Interaction Patterns in Distance Only Mode e-Learning
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to identify the interaction patterns in distance only mode e-Learning. In order to investigate this study, messages shown in the electronic notice board were analyzed to see how interaction occurs between teacher and learner or learner and learner under the e-learning of cyber university. To analyze messages was applied according to the framework by Henri's contents analysis model. As a result of contents analysis on electronic board, the participative dimension was 399 messages. A learner put on 7~8 messages a day. The number of messages was low compared to the number of learners, but the number of inquiries was about 140. That means that each learner contacts and checks messages at least once a day. The meaning dimension was 600 units. The main interaction patterns were Interactive-social-cognitivemetacognitive. This means that e-Learning in distance only mode leads a positive attitude of learners as a self-directed learning, and needs teacher's well-structured instructional strategies for increasing interaction. In conclusion, social dimension and interactive dimension of messages support learners psychologically in the process of learning though they directly guide learning under the circumstances of e-learning lacking face-to-face element. It can be interpreted that the teacher’s role is significantly important in order to attract learners’ positive participation and cognitive and meta-cognitive dimension of messages and activities.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the interaction patterns in distance only mode e-Learning. In order to investigate this study, messages shown in the electronic notice board were analyzed to see how interaction occurs between teacher and learner or learner and learner under the e-learning of cyber university. To analyze messages was applied according to the framework by Henri's contents analysis model. As a result of contents analysis on electronic board, the participative dimension was 399 messages. A learner put on 7~8 messages a day. The number of messages was low compared to the number of learners, but the number of inquiries was about 140. That means that each learner contacts and checks messages at least once a day. The meaning dimension was 600 units. The main interaction patterns were Interactive-social-cognitivemetacognitive. This means that e-Learning in distance only mode leads a positive attitude of learners as a self-directed learning, and needs teacher's well-structured instructional strategies for increasing interaction. In conclusion, social dimension and interactive dimension of messages support learners psychologically in the process of learning though they directly guide learning under the circumstances of e-learning lacking face-to-face element. It can be interpreted that the teacher’s role is significantly important in order to attract learners’ positive participation and cognitive and meta-cognitive dimension of messages and activities.
참고문헌 (15)
- Anderson, T., "Modes of Interaction in Distance Education: Recent Developments and Research Questions. In M. G. Moore, W. G. Anderson, (Eds). Handbook of distance education" (2003), New Jersey: Lawrence erlbaum associates, Inc
- Bretz,R., "Media for interactive communication" (1983), London: Sage
- Dabbagh, N., "Online learning" (2005), NJ: Pearson Education, Inc
- Henri,F., "Computer conferencing content analysis. In A. R Kaye, (Eds)", Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (1992), NATO ASI Series. Berlin: Spinger-verlag
- Hillman, D. C., "Leaner-interface interaction in education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners", American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), pp.30~42 (1994)
- Holmberg,B., "A Theory of Distance Education Base on Empathy. In M. G. Moore, Anderson, W. G.(Eds). Handbook of distance education" (2003), New Jersey: Lawrence erlbaum associates, Inc
- Horton,W., "E-learning by Design" (2006), CA: Jone Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Jun, Y., "Message assistant as a message analyzer", Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), pp.243~260 (1999)
- Jung, H., "The use of e-mail in teaching and learning", Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), pp.167~186 (1998)
- Jung, I., "Distance education" (2004), Seoul: kyoyookbook
- Kim, M., "An analysis of contents and usage of a Web bulletin board system", Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), pp.219~239 (1998)
- 이옥화, "온라인 수업의 실시간 토론 내용 분석", 교육공학연구, 19(1), pp.29~50 (2003), 한국교육공학회
- Moore, M. G., "Distance Education: A Systems View" (2006), CA: Wordsworth Publishing Company
- Moore. M. G., "Three types of interaction. In Moore, M. C., Clark, G. C. (Eds). Readings in Principles of Distance Education", The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, 100~105 (1989), The Pennsylvania State University Park, PA.
- Rha,I., "Web Based Instruction" (1999), Seoul: kyoyookbook