An Extension of Information Manipulation Theory to Explain Cultural Similarities and Differences in Deception between South Korea and the U.S.
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Using Information Manipulation Theory (IMT), the current study examines the cultural similarities and differences in deception between Koreans and Americans. In addition, this research investigates how moderating factors and the culture-specific variable (i..e., nunch’i) affect the deceptiveness rating. An experiment examined both main and interaction effects for culture, condition, and violation type; a 2 (country: Korea and the U.S.) × 2 (condition: covert violation and nunch’i) × 5 (violation type: baseline, quality, quantity, relevance, and manner violation messages) mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. A total of 455 subjects including 199 Americans and 256 Koreans participated in the experiment. Consistent with the IMT literature, the results indicated that both Korean and Americans evaluated quality violation messages as more deceptive than any other type of violation messages. Besides, this study found that while Koreans evaluated nunch’i messages as less deceptive than covert violation, Americans did not. Finally, it was found that Koreans viewed nunch’i messages (i.e., overt violation messages) for quantity and manner violation as significantly less deceptive than Americans.
Abstract
Using Information Manipulation Theory (IMT), the current study examines the cultural similarities and differences in deception between Koreans and Americans. In addition, this research investigates how moderating factors and the culture-specific variable (i..e., nunch’i) affect the deceptiveness rating. An experiment examined both main and interaction effects for culture, condition, and violation type; a 2 (country: Korea and the U.S.) × 2 (condition: covert violation and nunch’i) × 5 (violation type: baseline, quality, quantity, relevance, and manner violation messages) mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. A total of 455 subjects including 199 Americans and 256 Koreans participated in the experiment. Consistent with the IMT literature, the results indicated that both Korean and Americans evaluated quality violation messages as more deceptive than any other type of violation messages. Besides, this study found that while Koreans evaluated nunch’i messages as less deceptive than covert violation, Americans did not. Finally, it was found that Koreans viewed nunch’i messages (i.e., overt violation messages) for quantity and manner violation as significantly less deceptive than Americans.
참고문헌 (30)
- Aune, R. K., "A theory of attribution of responsibility for creating understanding", Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (1998)
- Aune, R. K., "Tests of a theory of communicative responsibility", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, pp.358~381 (2005)
- Bavelas, J. B., "Truths, lies, and equivocations : The effects of conflicting goals on disclosure", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, pp.135~161 (1990)
- Burgoon, J. K., "Interpersonal deception : XII. Information management dimensions underlying deceptive and truthful messages", Communications Monographs, 63(1), pp.50~69 (1996)
- Choi, S. H., "Korean communication", pp.127~151 (1991), Young
- DePaulo, B. M., "Truth and investment : Lies are told to those who care", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, pp.703~716 (1996)
- DePaulo, B. M., "Lying in everyday life", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.979~995 (1996)
- Ekman, P., "Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage" (1985), Norton
- Grice, H. P., "Logic and conversation (Chapter 1): Studies in the way of words" (1989), Harvard
- Hara, K., "The effect of self-construals on conversational indirectness", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, pp.1~18 (2004)
- Jacobs, S., "Truth and deception", Communication Monographs, 63, pp.70~82 (1996)
- Jacobs, S., "Information manipulation theory : A replication and assessment", Communication Monographs, 63, pp.70~82 (1996)
- Kim, M. S., "Cross-cultural comparisons of the perceived importance of conversational constraints", Human Communication Research, 21, pp.128~151 (1994)
- Kim, M. S., "A cross-cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting", Communication Monographs, 61, pp.210~235 (1994)
- Lapinski, M. K, "Deception and the self: A cultural examination of information manipulation theory", master, pp.1995
- Lebra, T. S., "Japanese patterns of behavior" (1976), University of Hawaii Press
- Levine, T. R., "Modeling the psychometric properties of information manipulation ratings", Communication Research Reports, 15, pp.218~225 (1998)
- Levine, T. R., "Norms, expectations and deception : A norm violation model of veracity judgments", Communication Monographs, 67, pp.123~137 (2000)
- Levine, T. R., "The relative impact of violation type and lie severity on judgments of message deceitfulness", Communication Research Reports, 20, pp.208~218 (2003)
- Martin, E. M., "A Korean, English dictionary" (1967), Yale University Press
- McCornack, S. A., "Information manipulation theory", Communication Monographs, 59, pp.1~16 (1992)
- McCornack, S. A., "Messages production" (1997), LEA
- McCornack, S. A., "When lies are uncovered : Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception", Communication Monographs, 57, pp.119~138 (1990)
- McCornack, S. A., "Deception detection and relationship development : The other side of trust", Communication Monographs, 57, pp.219~230 (1986)
- McCornack, S. A., "Speaking of information manipulation : A critical rejoinder", Communication Monographs, 63, pp.83~91 (1996)
- McCornack, S. A., "When the alteration of information is viewed as deception : An empirical test of information manipulation theory", Communication Monographs, 59, pp.17~29 (1992)
- Murai, J., "Perceived deceptiveness of verbal messages : An examination of information manipulation theory", The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 69, pp.401~407 (1998)
- Park, K. S., "Han-kuk-in-oi communication: Nunch'i, che-myoun and Ki-pun, (Communication of Koreans: Nunch'i, face, and mood)", The Paper Presented in 103rd Korean Psychology Conference (1997)
- Turner, R. E., "Information control in conversations : Honesty is not always the best policy", Kansas Journal of Speech, 11, pp.69~89 (1975)
- Yeung, L. N. T., "Information manipulation theory and perceptions of deception in Hong Kong", Communication Reports, 12, pp.1~11 (1999)