공동생성적 대화를 활용한 통합 과학교육 실천의 증진
Promoting Inclusive Science Education Practices using Cogenerative Dialogues
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Promoting self-determination has become an increasingly important goal for programs serving students with Special Education Needs (SEN). Research examining self-determination in relation to transition education has emerged as an important topic in the field of Special Education. While studies have shown self-determination training provides considerable benefits related to post-secondary outcomes, students continue to be excluded from participating in a decision-making capacity during planning sessions for Individualized Education Programs (IEP) or Individualized Transition Programs (ITP). In this paper, we draw from a body of research in the field of science education to argue for “cogenerative dialogue” as a beneficial instructional strategy special educators and content area teachers could use to expand self- determination practices of SEN students. We provide examples of how this structured discourse method has been implemented by teachers and researchers to engage students in participatory dialogue about how to improve science teaching and learning. We conclude by raising questions about the efficacy of utilizing this method in different cultural contexts and we offer directions for future research on using cogenerative dialogue to expand self-determination practices of SEN students in Korea.
Abstract
Promoting self-determination has become an increasingly important goal for programs serving students with Special Education Needs (SEN). Research examining self-determination in relation to transition education has emerged as an important topic in the field of Special Education. While studies have shown self-determination training provides considerable benefits related to post-secondary outcomes, students continue to be excluded from participating in a decision-making capacity during planning sessions for Individualized Education Programs (IEP) or Individualized Transition Programs (ITP). In this paper, we draw from a body of research in the field of science education to argue for “cogenerative dialogue” as a beneficial instructional strategy special educators and content area teachers could use to expand self- determination practices of SEN students. We provide examples of how this structured discourse method has been implemented by teachers and researchers to engage students in participatory dialogue about how to improve science teaching and learning. We conclude by raising questions about the efficacy of utilizing this method in different cultural contexts and we offer directions for future research on using cogenerative dialogue to expand self-determination practices of SEN students in Korea.
참고문헌 (92)
- Abernathy, T. V., "Teacher perceptions of students’ understanding of their own disability", Teacher Education and Special Education : The Journal for the Council of Exceptional Children, 32(2), pp.121~136 (2009)
- Agran, M., "Teacher perceptions of self-determination : Benefits, characteristics, and strategies", Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities, 34, pp.293~301 (1999)
- Agran, M., "Asking student input : Students’ opinions regarding their Individualized Education Program involvement", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), pp.69~76 (2008)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (AAAS)., "Benchmarks for science literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Bayne, G., "Cogenerative dialogues as an instructional theory in science education, In The handbook of educational theories", pp.237~247 (2013), Information Age Publishing Inc
- Carambo, C., "Evolution of an urban research program: The Philadelphia project, In World of Science Education: North America", pp.473~489 (2009), Sense Publishers
- Carter, E. W., "Promoting selfdetermination for transition-age youth : Views of high school General and Special Educators", Exceptional Children, 75(1), pp.55~70 (2008)
- Carter, E. W., "Self-Determination prospects of youth with high-incidence disabilities : Divergent perspectives and related factors", Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(2), pp.67~81 (2010)
- Chambers, C. R., "Selfdetermination: What do we know? Where do we go?", Exceptionality, 15(1), pp.13~15 (2007)
- Cho, H., "The effect of social and classroom ecologilcalfactors on promoting self-determination in elementary school", Preventing School Failure, 56(1), pp.19~28 (2012)
- Darling-Hammond, L., "Professional Development Schools: Schools for Developing a Profession" (1994), Teachers College Press
- Elmesky, R., "Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), pp.807~828 (2005)
- Emdin, C., "Exploring the contexts of urban science classrooms. Part 1 : Investigating corporate and communal practices", Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(2), pp.319~341 (2007)
- Field, S. S., "Selfdetermination for persons with disabilities : A position statement on the division on career development and transition", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, pp.113~128 (1998)
- Fish, W., "Perceptions of parents of students with autism towards the IEP meeting : A case study of one family support group chapter", Education, 127(1), pp.56~68 (2006)
- Fleischer, D. Z., "The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation" (2001), Temple University Press
- Gargiulo, R. M., "Special education in contemporary society: an introduction to exceptionality" (2012), SAGE Publications
- Geenen, S., "Understanding and promoting the transition of minority adolescents", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26(1), pp.27~46 (2003)
- Getzel, E. E., "Voice of experience: What college students with learning disabilities and attention deficit", hyperactivity disorders tell us are important self-determination skills for success, 2006, pp.14, 33~39
- Gilberts, G. H., "The effects of peer delivered self-monitoring strategies on the participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms", Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26(1), pp.25~36 (2001)
- Grigal, M., "Self-determination for students with disabilities : Views of parents and teachers", Exceptional Children, 70, pp.97~112 (2003)
- Grimes, N., "Exploring multiple outcomes: Using cogenerative dialogues and coteaching in a middle school science classroom, In The part I underlined here should should be in italics", pp.303~326 (2010), Springer
- Guba, E. G., "Fourth generation evaluation" (1989), SAGE Publications
- Hart, J., "Self-Determination: A model for training elementary students to self-advocate for IEP accommodations", Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(5), pp.40~48 (2013)
- Jones, M., "Teaching Self-Determination: Empowered Teachers, Empowered Students", Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), pp.12~17 (2007)
- Kim, H. -J., "A Critical Ethnographic Study to Improve Scientific Fluency of Students with Special Education Needs(SEN)", 박사, pp.2013
- Kim, J. K., "The effect of demographic factors on self-determination ability of student with developmental disability", Korean Journal of Special Education, 36, pp.127~146 (2001)
- Kohler, P. D., "Transition-focused education : Foundation for the future", The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), pp.174~183 (2003)
- Lachapelle, Y., "The relationship between quality of life and self-determination : An international study", Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, pp.740~744 (2005)
- Landmark, L. J., "Compliance and practices in transition planning : A review of individualized education program documents", Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), pp.113~125 (2013)
- LaVan, S. K., "Cogeneration fluency in urban science classrooms", 박사, pp.2004
- LaVan, S. K., "The Role of Cogenerative Dialogue in Learning to Teach and Transforming Learning Environments, In Improving Urban Science Education: New Roles for Teachers, Students, and Researchers", pp.167~185 (2005), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
- Lehner, E., "Cogenerative dialogues and coteaching as fields for transforming urban teaching and learning", 박사, pp.2007
- 이숙향, "국내외 문화적 맥락에서의 자기결정에 대한 이해 및 현장 적용을 위한 고찰: 장애학생의 자기결정에 대한 인식 및 영향요인에 관한 국내외 문헌 중심으로", 아시아교육연구, 10(1), pp.1~32 (2009), 교육연구소
- Suk Hyang Lee, "자기결정에 관한 한국문헌들에 대한 고찰: 장애학생의 자기결정 증진을 위한 미래 방향과 실제", 특수교육학연구, 38(4), pp.369~390 (2004), 한국특수교육학회
- Lee, S., "Goal setting and self-monitoring for students with disabilities", Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, pp.139~145 (2009)
- McGahee, M., "Student-led IEPs: A guide for student involvement" (2001), The Council for Exceptional Children
- Martin, J. E., "Self-directed IEP" (1997), Sopris West
- Martin, J. E., "A 3-year study of middle, junior, and high school IEP meetings", Exceptional Children, 70, pp.285~297 (2004)
- Martin, J. E., "Increasing student participation in IEP meetings : Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidence-based practice", Exceptional Children, 72, pp.299~316 (2006)
- Martin, A., "Students’ opinions regarding their Individualized Education Program Involvement", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), pp.69~76 (2008)
- Martin, J. E., "Student engagement and leadership of the transition planning process", Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36(1), pp.43~50 (2013)
- Martin, S., "The social and cultural dimensions of successful teaching and learning in an urban science classroom", 박사, pp.2005
- Martin, S., "Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistry classroom : Using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point in science education", Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), pp.693~720 (2006)
- Martin, S., "Learning to teach science, In The part I underlined here should should be in italics", pp.567~586 (2009), Sense Publishers
- Martin, S., "Eye rollers, risk-takers, and turn sharks : Target students in a professional science education program", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), pp.819~851 (2006)
- Martin, S., "More than a conversation : Using cogenerative dialogues in the professional development of high school chemistry teachers. Educational Assessment", Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), pp.119~1136 (2009)
- Martin, S., "Using video in science teacher education: An analysis of theutilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers, In The part I underlined here should should be in italics", pp.417~433 (2012), Springer
- McDougall, J., "The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities", Remedial and Special Education, 31(4), pp.252~260 (2010)
- Morningstar, M. E., "A preliminary investigation of how states are responding to the transition assessment requirement sunder IDEIA 2004", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(1), pp.48~55 (2008)
- "Inclusion of students with disabilities: Fast facts" (2013)[URL]
- National Research Council. (NRC), "The part I underlined here should should be in italics" (1996), National Academies Press
- Nirje, B., "The normalization principle and its human management implications, In Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded", pp.179~195 (1969), President’s Committee on Mental Retardation
- Oh, J., "A survey study of special education teachers’ perception on and implementation of a self-determination skill", 석사, pp.2002
- Olitsky, S., "Coherence, contradiction, and the development of school science identities", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), pp.1209~1228 (2010)
- Pierson, M. R., "Factors influencing the self-determination of transition-age youth with high-incidence disability", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), pp.115~125 (2008)
- as praxis, In Models for science teacher preparation: Bridging the gap between research and practice, "Becoming-in-the-classroom: Learning to teach in", pp.2001, Roth, W. -M.
- ". Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 37" (2000)[URL]
- Roth, W. -M., "Learning to teach science as praxis", Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), pp.741~762 (2001)
- Roth, W. -M., "The implications of coteaching", cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation : Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice, 2001, pp.15(1), 7~29
- Roth, W. -M., "At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching" (2002), Peter Lang
- Roth, W. -M., "Redesigning an “urban” teacher education program: An activity theory perspective", Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), pp.108~131 (2002)
- Roth, W. -M., "Teaching together, learning together" (2005), Peter Lang
- Roth, W. -M., "Coteaching : Learning environments research as aspect of classroom praxis", Learning Environments Research, 5(1), pp.1~28 (2002)
- Schalock, R., "Cross-cultural study of core quality of life indicators", American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, pp.298~311 (2005)
- Scruggs, T. E., "Science learning in special education : The case for constructed versus instructed learning", Exceptionality : A Special Education Journal, 15(2), pp.57~74 (2007)
- Scruggs, T. E., "Science and social studies for students with disabilities", Focus on Exceptional Children, 41(2), pp.1~24 (2008)
- Siry, C., "Emphasizing collaborative practices in learning to teach : coteaching and cogenerative dialogues in a field-based methods course", Teaching Education, 22, pp.91~101 (2011)
- Siry, C., "Creating participatory discourse for teaching and research in early childhood science", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, pp.149~160 (2010)
- Siry, C., "Coteaching in science education courses: Transforming science teacher preparation through shared responsibility, In Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice", pp.57~78 (2010), Springer
- Solberg, S. V., "Quality learning experiences, self-determination, and academic success : A path analytics study among youth with disabilities", Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35(2), pp.85~96 (2012)
- Steele, M. M., "Teaching science to students with learning problems in the elementary classroom", Preventing School Failure, 49(1), pp.19~21 (2004)
- Stith, I., "Students in action: Cogenerative dialogues from secondary to elementary schools" (2008), Sense Publishers
- Taylor, C., "Student voice: theorizing power and participation", Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(2), pp.61~175 (2009)
- Test, D. W., "Student involvement in individualized education program meetings", Exceptional Children, 70, pp.391~412 (2004)
- Test, D. W., "A content and methodological review of self-advocacy intervention studies", Exceptional Children, 72, pp.101~125 (2005)
- Thoma, C. A., "Self-determination in teacher education : A model to facilitate transition planning for students with disabilities", Remedial and Special Education, 23, pp.82~89 (2002)
- Thoma, C. A., "A qualitative study of preservice teachers’ understanding of self-determination for students with disabilities", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), pp.94~105 (2008)
- Tobin, K., "Evaluation of science teaching through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue, In Evaluation in science education in the 21st century", pp.187~217 (2002), Kluwer Academic press
- Tobin, K., "Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue", Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 10(2), pp.51~73 (2003)
- Trainor, A. A., "Self-Determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), pp.233~249 (2005)
- Trainor, A. A., "From marginalized to maximized opportunities for diverse youths with disabilities : A position paper on the Division on Career Development and Transition", Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 31, pp.56~64 (2008)
- Villanueva, M. G., "Science education for students with special needs", Studies in Science Education, 48(2), pp.187~215 (2012)
- Wandry, D. L., "Teacher candidates’ perceptions of barriers to effective transition programming", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(1), pp.14~25 (2008)
- Wehmeyer, M. L., "Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation", Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, pp.303~314 (1992)
- Wehmeyer, M. L., "Self-determination and positive adult outcomes : A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities", Exceptional Children, 63(2), pp.245~255 (1997)
- Wehmeyer, M. L., "Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities : Examining meanings and misinterpretations", Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, pp.5~16 (1998)
- Wehmeyer, M. L., "A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student directed learning", Journal of Special Education, 34, pp.58~68 (2000)
- Wehmeyer, M. L., "Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school : The impact of self-determination", Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), pp.131~144 (2003)
- Wehmeyer, M. L., "A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of whose future is it anyway? On self-determination", Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, pp.45~56 (2011)
- Whitney-Thomas, J., "Packing the parachute : Parents’ experiences as their children prepare to leave high school", Exceptional Children, 63, pp.75~87 (1996)
- Woods, L. L., "Student-directed transition planning : Increasing student knowledge and self-efficacy in the transition planning process", Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 33, pp.106~114 (2010)
