본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Proposing Evaluation Procedures for Blended Instruction

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this paper was to develop evaluation procedures for blended instruction, focusing on the courses that are currently offered in the university. This study analyzed current evaluation procedures and instruments and suggested redesign the evaluation process for blended instruction. The evaluation procedures are designed based on the combination of objective-oriented and consumer-oriented evaluation approaches. It includes three stages: front-end (screening), formative evaluation, and summative evaluation. During the front-end evaluation stage, information regarding students’ technology skills and attitudes towards online instruction and classroom instruction are suggested to collect and plan the instructional strategies accordingly. The formative evaluation is conducted during the semester to collect students’ opinions about the course and instructors modify their instruction based on the evaluation results. At the end of semester, summative evaluation is to be conducted to collect the data to improve the course. Evaluation questions and components for each stage are developed to collect the data such as students’ perceptions of the course, the usefulness of online instructional materials, the effectiveness of blended learning strategies, and students’ satisfaction with the course.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to develop evaluation procedures for blended instruction, focusing on the courses that are currently offered in the university. This study analyzed current evaluation procedures and instruments and suggested redesign the evaluation process for blended instruction. The evaluation procedures are designed based on the combination of objective-oriented and consumer-oriented evaluation approaches. It includes three stages: front-end (screening), formative evaluation, and summative evaluation. During the front-end evaluation stage, information regarding students’ technology skills and attitudes towards online instruction and classroom instruction are suggested to collect and plan the instructional strategies accordingly. The formative evaluation is conducted during the semester to collect students’ opinions about the course and instructors modify their instruction based on the evaluation results. At the end of semester, summative evaluation is to be conducted to collect the data to improve the course. Evaluation questions and components for each stage are developed to collect the data such as students’ perceptions of the course, the usefulness of online instructional materials, the effectiveness of blended learning strategies, and students’ satisfaction with the course.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Alkin, M. C., "Unbundling evaluation use", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, pp.1~12 (2003)
  2. Alkin,M.C, "Evaluation theory development: II, In Evaluation and education: At quarter century: Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part II" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  3. Alebaikan, R., "Online discussion in blended courses at Saudi Universities", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, pp.507~514 (2010)
  4. Anderson, K., "Does the method of instruction matter? An experimental examination of information literacy instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms", Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), pp.495~500 (2010)
  5. Bennett,C.F, "Analyzing Impacts of Extension Programs" (1979), U.S. Department of Agriculture
  6. Bennett, C. F., "Targeting outcomes of Program(TOP)", USDA, draft document, ~ (1995)
  7. Brew,L.S, "The role of student feedback in evaluating and revising a blended learning course", The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), pp.98~105 (2008)
  8. Dziuban, C., "A course is a course: factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments", Metropolitan Universities, 12(1), pp.41~49 (2001)
  9. Feldman,K.A, "Identifying exemplary teaching: Using data from course and teacher evaluations", New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, pp.41~50 (2006)
  10. Fitterman,D.M, "Empowerment evaluation", Evaluation Practice, 15, pp.1~15 (1994)
  11. Garrison, D. R., "Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education", The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), pp.95~105 (2004)
  12. Ginns, P, "Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning", Internet and Higher Education, 10, pp.53~64 (2007)
  13. Kirkpatrick, D. L, "The 4 levels of measuring effectiveness of training and development", Paper given to HRD conference (1996), Institute of Personnel and Development,
  14. Mohebbi, N., "Application of CIPP model for evaluating the medical records education course at master of science level at Iranian medical sciences universities", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp.3286~3290 (2011)
  15. "The Hybrid Strategy: Blending Face-to-Face with Virtual Instruction to Improve Large Lecture Courses" (2002)[URL]
  16. Ocak,M.A, "Why are members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty member", Computers and Education, 56, pp.689~699 (2011)
  17. 오은주, "강의평가 실태조사를 통한 강의평가 개선 방향 연구", 교육방법연구, 21(2), pp.1~20 (2009), 한국교육방법학회
  18. Oh, E., "How are universities involved in blended instruction", Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), pp.327~342 (2009)
  19. Perry,W.G, "Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme" (1970), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  20. Riffell, S., "Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of hybrid course format", Computers and Education, 44, pp.217~235 (2005)
  21. Scriven,M, "The methodology of evaluation, In Perspective of Curriculum Evaluation" (1967), Read Mc. Nally
  22. Scriven,M, "Beyond formative and summative evaluation, In Evaluation and education: At quarter century", pp.19064~ (1991)
  23. National Society for the Study of Education, "Ninetieth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education"
  24. "Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. (Occasional Paper No. 5)" (1975)[URL]
  25. Stufflebeam,D.L, "The CIPP model for program evaluation, In Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation" (1983), Kluwer.Nijhoff
  26. Stufflebeam,D.L, "The relevance of the CIPP model for educational accountability", Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5, pp.14~28 (1971)
  27. Stufflebeam, D. L., "Systematic Evaluation: A Self Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice" (1985), Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
  28. Tyler,R.W, "General statement on program evaluation, In Evaluation and education: At quarter century. Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  29. Vaughan,N.D, "A blended community of inquiry approach: linking student engagement and course redesign", Internet and Higher Education, 13, pp.60~65 (2010)
  30. Worthen, B.R., "Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. (2nd Ed.)" (1997), Longman
  31. Young, J. R, "Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction", The Chronicles of Higher Education, A33~ (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)