic changes in zebrafish caused by fipronil exposure. Metabolic analysis revealed that fipronil interfered with energy metabolism and decreased the antioxidant ability in zebrafish. Antioxidant ability decline was remarkable at high exposure concentration. In addition, metabolic analysis results over time suggested that reactions for alleviating the excessive nerve excitation occurred in zebrafish after fipronil exposure. Through this study, it was elucidated that the adverse effects of fipronil on vertebrate animals are evident. The risk of fipronil on vertebrates can be no longer ignored. Moreover, this study has a meaning of practically necessary research for organism by examining the effects of fipronil at low concentrations existed in real environment.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Y. Wang, , Chemosphere, 88, pp.484~ (2012)
  2. Ş. Gül, , Environ. Int, 30, pp.605~ (2004)
  3. P. Mineau, , Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 21, pp.1497~ (2002)
  4. A. S. Gunasekara, , J. Pestic. Sci, 32, pp.189~ (2007)
  5. A.,Aajoud, , J. Agric. Food Chem, 51, pp.1347~ (2003)
  6. M. W. Dryden, , Vet. Parasitol, 93, pp.69~ (2000)
  7. A. M. Hosie, , Br. J. Pharmacol, 115, pp.909~ (1995)
  8. Y. Ozoe, , Pest Manag. Sci, 57, pp.923~ (2001)
  9. A. Bobé, , Pestic. Sci, 52, pp.275~ (1998)
  10. D. Hainzl, , Chem. Res. Toxicol, 11, pp.1529~ (1998)
  11. L. M. Cole, , Pestic. Biochem. Phys, 46, pp.47~ (1993)
  12. T. Narahashi, , Pestic. Biochem. Phys, 97, pp.149~ (2010)
  13. X. Zhao, , J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther, 310, pp.192~ (2004)
  14. K. Haya, , Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 8, pp.381~ (1989)
  15. S. Beggel, , Sci. Total Environ, 426, pp.160~ (2012)
  16. M. Kitulagodage, , Ecotoxicology, 20, pp.653~ (2011)
  17. P. R. de Oliveira, , Exp. Toxicol. Patho, 64, pp.569~ (2012)
  18. C. M. Stehr, , Toxicol. Sci, 92, pp.270~ (2006)
  19. P. C. Das, , Chem. -Biol. Interact, 164, pp.200~ (2006)
  20. C. Vidau, , Toxicol. In Vitro, 23, pp.589~ (2009)
  21. R. A. Ardeshir, , Toxicol. Rep, 4, pp.348~ (2017)
  22. G. Kari, , Clin. Pharmacol. Ther, 82, pp.70~ (2007)
  23. Y. Wang, , Chemosphere, 168, pp.1571~ (2017)
  24. X. Wang, , Sci. Rep, 7, pp.1~ (2017)
  25. Y. Liu, , Sci. Rep, 7, pp.1~ (2017)
  26. C. Wyatt, , Eur. J. Neurosci, 42, pp.1746~ (2015)
  27. "OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: Fish, Acute Toxicity Test, Guideline 203", ~
  28. S. Tiziani, , Neoplasia, 11, pp.269~ (2009)
  29. L. S. Castillo-Peinado, , Anal. Chim. Acta, 925, pp.1~ (2016)
  30. J. G. Bundy, , Metabolomics, 5, pp.3~ (2009)
  31. O. Fiehn, "Brief Funct Genomics", pp.155~171 (2002), Springer
  32. O. Beckonert, , Nat. Protoc, 2, pp.2692~ (2007)
  33. O. Beckonert, , Nat. Protoc, 5, pp.1019~ (2010)
  34. A. A. De Graaf, , Magn. Reson. Imagin, 6, pp.255~ (1988)
  35. T. Rudi, , Food Chem, 106, pp.1375~ (2008)
  36. D. Schlenk, , Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 41, pp.325~ (2001)
  37. J. Gan, , Environ. Sci. Technol, 46, pp.1489~ (2012)
  38. H. Wu, , Anal. Biochem, 372, pp.204~ (2008)
  39. Y. Wang, , Anal. Biochem, 323, pp.26~ (2003)
  40. T. P. Dunkley, , Mol. Cell Proteomics, 3, pp.1128~ (2004)
  41. N. K. Khoo, , Lasers Med. Sci, 28, pp.1527~ (2013)
  42. N. A. Karp, , Proteomics, 5, pp.81~ (2005)
  43. X. Chen, , Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med (2015)
  44. C. Wang, , Environ. Pollut, 211, pp.252~ (2016)
  45. M. R. Viant, , Environ. Sci. Technol, 37, pp.4982~ (2003)
  46. L. Zhang, , Mar. Environ. Res, 72, pp.33~ (2011)
  47. H. D. Xu, , Aquat. Toxicol, 159, pp.69~ (2015)
  48. K. E. Hillyer, , J. Exp. Biol, 219, pp.516~ (2016)
  49. M. Ott, , Apoptosis, 12, pp.913~ (2007)
  50. T. A. Slotkin, , Neurotoxicol. Teratol, 32, pp.124~ (2010)
  51. X. Wang, , Crit. Rev. Toxicol, 46, pp.876~ (2016)
  52. H. Chu, , World J. Tradit. Chin. Med, 1, pp.9~ (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

NMR-based metabolic responses of the zebrafish exposed to Benzo[a]pyrene김석만, 김성혜, 이수진한국자기공명학회 · Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society2022 · 제26권 제4호Toxicological Implications of Fluoxetine Exposure on Zebrafish: Developmental Stage-Specific Metabolic Perturbations Revealed by High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning NMR김석만, 박상진, 이유진한국자기공명학회 · Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society2025 · 제29권 제2호The difference of metabolic profile between male and female zebrafish김석만, 윤다혜, 최진실, 최현수한국자기공명학회 · Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society2016 · 제20권 제1호잉어의 생체 내 대사체 변화에 미치는 플록세틴 영향규명 연구김상민, 김석민, 김일규, 도영선, 박유미, 석광설, 정인영, 조현덕, 한상범한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2017 · 제20권 제1호Assessments in biocides with omics approaches to ecosystem김석만, Dahye Yoon, Huichan Lee, Hyangjin Lee, Hyunsu Kim, Jieun Kim, Seohee Ma, Seonghye Kim, Soojin Lee, Yujin Lee, Yunsuk Lee한국자기공명학회 · Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society2018 · 제22권 제4호Metabolomic Analysis of Daphnia magna Exposed to Fluoxetine Using HR-MAS NMR김석만, 김성혜, 김혜민, 문소전, 박기수, 박지환, 이수진한국자기공명학회 · Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society2024 · 제28권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)