본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

應侯 視工 청동기들의 연대 및 그 명문의 連讀 문제

The Dates of the Yinghou Shigong Bronzes and the Problems of the Interconnected Reading of their Inscriptions

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This is a thorough analysis for the four bronzes and their inscriptions cast by a ruler of Ying state (Yinghou 應侯), Shigong 視工. As for the dates of the vessels, the author proves that the late Western Zhou dating of King Li is more reasonable. Another important point the author notes in the article relates with the possibility for the interconnected reading of the four inscriptions proposed recently by He Jingcheng 何景成. He suggests the following order based on the contents and calendrical marks of the inscriptions: The king's Wine festivity (xiangli 饗醴) for the ruler of Ying before the command to attack the Southern Huaiyi in the Yinghou Shigong gui 應侯視工簋, The Ying ruler's successful campaign against the Southern Huaiyi in the Yinghou Shigong gui gai 應侯視工簋蓋and the Yinghou Shigong ding 應侯視工鼎, and finally the Ying ruler's audience to the royal court to receive the king's award in the Yinghou Shigong zhong 應侯視工鐘. However, the author finds that in the Western Zhou bronze inscriptions the king usually holds the Wine festivity to praise his subjects after their merits. The calendrical evidence He Jingcheng noted further contradicts with the fact that the king traveled an average of about ten kilometer per day. Finally, the audience at Zongzhou 宗周, the main capital, had a special symbolic meaning for regional rulers so that it is unreasonable for the Ying ruler to travel more than 500km to receive awards for the successful campaign. Therefore, it is very difficult to accept He Jingcheng's seemingly interesting interconnected reading of the four inscriptions. The inscriptions rather demonstrate the importance of the Ying state as a base for controlling the southern region in the late Western Zhou period. They further shows the active roles played by Shigong, the ruler of the state at that time.

Abstract

This is a thorough analysis for the four bronzes and their inscriptions cast by a ruler of Ying state (Yinghou 應侯), Shigong 視工. As for the dates of the vessels, the author proves that the late Western Zhou dating of King Li is more reasonable. Another important point the author notes in the article relates with the possibility for the interconnected reading of the four inscriptions proposed recently by He Jingcheng 何景成. He suggests the following order based on the contents and calendrical marks of the inscriptions: The king's Wine festivity (xiangli 饗醴) for the ruler of Ying before the command to attack the Southern Huaiyi in the Yinghou Shigong gui 應侯視工簋, The Ying ruler's successful campaign against the Southern Huaiyi in the Yinghou Shigong gui gai 應侯視工簋蓋and the Yinghou Shigong ding 應侯視工鼎, and finally the Ying ruler's audience to the royal court to receive the king's award in the Yinghou Shigong zhong 應侯視工鐘. However, the author finds that in the Western Zhou bronze inscriptions the king usually holds the Wine festivity to praise his subjects after their merits. The calendrical evidence He Jingcheng noted further contradicts with the fact that the king traveled an average of about ten kilometer per day. Finally, the audience at Zongzhou 宗周, the main capital, had a special symbolic meaning for regional rulers so that it is unreasonable for the Ying ruler to travel more than 500km to receive awards for the successful campaign. Therefore, it is very difficult to accept He Jingcheng's seemingly interesting interconnected reading of the four inscriptions. The inscriptions rather demonstrate the importance of the Ying state as a base for controlling the southern region in the late Western Zhou period. They further shows the active roles played by Shigong, the ruler of the state at that time.

참고문헌 (80)

  1. 陳槃, "春秋大事表列國作姓及存滅表譔異", pp.338~339 (1969), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
  2. 李喬, "應國歷史與地理問題考述", 中原文物, pp.40~46 (2010)
  3. 周永珍, "西周時期的應國,鄧國銅器及地理位置", 考古, pp.48~50 (1982)
  4. 靭松, "記陝西藍田縣新出土的應侯鐘", 文物, pp.68~69 (1975)
  5. 中村不折, "三代秦漢の遺品に識せる文字: 附隷八分之說", pp.15~ (1934), 岩波書店
  6. 靭松, "記陝西藍田縣新出土的應侯鐘一文補正", 文物, pp.27~28 (1977)
  7. 張光裕, "藍田新出土的應侯鐘與書道藏器的復合, In 雪齊學術論文集", pp.97~100 (1989), 藝文印書館
  8. 保利藝術博物館, "保利藏金(續): 保利藝術博物館精品選", pp.156~157 (2001), 嶺南美術出版社
  9. 沈載勳, "晉侯蘇編鐘銘文과 西周後期晉國의 發展", 中國史硏究, 10, pp.3~7 (2000)
  10. 王世民, "應侯見工鐘的組合與年代, 保利藏金", pp.256~
  11. 李學勤, "論應侯視工諸器的年代, In 文物中的古文明", pp.253~ (2008), 商務印書館
  12. 嚴志斌編著, "近出殷周金文集錄二編 4권" (2010), 中華書局
  13. 朱鳳瀚, "應侯見工簋, 保利藏金", pp.121~127, 保利藏金
  14. 李朝遠, "應侯見工鼎, In 靑銅器學步集", pp.292~ (2007), 文物出版社
  15. 李學勤, "論應侯視工諸器的年代", 255~
  16. 陳佩芬, "夏商周靑銅器硏究: 上海博物館藏品 西周篇下", pp.413~415 (2005), 上海古籍出版社
  17. "首陽吉金: 胡盈瑩范季融藏中國古代靑銅器", pp.112~114 (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  18. 何景成, "應侯視工靑銅器硏究, In 新出金文與西周歷史", pp.228~
  19. 徐少華, "周代南土歷史地理與文化", pp.212~ (1994), 武漢大學出版社
  20. Li Feng, "Landscape and Powerin Early China: The Crisis and Fall of the Western Zhou, 1045-771 B.C", pp.69~71 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  21. 楊伯峻, "春秋左傳注", pp.1524~
  22. 何景成, "應侯視工靑銅器硏究", pp.251~252
  23. "國語", pp.132~ (1988), 上海古籍出版社
  24. 陳初生, "金文常用字典", pp.634~ (1987), 陝西人民出版社
  25. Li Feng, "Bureaucracy and the State in Early China: Governing the Western Zhou", pp.263~ (2009), Cambridge University Press
  26. 王愼行, "呂服余盤銘考釋及其相關問題", 文物, pp.1~ (1986)
  27. 何景成, "應侯視工靑銅器硏究", pp.228~
  28. Li Feng, "The Study of Western Zhou History: A Response and a Methodological Explication", Early China, 33, pp.300~305 (2012)
  29. 靭松, "記陝西藍田縣新出土的應侯鐘", pp.69~
  30. 盧岩編著, "近出殷周金文集錄 4권" (2002), 中華書局
  31. 馬承原, "商周靑銅器銘文選 三", pp.163~
  32. 朱鳳瀚, "應侯見工鐘", pp.159~
  33. 王世民, "西周靑銅器分期斷代硏究", pp.173~ (1999), 文物出版社
  34. 曹瑋, "周原出土靑銅器 8", pp.1766~1776 (2005), 四川出版集團
  35. 朱鳳瀚, "應侯見工簋", pp.124~126
  36. 王世民, "應侯見工鐘的組合與年代", pp.257~
  37. 馬承原, "商周靑銅器銘文選 三", pp.288~
  38. 韓巍, "西周金文世族硏究", 박사, pp.2007
  39. 馬承原, "商周靑銅器銘文選", pp.288~
  40. 西周靑銅器分期斷代硏究, "王世民", 86~101
  41. 李朝遠, "應侯見工鼎", 292~293
  42. 李學勤, "論應侯視工諸器的年代", 253~
  43. 陳佩芬, "夏商周靑銅器硏究 西周篇下", pp.443~ (2004), 上海古籍出版社
  44. 李朝遠, "應侯見工鼎", 291~
  45. 西周靑銅器分期斷代硏究, "王世民", ~
  46. "首陽吉金", 112~
  47. 西周靑銅器分期斷代硏究, "王世民", 96~97
  48. 李朝遠, "應侯見工鼎", 292~
  49. 朱鳳瀚, "由伯父簋銘再論周厲王征淮夷", 古文字硏究, 27, pp.192~195 (2008)
  50. 李學勤, "談西周厲王時器伯父簋", 文物中的古文明, pp.299~302
  51. Edward L. Shaughnessy, "Western Zhou History", 330~331
  52. Li Feng, "Landscape and Powerin Early China", 103~105
  53. 李學勤, "首陽吉金 應侯簋考釋, In 通向文明之路", pp.189~
  54. 李學勤, "探尋久被遺忘的周代應國", 文史知識, pp.12~13 (2010)
  55. 리펑, "서주시대 讀寫능력과 서사의 사회적 맥락, In 화이부동의 동아시아학: 민족사와 고대 중국 연구 자료 성찰", pp.174~176 (2012), 푸른역사
  56. 何景成, "應侯視工靑銅器硏究", 241~243
  57. 楊伯峻, "春秋左傳注", 206~208
  58. 楊伯峻, "春秋左傳注", 433~
  59. 國語, "上海古籍出版社", 374~
  60. 楊伯峻, "春秋左傳注", 463~465
  61. 金美京, "西周金文軍禮初步硏究", 박사, pp.2009
  62. 李學勤, "談西周厲王時器伯父簋", 300~
  63. 朱鳳瀚, "由伯父簋銘再論周厲王征淮夷", 104~105
  64. 李學勤, "談西周厲王時器伯父簋", 300~
  65. 詩經正義, "詩經正義, In 十三經注疏", pp.424~ (1980), 中華書局
  66. 屈萬里, "詩經釋義", pp.222~ (1980), 中國文化大學出版部
  67. 島邦男, "殷墟卜辭硏究", pp.360~ (1958), 中國學硏究會
  68. 馬承原, "晉侯蘇編鐘", 上海博物館集刊, 7, pp.14~ (1996)
  69. Li Feng, "Bureacy and the State in Early China", 260~264
  70. 沈載勳, "晉侯蘇編鐘銘文과 西周後期晉國의 發展", 10~11
  71. 李學勤, "探尋久被遺忘的周代應國", 8~14
  72. 任偉, "西周封國考疑", pp.257~288 (2004), 社會科學文獻出版社
  73. 심재훈, "西周청동예기를 통해 본 중심과 주변, 그 정치 문화적 함의", 59~69
  74. Li Feng, "Bureacy and the State in Early China", 268~270
  75. 김정열, "邦君과 諸侯 ― 금문 자료를 통해 본 서주 국가의 지배체제 ―", 동양사학연구, (106), pp.1~49 (2009), 동양사학회
  76. 李學勤, "探尋久被遺忘的周代應國", 13~
  77. 沈載勳, "金文에 나타난 西周군사력 구성과 왕권", 中國史硏究, 41, pp.50~53 (2006)
  78. 朱鳳瀚, "柞伯鼎與周公南征", 文物, pp.67~73 (2006)
  79. 周寶宏, "西周金文考釋六則", 古文字硏究, 27, pp.225~226 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)