본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역사회 연대의 관점에서 본 농협의 조합원 자격 법제의 개선 -유럽 및 일본의 법제를 중심으로-

Reform of Legal System of Agricultural Coop. Membership from the Community Solidarity perspective -Focusing on European and Japanese Legal System-

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농업경제학

초록

There has been a legal dogma that membership should be equal to farmer in case of agricultural cooperative membership in Korea. But we need to develop an alternative solution to match changes in social and economic needs, entitling farmer to general membership, and ex-farmer to limited membership. Both memberships are genuine memberships. In order to prevent non-farmers from governing agricultural cooperatives, it is needed to introduce some restrictions on limited membership, for example, public interest, or voting right, invoking French case. In this way, agricultural coop. could be evolved from industry cooperative into community cooperative. This study also focuses on “the autonomy of articles of association”, another form of private autonomy in field of organization or groups. Under this rule, individual cooperative can regulate its own membership. Korean law does not yet accept this rule while either Japanese or German law has accepted this rule. This autonomy rule is necessary for cooperatives to develop into the direction of community solidarity.

Abstract

There has been a legal dogma that membership should be equal to farmer in case of agricultural cooperative membership in Korea. But we need to develop an alternative solution to match changes in social and economic needs, entitling farmer to general membership, and ex-farmer to limited membership. Both memberships are genuine memberships. In order to prevent non-farmers from governing agricultural cooperatives, it is needed to introduce some restrictions on limited membership, for example, public interest, or voting right, invoking French case. In this way, agricultural coop. could be evolved from industry cooperative into community cooperative. This study also focuses on “the autonomy of articles of association”, another form of private autonomy in field of organization or groups. Under this rule, individual cooperative can regulate its own membership. Korean law does not yet accept this rule while either Japanese or German law has accepted this rule. This autonomy rule is necessary for cooperatives to develop into the direction of community solidarity.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 송재일, "농지 상속에 관한 법적 연구-조합원 지위의 승계와 관련하여-", 한국협동조합연구, 29(3) (2011), 한국협동조합학회
  2. 신기엽, "협동조합 길라잡이" (2010), 농협경제연구소
  3. 신인식, "준조합원제도의 운영현황 및 개선방향 검토", 농협대학 농협경제연구소 2004년도 제1차 정기세미나 (2004)
  4. 이선신, "우리나라와 일본 농협의 준조합원제도 비교 고찰", 농협경제연구, 33 (2004)
  5. 이인우, "지역농업의 가치와 협동조합의 역할", 지역과 농업, 6 (2011)
  6. 이향철, "일본 농업협동조합법의 성립 및 제도형성에 관한 연구", 한국협동조합연구, 21(2), pp.1~34 (2003), 한국협동조합학회
  7. 황찬영, "경제․사회 여건변화에 따른 지역농협의 조합원제도 개선방안", 한국협동조합연구, 28(2) (2010), 한국협동조합학회
  8. 홍행남, "(2012개정판)농업협동조합법 해설" (2012), 농민신문사
  9. 明田作, "農業協同組合法" (2010), (株)経済法令研究会
  10. 小山良太, "組合員と 組織活動, In 協同組合としての農協" (2009), 筑波書房
  11. 斉藤由理子, "独仏協同組合の組合員制度(今月のテーマ 欧州の協同組合と連帯ファイナンス", 農林金融, 59(3) (2006)
  12. 斉藤由理子, "多様な組合員の意思決定への参加--独仏の協同組合の事例から", 農林金融, 60(5) (2007)
  13. 斉藤由理子, "組合員․地域住民の意識にみる農協の組合員制度の方向性(組合員․地域住民と農協)", 農林金融, 62(7) (2009)
  14. 高田理, "農協組合員制度改革の方向ー准組合員の現状と対応方向を中心として, In 大転換期の総合JA 多様性の時代における制度的課題と戦略" (2011), 家の光協会
  15. 高田理, "組合員制度․員外利用問題 急増する准組合員と准組合員制度改革(特集 どうする? JA の制度改革), (制度問題の諸論点を考える)", 農業と経済, 77(8) (2011)
  16. 多木誠一郎, "投資組合員について--制度設計とわが協同組合法への示唆", 神戸市外国語大学外国学研究, pp.75~ (2009)
  17. 多木誠一郎, "韓国農業協同組合法における準組合員・員外取引について--制度設計とわが法への示唆(特集 わが国農村協同組合制度をめぐる諸問題と海外における農協制度の動向 日本協同組合学会 第30回大会ミニシンポジウム)", 協同組合研究, 30(2) (2011)
  18. 農協の組合員制度とガバナンスにかかる研究会, "准組合員の現状と准組合員政策" (2011), 社團法人JC総研
  19. 日本の農業・地域社会における農協の役割と将来展望 ― 最近の農協批判に応えて―, "農林中金総合研究所", ㈱農林中金総合研究所 調査第一部, ~ (2006)
  20. 船曳哲朗, "일본 농협법 해설" (2002), 농협중앙회
  21. 小楠湊, "프랑스의 협동조합법제", NHERI 경영정보, 27 (2008), 농협경제연구소
  22. ドイツ協同組合と組合金融の法的 構造 ―協同組合銀行の組織と業務, "小楠湊", ~, pp.総研レポート 14調一No.8 (2003)
  23. The role of cooperative and social enterprises: A multifaceted approach for an economic pluralism, "Borzaga, C.", ~, pp.Euricse Working Papers N. 000 (2009), 09
  24. Kalogeras, N., "Understanding heterogeneous preferences of cooperative members", Agribusiness, 25(1) (2009)
  25. Österberg, P., "Members’ perception of their participation in the governance of cooperatives: the key to trust and commitment in agricultural cooperatives", Agribusiness, 25(2) (2009)
  26. Zeuli, K., "The evolution of the cooperative model. Cooperatives and Local Development: theory and applications for the 21 st Century", ~ (2004)
  27. "독일법령-JURIS"[URL]
  28. "프랑스 법령-Legifrance"[URL]
  29. "일본 법령 - 法令データ提供システム"[URL]
  30. "우리나라 법령 - 국가법령정보센터"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)