중국 군사외교의 이론과 실천
Theory and Practice of Chinese Military Diplomacy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Why has China exerted effort into military diplomacy since the late 1990’s? This may have originated from the strategic decision of Chinese leadership to promote national modernization through reform and opening-up policy. Prior to this, Chinese leadership had been stuck in a ‘revolution’ and ‘struggle’ since the establishment of the country. However, it subsequently transformed into a nation of ‘construction’ and ‘stability’ through reform, opening-up and the end of the Cold War. With a new agenda, the leadership required a stable and peaceful security environment for successful economic reform, opening-up and national modernization. As a result, it performed military diplomacy with ‘all-direction’, ‘all-area’ and ‘multi-dimension.’This research aims to identify the theoretical and practical characters of Chinese military diplomacy. It focuses on reviewing general theories in military diplomacy and finding features in theory and practices of Chinese military diplomacy. The paper also delineates a typology of behaviors on the background and progress of Chinese military diplomacy with ‘all-direction’, ‘all-area’ and ‘multi-dimension.’What type of Chinese military diplomacy is aimed at the two Koreas? It may be a complex type of ‘symbol,’ ‘pulling’ and ‘balancing’ rather than a single type. Specifically, China implements military diplomacy toward South Korea based on the ‘pulling’ strategy, and adopts a ‘balancing’ strategy towardNorth Korea. This difference is not caused by the ideology but rather by Strategy on the Korean peninsula concerning Sino-U.S relations, changes of the domestic political environment and national interests.
Abstract
Why has China exerted effort into military diplomacy since the late 1990’s? This may have originated from the strategic decision of Chinese leadership to promote national modernization through reform and opening-up policy. Prior to this, Chinese leadership had been stuck in a ‘revolution’ and ‘struggle’ since the establishment of the country. However, it subsequently transformed into a nation of ‘construction’ and ‘stability’ through reform, opening-up and the end of the Cold War. With a new agenda, the leadership required a stable and peaceful security environment for successful economic reform, opening-up and national modernization. As a result, it performed military diplomacy with ‘all-direction’, ‘all-area’ and ‘multi-dimension.’This research aims to identify the theoretical and practical characters of Chinese military diplomacy. It focuses on reviewing general theories in military diplomacy and finding features in theory and practices of Chinese military diplomacy. The paper also delineates a typology of behaviors on the background and progress of Chinese military diplomacy with ‘all-direction’, ‘all-area’ and ‘multi-dimension.’What type of Chinese military diplomacy is aimed at the two Koreas? It may be a complex type of ‘symbol,’ ‘pulling’ and ‘balancing’ rather than a single type. Specifically, China implements military diplomacy toward South Korea based on the ‘pulling’ strategy, and adopts a ‘balancing’ strategy towardNorth Korea. This difference is not caused by the ideology but rather by Strategy on the Korean peninsula concerning Sino-U.S relations, changes of the domestic political environment and national interests.
참고문헌 (47)
- 고수석, "북한·중국 동맹의 변천과 위기의 동학 : 동맹이론의 적용과 평가", 박사, 북한학, pp.2008
- 김순수, "중국의 對북한 군사협력" (2006), 육군사관학교 화랑대연구소
- 김용호, "현대 북한외교론" (1996), 오름
- 김태호, "중국외교연구의 새로운 영역" (2008), 나남
- 박병인, "상하이협력기구(SCO) 성립의 기원- ‘상하이 5국’에서 ‘상하이협력기구’로 -", 중국학연구, (33), pp.511~536 (2005), 중국학연구회
- 서진영, "21세기 중국 외교정책: ‘부강한 중국’과 한반도" (2006), 폴리테이아
- 한국 군사외교체제 정비방안: 비전과 과제를 중심으로, "안보경영연구원", 안보경영연구원, 57~61 (2006)
- 오진용, "김일성시대의 중소와 남북한" (2004), 나남출판
- 유동원, "중국의 유엔평화유지활동 정책: 배경, 특징과 제약요인", 중국연구, 43, pp.587~607 (2008), 중국연구소
- 이종석, "북한-중국관계 1945-2000" (2000), 중심
- 차이밍옌, "중국 군사력: 현대화의 발전과 도전" (2006), 21세기군사연구소
- 최명해, "중국․북한 동맹관계: 불편한 동거의 역사" (2009), 오름
- 황병무, "전쟁과 평화의 이해" (2001), 오름
- 황재호, "중․러 합동군사훈련의 전략적 의미", 주간국방논단, 5(1070) (2005)
- 康紹邦, "國際戰略新論" (2006), 解放軍出版社
- 高恒, "多極化世界需要樹立新安全觀", 世界經濟與政治, (11), pp.22~27 (2002)
- 郭新寧, "試論軍事外交的槪念, 定位及功能", 外交評論, 26(期), pp.48~57 (2009)
- 金正昆, "伙伴戰略: 中國外交的理性抉擇", 敎學與硏究, (7), pp.43~48 (2000)
- 軍事科學院軍事歷史硏究所, "中華人民共和國軍事史要" (2005), 軍事科學出版社
- 楊志恆, "中共近年對外軍事交流及其對我國國防安全之影響", 國家安全學術硏討會論文集, pp.2~14 (1996)
- 楊松河, "軍事外交槪論", pp.82~90 (1999), 軍事誼文出版社
- 王義㧪, "國家安全特性的變化與硏究困境", 國際觀察, (2), pp.19~20 (2000)
- 王普豊, "現代國防論" (1993), 重慶出版社
- 王逸舟, "全球化時代的國家安保" (1999), 上海人民出版社
- 熊武一, "軍事大辭典(上)" (2000), 長城出版社
- 熊光楷, "國際形勢與安全戰略", pp.123~139 (2006), 淸華大學出版社
- 陸民聲, "中共擴軍: 雇傭前蘇聯國防專家", 中國大陸硏究, 26(6), pp.55~57 (1993)
- 李效東, "國際軍事學槪論" (2004), 軍事科學出版社
- 錢其琛, "世界外交大辭典(上冊)" (2005), 世界知識出版社
- 錢春泰, "美國與强制外交理論", 美國硏究, (3), pp.49~64 (2006)
- 程瑞聲, "論中國對亞太安全的新方針", 國際問題硏究, (3), pp.2~7 (1999)
- 조준래, "중국의 대북한관계 특수성 연구", 박사, 국제관계연구학, pp.2002
- 朱梅生, "軍事思想槪論" (1997), 國防大學出版社
- 中共中央黨校國際戰略硏究所, "國際戰略新論" (2006), 解放軍出版社
- 中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室, "2004年中國的國防", pp.9~ (2004)
- 中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室, "2008年中國的國防", pp.57~55 (2008)
- 肖剛, "强制外交: 西方國家軍事外交的核心內涵", 國際論壇, 11(6), pp.1~7 (2009)
- "中共軍力基本報告" (2003)[URL]
- 韓麗, "無處不在的威脅: ‘新安全觀’槪念質疑", 世界經濟與政治, (10), pp.64~69 (2000)
- 韓獻棟, "中國軍事外交與新安全觀", 現代國際關係, (2), pp.50~57 (2008)
- 黃炳茂, "新中國軍事論" (1991), 법문사
- 中國安保論: 人民解放軍役割의 分析, "黃炳茂", 國際問題硏究所, ~ (1999)
- 解放軍出版社, "軍語" (1992), 解放軍出版社
- David Isenberg, "How Russia keeps China armed", Asia Times, ~ (2005)
- Samuel S. Kim, "China and the World: Chinese Foreign Relations in the Post Cold War Era", pp.51~ (1994), Westview Press
- Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2009, "U. S. Office of Defense", 28~ (2009)
- "鄧小平文選(第3卷)", pp.70~ (1993), 人民出版社