본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Inquiry of Constructs for an e-Learning Environment Design by Incorporating Aspects of Learners' Participations in Web 2.0 Technologies

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The major concern of e-learning environment design is to create and improve artifacts that support human learning. To facilitate effective and efficient learning, e-learning environment designers focused on the contemporary information technologies. Web 2.0 services, which empower users and allow the inter-transforming interactions between users and information technologies, have been increasingly changing the way that people learn. By adapting these Web 2.0 technologies in learning environment, educational technology can facilitate learners' abilities to personalize learning environment. The main purpose of this study is to conceptualize comprehensively constructs for understanding the inter-transforming relationships between learner and learning environment and mutable learning environments' impact on the process through which learners learn and strive to shape their learning environment. As results, this study confirms conceptualization of four constructs by incorporating aspects of design that occur in e-learning environments with Web 2.0 technologies. First, learner-designer refers to active and intentional designer who is tailoring an e-learning environment in the changing context of use. Second, learner's secondary design refers to learner's design based on the primary designs by design experts. Third, transactional interaction refers to learner’s inter-changeable, inter-transformative, co-evolutionary interaction with technological environment. Fourth, trans-active learning environment refers to mutable learning environment enacted by users.

Abstract

The major concern of e-learning environment design is to create and improve artifacts that support human learning. To facilitate effective and efficient learning, e-learning environment designers focused on the contemporary information technologies. Web 2.0 services, which empower users and allow the inter-transforming interactions between users and information technologies, have been increasingly changing the way that people learn. By adapting these Web 2.0 technologies in learning environment, educational technology can facilitate learners' abilities to personalize learning environment. The main purpose of this study is to conceptualize comprehensively constructs for understanding the inter-transforming relationships between learner and learning environment and mutable learning environments' impact on the process through which learners learn and strive to shape their learning environment. As results, this study confirms conceptualization of four constructs by incorporating aspects of design that occur in e-learning environments with Web 2.0 technologies. First, learner-designer refers to active and intentional designer who is tailoring an e-learning environment in the changing context of use. Second, learner's secondary design refers to learner's design based on the primary designs by design experts. Third, transactional interaction refers to learner’s inter-changeable, inter-transformative, co-evolutionary interaction with technological environment. Fourth, trans-active learning environment refers to mutable learning environment enacted by users.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Baek, E. O., "User-Centered Design and Development, In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology 3rd Ed", pp.659~670 (2008), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  2. Barki, H., "Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk", Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), pp.203~223 (1993)
  3. Berente, N., "High Impact Design Requirements- Key Design Challenges for the Next Decade, In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective", pp.1~10 (2009)
  4. Blumenfeld, P., "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning", Educational Psychologist, 26(3), pp.369~398 (1991)
  5. Brown, J. S., "Toward Informed Participation: Six Scenarios in Search of Democracy in the Information Age", The Aspen Institute Quarterly, 6(4), pp.49~73 (1994)
  6. Bruns, A, "Wikis in teaching and assessment: The M", Cyclopedia project, 2005, 25~32
  7. Carr-Chellman, A, "User-design research, In Handbook of research on educational communication and technology (2nd ed.): A project of the association for educational communications and technology", pp.701~716 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  8. Cheng, B, "Current and Future Research Directions in Requirements Engineering, In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective", pp.11~43 (2009)
  9. Cormode, G, "Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0", First Monday, 13(6) (2008)
  10. DeGennaro,D, "Learning designs: An analysis of youth-initiated technology use", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), pp.1~20 (2008)
  11. Dick, W., "The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.)" (2005), Allyn and Bacon
  12. Dohn,N, "Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), pp.343~363 (2009)
  13. Ernst, N., "Requirements evolution and what (research) to do about it, In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective", pp.186~214 (2009), 186–214
  14. Eva,M, "Requirements acquisition for rapid applications development", Information and Management, 39, pp.101~107 (2001)
  15. Fischer,G, "Designing Socio-Technical Environments in Support of Meta- Design and Social Creativity", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL '2007), pp.1~10 (2007), Rutgers University
  16. Fischer,G, "End-User Development and Meta-Design Foundations for Cultures of Participation", End-User Development, 5435, pp.3~14 (2009)
  17. Germonprez, M, "Task, technology, and tailoring in communicative action: An in-depth analysis of group communication", Information and Organization, 19(1), pp.22~46 (2009)
  18. Germonprez, M., "A Theory Of Tailorable Technology Design", Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(6), pp.351~367 (2007)
  19. Greenhow, C., "Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now", Educational Researcher, 38(4), pp.246~259 (2009)
  20. Gregor, S, "The Anatomy of a Design Theory", Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(5), pp.312~335 (2007)
  21. Gustafson, K. L, "What is instructional design?, In Trends and issues in instructional design and technology", pp.16~25 (2002)
  22. Hansen, S., "Requirements in the 21st century: Current practice and emerging trends, In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective", pp.44~87 (2009)
  23. Heinich, R., "Instructional media and technologies for learning" (2001), Prentice Hall
  24. Hovorka, D, "Reflecting, tinkering, and tailoring: Implications for theories of information system design, In Reframing Humans in Information Systems Development", pp.135~150 (2011)
  25. Hovorka, D, "Active Collaboration Learning Environments", The Class of Web 2.0. 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems Active Collaboration Learning Environments (2009)
  26. Hyysalo, S, "Users, an emerging human resource for R&D? From eliciting to exploring users’ needs", International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 4(1), pp.22~37 (2004)
  27. Jiang, J, "Software development risks to project effectiveness", Journal of Systems and Software, 52, pp.3~10 (2000)
  28. Kafai, Y. B, "Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Hillsdale" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  29. Kafai, Y. B, "Constructionism, In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.35~46 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  30. Kirschner, P., "Designing electronic collaborative learning environments", Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), pp.47~66 (2004)
  31. Korfiatis, N. T., "Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: An insight from Wikipedia", Online Information Review, 30, pp.252~262 (2006)
  32. Krajcik, J. S, "Project-based learning, In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.317~333 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  33. Kuiper, E., "The Web as an information resource in K–12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information", Review of Educational Research, 75, pp.285~328 (2005)
  34. "Writing, technology, and teens" (2008)[URL]
  35. Livingstone, S., "Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies, In Handbook of research on new literacies", pp.103~132 (2008), Lawrence Erlbaum
  36. Moynihan, T, "Coping with requirement-uncertainty: the theories-of-action of experienced IS", software project managers, 2000, pp.53, 99~109
  37. Nidumolu, S, "The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: residual performance risk as an intervening variable", Information Systems Research, 6(3), pp.191~219 (1995)
  38. Notari,M, "How to use a Wiki in education: Wiki based effective constructive learning", Proceedings of WikiSym’06—2006 International Symposium on Wikis 2006, pp.131~132 (2006)
  39. Reigeluth, C. M, "Instructional design: What is it and why is it?, In Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (Vol. 1)", pp.3~36 (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  40. Reinhold,S, "Wikitrails: Augmenting Wiki structure for collaborative, interdisciplinary learning", Proceedings of WikiSym’06—2006 International Symposium on Wikis 2006, pp.47~57 (2006)
  41. Reymen, I, "The evolution of design requirements in the trajectory of artificiality: A research agenda, In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective", pp.91~102 (2009)
  42. Rick, J, "Situating CoWeb: A scholarship of application", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, pp.89~115 (2006)
  43. Scardamalia, M, "Computer support for knowledge-building communities", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), pp.265~283 (1994)
  44. Scardamalia, M, "Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology, In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.97~118 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  45. Schmidt, R., "Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study", Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), pp.5~36 (2001)
  46. Shin, W., "Wiki-based rapid prototyping for teachingmaterial design in e-Learning grids", Computer & Education, 51, pp.1037~1057 (2007)
  47. Simon,H.A, "The sciences of the artificial" (1996), The MIT Press
  48. Solomon, G, "Web 2.0: New tools, new schools" (2007), International Society for Technology in Education
  49. Spector,J.M, "A philosophy of instructional design for the 21st century", Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(4), pp.307~318 (2001)
  50. "Reflections on the future of instructional design and technology: AECT" (2004)[URL]
  51. Spires, H. A., "Having our say: Middle grade student perspectives on school, technologies, and academic engagement", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, pp.497~515 (2008)
  52. Stahl, G., "Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective, In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.409~426 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  53. van Harmelen, M, "Personal learning environments", ICALT ‘06: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp.815~816 (2006), IEEE Computer Society
  54. Vygotsky,L.S, "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  55. Wallace, L., "Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis", Information and Management, 42(1), pp.115~125 (2004)
  56. Wang, F, "Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments", Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), pp.5~23 (2005)
  57. Yukawa,J, "Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, pp.203~228 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)