<서동요> 배경설화의 구성방식 연구
A Study on the Way of Composition in Seodongyo Folklore
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Cho Heung-wook. 2010. A Study on the Way of Composition in Seodongyo Folklore. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture. Vol. 7-1. 239-259. According to the account of Seodong in Samgugyusa, King Mu wrote "Seodongyo," married princess Seonwha of Silla and built Mireuksa Temple at the request of Seonwha. However, the difference can be understood upon more detailed analysis of Samgugyusa. As already mentioned, the records dealing with King Mu consist of the legend of Seodong and the legend of Mireuksas's construction, the former based on legend and the latter based on fact. that is, the legend naturally continues onto the factual story of the temple. In general, most legends about the construction of any particular temple serve to clothe the temple in divine grace to lead the people to Buddhism. Therefore, the part in the legend that deals with the selection of the temple site is usually described in association with a strange, divine incident. This is the case with the story of a Maitreya triad appearing in the middle of a pond before King Mu and his queen, thus leading to the construction of Mireuksa on that site. In conclusion, it can be said that the legend of Seodong is a folk tale handed down among the people while the legend of Mireuksa's construction by King Mu is based on historical fact. Though the two tales were separated to begin with, the love story was incorporated into the story of Mireuksa as a way to enrich the legend of its construction. (Kookmin University)
Abstract
Cho Heung-wook. 2010. A Study on the Way of Composition in Seodongyo Folklore. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture. Vol. 7-1. 239-259. According to the account of Seodong in Samgugyusa, King Mu wrote "Seodongyo," married princess Seonwha of Silla and built Mireuksa Temple at the request of Seonwha. However, the difference can be understood upon more detailed analysis of Samgugyusa. As already mentioned, the records dealing with King Mu consist of the legend of Seodong and the legend of Mireuksas's construction, the former based on legend and the latter based on fact. that is, the legend naturally continues onto the factual story of the temple. In general, most legends about the construction of any particular temple serve to clothe the temple in divine grace to lead the people to Buddhism. Therefore, the part in the legend that deals with the selection of the temple site is usually described in association with a strange, divine incident. This is the case with the story of a Maitreya triad appearing in the middle of a pond before King Mu and his queen, thus leading to the construction of Mireuksa on that site. In conclusion, it can be said that the legend of Seodong is a folk tale handed down among the people while the legend of Mireuksa's construction by King Mu is based on historical fact. Though the two tales were separated to begin with, the love story was incorporated into the story of Mireuksa as a way to enrich the legend of its construction. (Kookmin University)
참고문헌 (11)
- 조병순, "삼국사기" (1984), 성암고서박물관
- 최남선, "삼국유사" (1983), 서문문화사
- 강혜선, "구애의 민요로 본 <서동요>, 백영정병욱선생 10주기추모논문집 간 행위원회, 백영정병욱선생 10주기추모논문집 한국고전시가작품론", pp.35~44 (1992), 집문당
- 김완진, "향가해독법연구" (1980), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이기백, "삼국유사의 사학사적 의의", 진단학보, 36, pp.162~165 (1973), 진단학회
- 이용현, "미륵사탑 건립과 사택씨", 2009년 신라사학회·국민대 한국학연구소 공동학술대회, 익산 미륵사지 출토 유물에 대한 종합적 검토, pp.27~32 (2009)
- 장덕순, "｢삼국유사｣의 설화문학적 가치. in : 삼국유사와 문예적 가치해명", pp.34~51 (1982), 새문사
- 조흥욱, "<서동요> 작자 재론", 어문학논총, 24, pp.67~85 (2005), 국민대학교 어문학연구소
- 조희웅, "삼국유사 불교설화의 형성과정. in : 한국문학사의 쟁점", pp.199~206 (1986), 집문당
- 최래옥, "서동의 정체. in : 한국문학사의 쟁점", pp.148~167 (1986), 집문당
- 홍사준, "백제 사택지적비에 대하여", 역사학보, 6, pp.254~258 (1954), 역사학회