본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동아시아 複都制와 多京制의 구분

Distinction Between Dual Royal Cities System and Multiple Capital System in East Asia

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper aims at proposing a distinction between dual royal cities system(複都制) and multiple capital system(多京制) that operated in East Asia. The core of this distinction key was to distinguish the meanings of royal city(都) and capital(京). Since Han dynasty, royal city(都) only referred to the cities where the royal shrine(宗廟) was built by emperor‘s power monopolizing the right to perform ancestral rites, and capital(京) referred to the top-level city within the administrative system under the bureaucracy. In general, royal city(都) was capital(京), but not all capital(京) were royal city(都). Specifically, Xin(新), Sui(隋), and Wuzhou(武周) operated dual royal cities by establishing royal shrine in Changan(長安) and Luoyang(洛陽) at the same time, while the Tang dynasty operated multiple capital system by organizing Changan, Luoyang and Taiyuan(太原) into the same top-level administrative unit, capital(京). On the other hand, in case of Ye(鄴) and Jinyang(Taiyuan) of Dongwei-Beiqi(東魏-北齊), and Heijokyo(平城京) and Naniwakyo(難波京) of 8th century Japan which were often interpreted as dual royal cities system(複都制), it can be understood as multiple capital, not dual royal cities, since Jinyang(Taiyuan) and Naniwakyo are of low status than Ye and Heijokyo. Dual royal cities system and multiple capital system also differed in their operating background. After the dynastic revolution, the operating backgrounds of dual royal cities system of Xin, Sui and Wuzhou focused on Luoyang as the same status of Changan in order to enhance the legitimacy of the dynasty. On the other hand, the operating backgrounds of multiple capital were different in each society. While Tang operated multiple capital system to secure a base for nationwide control, Dongwei-Beiqi operated multiple capital system in order to maximize the military function of Jinyang(Taiyuan) in the military confrontation with Xiwei-Beizhou(西魏-北周). 8th Century Japan's multiple capital system was a transitional royal city system established in the process of transition to the bureaucracy based on legal system(律令) after the acceptance of Tang's legal system.

Abstract

This paper aims at proposing a distinction between dual royal cities system(複都制) and multiple capital system(多京制) that operated in East Asia. The core of this distinction key was to distinguish the meanings of royal city(都) and capital(京). Since Han dynasty, royal city(都) only referred to the cities where the royal shrine(宗廟) was built by emperor‘s power monopolizing the right to perform ancestral rites, and capital(京) referred to the top-level city within the administrative system under the bureaucracy. In general, royal city(都) was capital(京), but not all capital(京) were royal city(都). Specifically, Xin(新), Sui(隋), and Wuzhou(武周) operated dual royal cities by establishing royal shrine in Changan(長安) and Luoyang(洛陽) at the same time, while the Tang dynasty operated multiple capital system by organizing Changan, Luoyang and Taiyuan(太原) into the same top-level administrative unit, capital(京). On the other hand, in case of Ye(鄴) and Jinyang(Taiyuan) of Dongwei-Beiqi(東魏-北齊), and Heijokyo(平城京) and Naniwakyo(難波京) of 8th century Japan which were often interpreted as dual royal cities system(複都制), it can be understood as multiple capital, not dual royal cities, since Jinyang(Taiyuan) and Naniwakyo are of low status than Ye and Heijokyo. Dual royal cities system and multiple capital system also differed in their operating background. After the dynastic revolution, the operating backgrounds of dual royal cities system of Xin, Sui and Wuzhou focused on Luoyang as the same status of Changan in order to enhance the legitimacy of the dynasty. On the other hand, the operating backgrounds of multiple capital were different in each society. While Tang operated multiple capital system to secure a base for nationwide control, Dongwei-Beiqi operated multiple capital system in order to maximize the military function of Jinyang(Taiyuan) in the military confrontation with Xiwei-Beizhou(西魏-北周). 8th Century Japan's multiple capital system was a transitional royal city system established in the process of transition to the bureaucracy based on legal system(律令) after the acceptance of Tang's legal system.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. "舊唐書", ~
  2. "唐六典", ~
  3. "唐會要", ~
  4. "北齊書", ~
  5. "續日本記", ~
  6. "隋書", ~
  7. "新唐書", ~
  8. "令集解", ~
  9. "元和郡縣圖志", ~
  10. "爾雅注疏", ~
  11. "日本書紀", ~
  12. "資治通鑑", ~
  13. "周書", ~
  14. "彰德府志", ~
  15. "春秋左氏傳", ~
  16. "太平御覽", ~
  17. "漢書", ~
  18. 葛志毅, "王莽改制的經學文化基础", 求是學刊, 1993(2) (1993), 黑龍江大學
  19. 盖金偉, "論東都太廟與唐代政治", 新疆師範大學學報, 22(4) (2001), 新疆師範大學
  20. 古內繪里子, "古代都城の形態と支配構造" (2017), 同成社
  21. 古閑正浩, "都城-古代日本のシンボリズム" (2007), 靑木書店
  22. 谷川道雄, "中國都市の歷史的硏究" (1988), 刀手書房
  23. 郭善兵, "中國古代帝王宗廟禮制硏究" (2007), 人民出版社
  24. KOMIYAHIDETAKA, "日本 古代都城의 儀禮空間과 王權의 位相", 한국고대사연구, (71), pp.317~353 (2013), 한국고대사학회
  25. 권순홍, "도성 관련 용어 검토 — ‘都’ㆍ‘郭’ㆍ‘京’을 중심으로 —", 사림, (62), pp.35~63 (2017), 수선사학회[DOI]
  26. 金子修一, "中國古代皇帝祭祀の硏究" (2006), 岩波書店
  27. 김용찬, "前漢 末 國家祭祀의 中央集中 編制", 사림, (66), pp.283~330 (2018), 수선사학회[DOI]
  28. 김일권, "동양 천문사상, 하늘의 역사" (2007), 예문서원
  29. 김일권, "동양 천문사상, 인간의 역사" (2007), 예문서원
  30. 김종섭, "唐人의 首都, 京師", 중국고중세사연구, (34), pp.145~179 (2014), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  31. 東晋次, "王莽: 儒家の理想に憑かれた男" (2003), 白帝社
  32. 礪波護, "隋唐都城財政史論考" (2016), 法藏館
  33. 毛漢光, "中國中古政治史論" (2002), 上海書店出版社
  34. 朴漢濟, "分裂과 統合-中國 中世의 諸相-" (1998), 지식산업사
  35. 朴漢濟, "역사와 도시" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
  36. 박한제, "隋唐代 洛陽의 都城構造와 그 性格 - ‘中世的’ 都城構造의 終焉 -", 중국고중세사연구, (22), pp.359~423 (2009), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  37. 朴漢濟, "중국 중세도성과 호한체제" (2019), 서울대학교출판문화원
  38. 小笠原好彦, "日本の古代宮都と文物" (2015), 吉川弘文館
  39. 宋眞, "中國 古代 境界 出入과 그 性格 變化 : 通過祭儀에서 通行許可制度로", 박사, 동양사학과, pp.2012
  40. 신성곤, "宗廟 制度의 탄생-宗廟의 공간과 배치를 중심으로-", 동아시아문화연구, (57), pp.41~67 (2014), 동아시아문화연구소[DOI]
  41. 沈剛, "王莽營建東都問題探討", 中國歷史地理論叢, 2005(3) (2005), 陝西師範大學
  42. 岸俊男, "日本古代宮都の硏究" (1988), 岩波書店
  43. 嚴耀中, "北齊政治與尙書幷省", 上海師範大學學報, 1990(4) (1990), 上海師範大學
  44. 仁藤敦史, "都はなぜ移るのか" (2011), 吉川弘文館
  45. 丁海斌, "論中國古代的多京制", 社會科學戰線, 2015(8) (2015), 吉林省 社會科學院
  46. 趙永磊, "神主序列與皇位傳承: 北齊太祖二祧廟的構建", 學術月刊, 2018(1) (2018), 上海市社會科學界聯合會
  47. 조윤재, "中國 古代 陪都制의 形成과 類型 - 古代 韓國 都城의 復都制 검토를 위한 예찰 -", 중앙고고연구, (20), pp.106~159 (2016), 중앙문화유산연구원[DOI]
  48. 周一良, "魏晉南北朝史札紀" (1985), 中華書局
  49. 村元健一, "漢魏晋南北朝時代の都城と陵墓の硏究" (2016), 汲古書院
  50. 崔彦華, "“鄴-晉陽”兩都體制與東魏北齊政治", 社會科學戰線, 2010(7) (2010), 吉林省 社會科學院
  51. 崔宰榮, "唐 前期 三府의 정책과 그 성격―唐朝의 京畿强化策과 관련하여―", 동양사학연구, 77, pp.2~80 (2002), 동양사학회
  52. 최진열, "中國 北朝 地方統治 硏究" (2019), 아카넷
  53. 黃展岳, "關于王莽九廟的問題-漢長安城南郊一組建築遺址的定名", 考古, 1989(3) (1989), 中國社會科學院 考古硏究所
  54. 叶煒, "墨香閣藏北朝墓誌" (2016), 上海古籍出版社
  55. 賀業鉅, "중국 도성제도의 이론-『주례·고공기』의 도성제도" (1995), 이회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)