Trust in Dancesport Competition Judges and Moral Philosophy of Kant
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Judging in Dancesport competitions has been controversial for a long time. The hosting association is holding competitions more than 50 times a year, applying the respective judgment rules. However, the results of each competition differ, since subjective judging is implied instead of following codified rules. Therefore, judgment disputes frequently occur in competitions. Training programs on fair judging are held every year, because fair judging is necessary for each competition. However, the distrust toward judge assignments based on personal connections is not disappearing. The Korean Dacesport Federation (KDF) is instructing judges to follow judging rules and codes of conduct based on the World Dancesport Federation (WDSF). Despite these measurements great distrust toward judges keeps remaining. Studies on Dancesport have been conducted from various angles. However, an ethical approach towards judging has never been considered. No one would disagree about the importance of judgment rules and codes of conduct. The lack of philosophical rationality (lack of morality) could be the reason for the status quo. There should be a change in the philosophical rationality and an infusion of a sense of ethics of the judges in order to solve the problem of distrust. A Critique of Practical Reason based on Kant’s moral philosophy will be applied as a standard. Following issues will be examined throughout this article: first, judgment rules and codes of conduct of the KDF; second, a Critique of Practical Reason by Kant; third, the autonomy (freedom) of judges.
Abstract
Judging in Dancesport competitions has been controversial for a long time. The hosting association is holding competitions more than 50 times a year, applying the respective judgment rules. However, the results of each competition differ, since subjective judging is implied instead of following codified rules. Therefore, judgment disputes frequently occur in competitions. Training programs on fair judging are held every year, because fair judging is necessary for each competition. However, the distrust toward judge assignments based on personal connections is not disappearing. The Korean Dacesport Federation (KDF) is instructing judges to follow judging rules and codes of conduct based on the World Dancesport Federation (WDSF). Despite these measurements great distrust toward judges keeps remaining. Studies on Dancesport have been conducted from various angles. However, an ethical approach towards judging has never been considered. No one would disagree about the importance of judgment rules and codes of conduct. The lack of philosophical rationality (lack of morality) could be the reason for the status quo. There should be a change in the philosophical rationality and an infusion of a sense of ethics of the judges in order to solve the problem of distrust. A Critique of Practical Reason based on Kant’s moral philosophy will be applied as a standard. Following issues will be examined throughout this article: first, judgment rules and codes of conduct of the KDF; second, a Critique of Practical Reason by Kant; third, the autonomy (freedom) of judges.
참고문헌 (27)
- Vermey, R., "Sensing and Doing in Latin American Dancing" (1994), Kastell Verlag GmbH
- Bae Jong Hyuk, "Ethics metaphysics First" (2005), Acanet
- Bae Jong Hyuk, "Criticism of practical reason" (2009), Acanet
- Cho Mi Ho, "A Qualitative Analysis on Expertise of Dance Sport Judge", pp.2007
- Choi Byung Il, "A Comparative Study on the Scoring Method of Dance Sports", Master’s, pp.2003
- Hampshire, "The Skating system, Is there a better way?", ~ (2002)
- Hiller, S & Hiller, L., "JUDGING", Dance News. newspaper, 16th, November, ~ (2000)
- IDSF, "Operating Policy: Adjudicators' Code of Conduct and Standards of Ethics", ~ (2007)
- Jang Heung Suk, "A survey of the athletes' awareness of dance sports referees", Mater’s, pp.2005
- 강병호, "칸트의 거짓말 논문 - 칸트의 실수로부터 배울 수 있는 것 -", 철학, (124), pp.27~48 (2015), 한국철학회
- Kim Dong Kyu, "A Study on the Quality of Judges and the Vote of Combat Sports", Youngnam University Institute of Humanities and Sciences, 10(2), pp.281~321 (1989)
- Kim Eung Joon, "Objectives of the judges for the dance sports competition", Kahperd, 45(3), pp.469~479 (2007)
- Kim Jong-Kook, "Human rights and lies", Philosophy, 67, pp.59~77 (2001)
- Kim Jong-sik, "Lying in Kant Ethics", Daedong Philosophy Society, 15, pp.113~132 (2001)
- 김리원, "반칙과 거짓말 : 칸트 철학으로 본 스포츠윤리의 당위성", 움직임의 철학 : 한국체육철학회지, 24(1), pp.17~32 (2016), 한국체육철학회
- Korea Dance Sport Federation, "Regulations for Judging Management", KFD Judgment Committee, ~ (2007)
- Korea Dance Sport Federation, "Regulations for Judging Management", KFD Judgment Committee, ~ (2018)
- 이충훈, "댄스스포츠 경기에서 심사위원의 심사기준에 대한 분석", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 17(5), pp.253~264 (2006), 한국스포츠리서치
- 이충진, "거짓말 - 칸트 법철학에서의 위상", 칸트연구, (33), pp.41~62 (2014), 한국칸트학회
- Lee Joo Young, "A Study on the Direction of Sports Ethics Based on Kant's Moral Philosophy", pp.2016
- Ok Su Du, "2006year`s Dance Sports Judgment Class", KFD, ~ (2006)
- Park Soo Jung, "A Study on the Problem and Improvement of the Dance Sports Competition", Master’s, pp.2004
- Radler, D., "How a dance competition is judged", ~ (1998)