7世紀初 唐의 對外戰爭 名分과 國際秩序
Tang’s Justification of Warfare and International Order in Early 7th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines characteristics of justification for warfare shown in the text of edicts (zhao) and commands (chi) in Tang China. During the seventh century the Tang, expanding outward, devoted large amounts of resources to establish a new international order. Emperor Yang undertook a series of military expedition against Koguryŏ to restore former Commanderies (jun) of Han, which finally triggered the overthrow of the Sui. But, under the reign Emperor Taizong of Tang, China had been at the center of eastern Eurasian world. When the Tang dynasty was established in 618, the memory of the Sui’s disastrous failures still rankled. Creating an eastern Eurasian world of multiple states, the Tang treated surrounding states as respected neighbors, they were vassal states of the past. Whereas the title of Heavenly Qaghan to mark his suzerainty over the nomadic and oasis peoples was largely significant. Taizong used the title to emphasize his vision of the empire as encompassing both the Chinese and barbarians. He proclaimed that the barbarians shared the ruler’s beneficent protection as the Chinese. Thus It would be possible for Taizong to justify intervention. Taizong also took the moral high ground to justify for warfare, claiming diaominfazui (military journey undertaken to sympathize with the people and punish the wicked). As Heavenly Qaghan, he showed empathy with hardships and privations of the common people in neighboring countries, thereby the target of strategy could be extended to neighboring states. The conquest of Gaochang was very significant step towards adding elements of history with justification of warfare. Notwithstanding dissent of government officials, Taizong claimed that the inhabitants of Gaochang had originally been “people of the Chinese dynasty” (zhongguoren) who had settled there in the Han, thus making it legitimately a part of the Chinese homeland that required direct rule. The idea conflated ethnic territory with dynastic territory evolved into territorial rights over lands had formerly been subject to previous Chinese dynasties. Taizong justified invasion and annexation to Koguryŏ by arguing that the territory used to be the four commanderies of Han.
Abstract
This article examines characteristics of justification for warfare shown in the text of edicts (zhao) and commands (chi) in Tang China. During the seventh century the Tang, expanding outward, devoted large amounts of resources to establish a new international order. Emperor Yang undertook a series of military expedition against Koguryŏ to restore former Commanderies (jun) of Han, which finally triggered the overthrow of the Sui. But, under the reign Emperor Taizong of Tang, China had been at the center of eastern Eurasian world. When the Tang dynasty was established in 618, the memory of the Sui’s disastrous failures still rankled. Creating an eastern Eurasian world of multiple states, the Tang treated surrounding states as respected neighbors, they were vassal states of the past. Whereas the title of Heavenly Qaghan to mark his suzerainty over the nomadic and oasis peoples was largely significant. Taizong used the title to emphasize his vision of the empire as encompassing both the Chinese and barbarians. He proclaimed that the barbarians shared the ruler’s beneficent protection as the Chinese. Thus It would be possible for Taizong to justify intervention. Taizong also took the moral high ground to justify for warfare, claiming diaominfazui (military journey undertaken to sympathize with the people and punish the wicked). As Heavenly Qaghan, he showed empathy with hardships and privations of the common people in neighboring countries, thereby the target of strategy could be extended to neighboring states. The conquest of Gaochang was very significant step towards adding elements of history with justification of warfare. Notwithstanding dissent of government officials, Taizong claimed that the inhabitants of Gaochang had originally been “people of the Chinese dynasty” (zhongguoren) who had settled there in the Han, thus making it legitimately a part of the Chinese homeland that required direct rule. The idea conflated ethnic territory with dynastic territory evolved into territorial rights over lands had formerly been subject to previous Chinese dynasties. Taizong justified invasion and annexation to Koguryŏ by arguing that the territory used to be the four commanderies of Han.
참고문헌 (40)
- "『宋書』, 『魏書』, 『隋書』, 『舊唐書』, 『新唐書』", 中華書局 標點校勘本, ~
- 許敬宗, "日藏弘仁本文館詞林校證" (2001), 中華書局
- 李林甫, "唐六典" (1992), 中華書局
- 杜佑, "(校點本)通典(全5冊)" (2007), 中華書局
- 李吉甫, "元和郡縣圖志" (1983), 中華書局
- 王欽若, "冊府元龜" (2006), 鳳凰出版社
- 宋敏求, "唐大詔令集" (2008), 中華書局
- 司馬光, "資治通鑑(全20冊)" (1976), 中華書局
- 宋燾, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 董浩, "全唐文(全11冊)" (1983), 中華書局
- 吳玉貴, "突厥汗國與隋唐關係史硏究" (1998), 社會科學出版社
- 王素, "高昌史稿(統治編)" (1998), 文物出版社
- 李大龍, "漢唐藩屬體制硏究" (2006), 中國社會科學出版社
- 周偉洲, "吐谷渾史" (2006), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 中央民族大學歷史文化學院, "歐亞視域下長城南北的文明互動”學術硏討 會論文集" (2015), 中央民族大學
- 菅沼愛語, "7世紀後半から8世紀の東部ユーラシアの國際情勢とその推移― 唐ㆍ吐蕃ㆍ突厥の外交關係を中心に" (2013), 溪水社
- 堀敏一, "중국과 고대 동아시아 세계" (2012), 동국대학교출판부
- 鈴木靖民, "梁職貢圖と東部ユーラシア世界" (2014), 勉誠出版
- Graff, David Andrew, "Medieval Chinese warfare, 300-900" (2002), Routledge
- Skaff, Jonathan Karam, "Sui-Tang China and its Turko-Mongol Neighbors : Culture, Power, and Connections, 580-800" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Vaissière, Étienne de la, "Sogdian Traders: a History" (2005), Brill
- Wang, Zhen-ping, "Tang China in Multi-polar Asia : A History of Diplomacy and War" (2013), University of Hawaii Press
- 朴漢濟, "魏晉-隋唐時代 胡族君主의 中華帝王으로의 變身過程과 그 論理―‘多民族國家’ 形成의 一 契機에 대한 探索―", 중앙아시아연구, 9, pp.1~28 (2004), 중앙아시아학회
- 朴漢濟, "한국 고대국가와 중국왕조의 조공ㆍ책봉관계" (2006), 고구려연구 재단
- 이기천, "7세기 唐의 諸衛將軍號 수여와 蕃將의 대응", 동양사학연구, (120), pp.61~104 (2012), 동양사학회
- 李成珪, "歷史上의 分裂과 再統一(上)" (1992), 一潮閣
- 李成珪, "中國의 分裂體制模式과 東아시아 諸國" (1996), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 이성규, "中華帝國의 팽창과 축소: 그 이념과 실제", 역사학보, (186), pp.87~133 (2005), 역사학회
- 林起煥, "전쟁과 동북아의 국제질서" (2006), 一潮閣
- 鄭炳俊, "동북공정과 한국학계의 대응논리" (2008), 여유당
- 榮新江, "中古中國與粟特文明" (2014), 三聯書店
- 榮新江, "中古中國與外來文明(修訂版)" (2014), 三聯書店
- 榮新江, "絲綢之路與東西文化交流" (2015), 北京大學出版社
- 金子修一, "隋唐の國際秩序と東アジア" (2001), 名著刊行會
- 金子修一, "隋唐の國際秩序と東アジア" (2001), 名著刊行會
- 辻正博, "中國東アジ ア外交交流史の硏究" (2007), 京都大學出版會
- 西嶋定生, "中國古代國家と東アジア世界" (1983), 東京大學出版社
- 西嶋定生, "西嶋定生東 アジア史論集 3" (2002), 岩波書店
- Graff, David Andrew, "Warfare in Inner Asian History: 500-1800" (2002), Brill
- Yang, Shao-yun, "‘What Do Barbarians Know of Gratitude?’ : The Stereotype of Barbarian Perfidy and Its Uses in Tang Foreign Policy Rhetoric", Tang Studies, 31 (2013)
