본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

종이소재 패션제품 구매결정에서의 지각된 위험: 줌치한지 종이소재 가방과 지갑 제품을 중심으로

Perceived risks in purchase decision of paper fashion products: Focusing on bags and wallets made with Jumchi-Hanji papers

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생활과학

초록

This study examined the risk components and risk types perceived in the context of purchasing decisions of paper fashion products. This study also identified the levels of perceived risk by consumers and the differences between age groups in risk perception. First, qualitative data were collected through a focus group interview with 7 Korean females in their 20s to 50s. The interviewees were presented with two types of paper materials (undyed and dyed Jumchi-Hanji) and products (bags and wallets) made with the papers. The interviewees mentioned 11 risk components which were classified into five types of risks: performance (easily torn/lack of durableness, lint/pilling/wear-out, lack of water-resistant, no washability, and deformation and discoloration over time), social-psychological (old and traditional image), aesthetic (lack of design diversity, unsatisfactory appearance due to repair), financial (expensive price, lack of usability in daily life) and time/convenience (difficulty in handling) risks. Based on the results of the interview, a measurement for evaluating the risk perception of paper fashion products was developed. Second, quantitative data were collected from 64 Korean women in their 20s to 50s using the measurement. Respondents who were presented with the paper materials and the products perceived the performance risk more strongly than the social-psychological risk and aesthetic risk. In addition, differences between age groups were found: younger respondents perceived performance risk and social-psychological risk more strongly than older respondents, but older respondents perceived financial risk more than younger respondents. Based on this study, strategies for the risk reduction of paper fashion products were proposed.

Abstract

This study examined the risk components and risk types perceived in the context of purchasing decisions of paper fashion products. This study also identified the levels of perceived risk by consumers and the differences between age groups in risk perception. First, qualitative data were collected through a focus group interview with 7 Korean females in their 20s to 50s. The interviewees were presented with two types of paper materials (undyed and dyed Jumchi-Hanji) and products (bags and wallets) made with the papers. The interviewees mentioned 11 risk components which were classified into five types of risks: performance (easily torn/lack of durableness, lint/pilling/wear-out, lack of water-resistant, no washability, and deformation and discoloration over time), social-psychological (old and traditional image), aesthetic (lack of design diversity, unsatisfactory appearance due to repair), financial (expensive price, lack of usability in daily life) and time/convenience (difficulty in handling) risks. Based on the results of the interview, a measurement for evaluating the risk perception of paper fashion products was developed. Second, quantitative data were collected from 64 Korean women in their 20s to 50s using the measurement. Respondents who were presented with the paper materials and the products perceived the performance risk more strongly than the social-psychological risk and aesthetic risk. In addition, differences between age groups were found: younger respondents perceived performance risk and social-psychological risk more strongly than older respondents, but older respondents perceived financial risk more than younger respondents. Based on this study, strategies for the risk reduction of paper fashion products were proposed.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Aqueveque, C., "Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: The influence of consumption situation", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(5), pp.237~247 (2006)[DOI]
  2. 배정숙, "감즙 염색에 의한 견직물의 역학적 특성", 한국의류산업학회지, 15(1), pp.156~162 (2013), 한국의류산업학회
  3. 배정숙, "감즙 염색에 의한 레이온직물의 염색성과 기능성", 한국의류산업학회지, 17(5), pp.828~837 (2015), 한국의류산업학회
  4. Bauer, R. A., "Consumer behavior as risk taking", Proceeding of the 43rd Conference of the American Marketing Association, pp.389~398 (1960), Dynamic MarKeting for a Changing World
  5. 차임선, "업사이클링 제품디자인에 나타나는 특성 - 소재와 기법 및 제품사례중심으로 -", 한국디자인포럼, (53), pp.341~352 (2016), 한국디자인트렌드학회[DOI]
  6. Churchill, G. A. Jr., "A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs", Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), pp.64~73 (1979)[DOI]
  7. Cox, D. F., "Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior", pp.34~81 (1967), Harvard University Press
  8. Cox, D. F., "Perceived risk and consumer decision-making: The case of telephone shopping", Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), pp.32~39 (1964)
  9. DelVecchio, D., "Brand-extension price premiums: The effects of perceived fit and extension product category risk", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), pp.184~196 (2005)[DOI]
  10. Dholakia, U. M., "A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception", European Journal of Marketing, 35(11, pp.12) (2001), 1340~1362
  11. Forsythe, S. M., "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping", Journal of Business Research, 56(11), pp.867~875 (2003)[DOI]
  12. 한영숙, "감즙과 감즙염색 면직물의 항균성", Human Ecology Research, 43(3), pp.119~129 (2005), 대한가정학회
  13. 홍희숙, "천연염색 의류제품에 대한 지각된 위험과 혜택-천연염색 제품지식에 따른 차이-", 한국의류학회지, 32(9), pp.1343~1355 (2008), 한국의류학회
  14. 홍희숙, "국내산 닥 줌치한지의 물리적 성질 -줌치치기 시간, 초지기법, 합지 수에 따른 강도 차이-", 한국의류학회지, 41(4), pp.633~645 (2017), 한국의류학회
  15. Horton, R. L., "The structure of decision risk: Some further progress", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(4), pp.694~706 (1976)[DOI]
  16. Jacoby, J., "The components of perceived risk", Proceedings of the Third Annual Convention of the Association for Consumer Research, pp.382~393 (1972)
  17. 전양배, "수의용 소재로 활용을 위한 줌치한지의 물성에 관한 연구", 한국의류학회지, 38(3), pp.397~403 (2014), 한국의류학회
  18. (2016)[URL]
  19. (2017)[URL]
  20. Kang, J., "What are consumers afraid of? Understanding perceived risk toward the consumption of environmentally sustainable apparel", Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 41(3), pp.267~283 (2013)[DOI]
  21. Kaplan, L. B., "Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation", Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), pp.287~291 (1974)[DOI]
  22. "Korea fashion market trend 2017: Korea fashion industry index research: 2016 research analysis & 2017 market forecasting" (2017)[URL]
  23. Lee, H. R., (1996), Kwangilmunhwasa
  24. 이정순, "영ㆍ유아용 천기저귀 개발을 위한 기초연구 - 친환경 소재를 중심으로 -", 패션 비즈니스, 15(2), pp.107~119 (2011), 한국패션비즈니스학회
  25. (2018)[URL]
  26. (2015)[URL]
  27. Luce, M. F., "Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), pp.384~405 (1997)[DOI]
  28. Mitchell, V.-W., "Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models", European Journal of Marketing, 33(1, pp.2) (1999), 163~195
  29. Miyazaki, A. D., "Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping", The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), pp.27~44 (2001)[DOI]
  30. "Paper"[URL]
  31. 박현희, "업사이클링 패션제품의 지각된 위험 차원과 신뢰, 구매의도 및 추천의도의 영향 관계", 한국의류산업학회지, 17(2), pp.216~226 (2015), 한국의류산업학회
  32. "Proceeding of Korean Society of Archives & Records Management, International Conference on Conservation and Digital Preservation of Archives and Records", 2002, 263~272
  33. 박소정, "위험지각과 소비가치가 중장년층 소비자의 친환경 의류제품 구매의도에 미치는 영향 - 위험감소행동의 매개효과를 중심으로 -", 한국패션디자인학회지, 15(1), pp.51~68 (2015), 한국패션디자인학회
  34. "Fiber Technology and Industry", 2005, 117~125
  35. Roselius, T., "Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods", Journal of Marketing, 35(1), pp.56~61 (1971)
  36. Seo, Y. B., "Effect of traditional Hanji manufacturing process on its physical properties", Journal of Korea TAPPI, 33(4), pp.28~34 (2001)
  37. "About: Company"[URL]
  38. "About us" (2018)[URL]
  39. Winakor, G., "Perceived fashion risk and self-esteem of males and females", Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 9(1), pp.45~56 (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)