한국교회와 구원론: "새 관점"에 대한 복음주의의 대응 = 로마서와 갈라디아서에 나타난 바울의“이신칭의”(the Justification by Faith) 교훈을 중심으로-
Korean Church and Soteriology : An Evangelical Response to the New Perspective- With Specail Reference Paul's Teachings of 'Justification by Faith' in Romans and Galatians-
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 논문은 바울의 이신칭의 교훈을 재해석하려는 새 관점 운동에 대한 복음주의적 대응이다. 최근에 새 관점 운동을 주도하고 있는 샌더스(E. P. Sanders), 던(James D. G. Dunn), 라이트(N. T. Wright)는 다음과 같이 주장하면서 바울의 이신칭의 교훈에 대한 전통적인 이해에 도전하고 있다. 첫째,그것(이신칭의)은 바울복음의 핵심에 속하기보다 이방선교의 산물이다; 둘째, 그것은 구원론적 교리라기보다도 사회론적－교회론적 교리이다; 셋째,그것은 전가의 교리와는 무관하다; 넷째, 그것은 현재적 심판과 관련되어 있을 뿐 신자의 전 삶에 의존하고 있는 미래적 심판과는 무관하다. 로마서와 갈라디아서에 나타나 있는 칭의교훈에 대한 철저한 해석학적 연구에 의존하여 이 논문은 이신칭의에 대한 전통적인 이해를 옹호한다. 첫째,그것(이신칭의)은 바울복음의 핵심부분에 속한다; 둘째, 그것은 교회론적인동시에 구원론적이다; 셋째, 그것은 전가의 교훈과 함께 간다; 넷째, 그것은현재적 심판은 물론 미래적 심판과도 관련성을 지니고 있다. 결론적으로 이논문은 비록 새 관점이 제2성전 시대의 율법과 언약의 의미에 대하여, 그리고 바울의 ‘의’ 교훈에 대한 수평적 차원에 대하여 약간의 새로운 통찰을 주고 있다고 하더라도, 바울의 이신칭의에 대한 전통적인 이해를 거부하는 새관점의 주장은 성경적 근거를 결(缺)하고 있다고 주장한다.
Abstract
This is an evangelical response to the reinterpretation of the New Perspective on Paul(NPP) about the Pauline teaching of the justification of faith. Recently E.P. Sanders, James D,G. Dunn, and N.T. Wright, the most outstanding advocates of the NPP, have challenged the traditional understanding of Paul’s teaching on ‘justification by faith’, by arguing firstly, it(‘justification by faith’) is a Gentile mission product rather than the core teaching of Paul’s gospel; secondly, it is an social-ecclesiological doctrine rather than an soteriological; thirdly, it makes away with the imputation; and fourthly, it is related with the present verdict rather than the future verdict which will be given in accordance with the whole life of the believer. Throughout an exegetical research on Paul’s teachings on ‘justification by faith’ in Romans and Galatians, this paper defends the traditional understanding of ‘justification by faith’, by arguing firstly, it is a core part of Paul’s gospel, secondly, it is soteriological as well as ecclesiological, thirdly, it goes on with the imputation, and fourthly it is related with both the present and the future verdict. Therefore, this paperconcludes that the reinterpretation of the NPP about the Pauline teaching of ‘justification by faith has no biblical foundation, although the NPP has provided some new insights on the role of the covenant and the law within Second Temple Judaism, as well as on the horizontal meaning of the righteousness in the Pauline letters.
참고문헌 (34)
- Avemarie,F, "Tora und Leben:Untersuchungen zur Heilsbedeutung der Tora in der frühen rabbinischen Literatur in TSAT" (1996), Mohr
- Bird,F, "The Saving Righteousness of God:Studies on Paul,Justification,and the New Perspective" (2007), Paternoster
- Calvin,John., "Institutes of the Christian Religion in Ford Lewis Battles" (1960), Westminster
- Carson, D. A., "Justification and Variegated Nomism. Vol. 1: The Complexities of Second Temple Judaism" (2001), Baker Academic
- Carson, D. A., "Justification and Variegated Nomism Vol. 2: The Paradoxes of Paul" (2004), Baker Academic
- Das,A.A, "Paul,the Law and the Covenant" (2001), Hendrickson
- De Roo,J.C.R, "‘Works of the Law’ at Qumran and in Paul in NTM" (2007), Phoenix
- Dunn,James D.G., "The New Perspective on Paul" (2008), Eerdmans
- Dunn,James D.G., "The Theology of Paul the Apostle" (1998), Eerdmans
- Eskola,T.Theodicy and Predestination in Pauline Soteriology.WUNT 2, "Theodicy and Predestination in Pauline Soteriology in WUNT", pp.100~ (1998), Mohr
- Fesko,J.V., "Justification Understanding the Classic Reformed Doctrine" (2008), P & R. Pub.
- Gathercole,Simon J, "Where is Boasting? Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul’s Response in Romans 1-5" (2002), Eerdmans
- Husbands,Mark, "Justification:What’s at Stake in the Current Debates" (2004), InterVarsity Press
- Kim,Seyoon, "Paul and the New Perspective:Second Thoughts on the Origin of Paul’s Gospel" (2002), Eerdmans
- Laato,T, "Paul and Judaism:An Anthropological Approach" (1995), Scholars Press
- Neusner, J, "Judaic Law from Jesus to the Mishnah: A Systematic Reply to Professor E. P. Sanders" (1993), Scholars
- Ortlund, Daniel C., "Justified by Faith, Judged according to Works: Another Look at a Pauline Paradox", JETS, 52(2), pp.323~39 (2009)
- Piper,John, "칭의 교리를 사수하라" (2007), 부흥과 개혁사
- Piper,John, "The Future of Justification. A Response to N. T. Wright" (2007), Crossway Books
- Sanders,E.P, "Paul and Palestinian Judaism. A Comparison of Pattern of Religion" (1977), Fortress Press
- Sanders,E.P, "Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People" (1983), Fortress
- Schreiner,T.R., "Paul. Apostle of God’s Glory in Christ. A Pauline Theology" (2001), InterVarsity
- Seifrid,M.A, "Christ,Our Righteousness:Paul’s Theology of Justification" (2000), Inter Varsity Press
- Stuhlmacher,P, "Revisiting Paul’s Doctrine of Justification:A Challenge to the New Perspective" (2001), InterVarsity
- Talbert, C. H, "Paul, Judaism, and the Revisionist", CBQ, 63, pp.1~22 (2001)
- Tobin,Thomas H, "Rhetoric in Its Context:The Argument of Romans" (2004), Hendrickson
- VanLandingham,Chris, "Judgment & Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul" (2006), Hendrickson
- Westerholm,S, "Perspectives Old and New on Paul" (2004), Eerdmans
- Wright,N.T, "What Saint Paul Really Said" (1997), Eerdmans
- Wright,N.T, "Justification. God’s Plan & Paul’s Vision" (2009), IVP Academic
- Wright,N.T, "4QMMT and Paul: Justification, ‘Works’ and Eschatology in History and Exegesis: New Testament Essays in Honor of Dr. E. Earle Ellis for His 80th Birthday", pp.104~132 (2006), T & T Clark
- 최갑종, "로마서 듣기 온 세상을 향한 기독교복음의 진수" (2009), 대서
- 최갑종, "‘새 관점의 바울 연구’ 다시 보기", 신약연구, 8(1), pp.93~124 (2009), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 최갑종, "ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ, 어떻게 해석할 것인가?: 로마서 3:21-31에 나타나는 ΠΙΣΤΙΣ와 ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥΣΝΕ을 중심으로", 성경과 신학, 52, pp.65~107 (2009), 한국복음주의신학회