본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Populism out of Globalization: Drifting Civil Society in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

Today we are witnessing the decline of democracy and the resurgence of authoritarianism worldwide. Undoubtedly, democracy is in retreat, threatening to undermine political rights and civil liberties. I would like to point out two things of importance. First, while citizens throw doubt on electoral votes, they tend to rely on increasing activism on the streets and to show growing resentment online. This politics of distrust endangers representative democracy characterized by participation and contestation. Second, populism makes a comeback to threaten party politics while at the same time widening political and ideological cleavages. From Italy through Turkey to Brazil, populist parties have gained increasing power by resorting to either exclusionary nativism or inclusionary egalitarianism. This paper argues that neoliberal globalization has brought in sovereignty crisis in terms of making national policies on migration, refugees, inequality, polarization, job losses, and so on. I claim that the rise of populism manifests the weakness of today’s democratic representation system. However, populism is dictated by rhetoric and mobilization to remain in power. Propaganda and agitation often outweigh debates and participation. Populist movements or parties try to mobilize mass support to directly link to the people. I examine populist tendencies in South Korea that mobilize supporters through new social media characterized by fake news, misinformation, and biased broadcasting. South Korea’s civil society, that had expanded its space during candlelight protests in 2016 and 2017, has formed two antagonistic political camps, the pro-Moon group and anti-Moon group. It should be emphasized that civic empowerment would be the best possible solution to save democratic values and institutions in the face of populist challenges. In the midst of antagonistic conflicts between two opposing political camps, civil society has become too divided to play a part in empowering citizens. The future of Korean democracy would be dependent upon whether a strong and sound civil society can be revitalized for civic empowerment. I suggest that civil dialogues between two antagonistic political camps will play a key role.

Abstract

Today we are witnessing the decline of democracy and the resurgence of authoritarianism worldwide. Undoubtedly, democracy is in retreat, threatening to undermine political rights and civil liberties. I would like to point out two things of importance. First, while citizens throw doubt on electoral votes, they tend to rely on increasing activism on the streets and to show growing resentment online. This politics of distrust endangers representative democracy characterized by participation and contestation. Second, populism makes a comeback to threaten party politics while at the same time widening political and ideological cleavages. From Italy through Turkey to Brazil, populist parties have gained increasing power by resorting to either exclusionary nativism or inclusionary egalitarianism. This paper argues that neoliberal globalization has brought in sovereignty crisis in terms of making national policies on migration, refugees, inequality, polarization, job losses, and so on. I claim that the rise of populism manifests the weakness of today’s democratic representation system. However, populism is dictated by rhetoric and mobilization to remain in power. Propaganda and agitation often outweigh debates and participation. Populist movements or parties try to mobilize mass support to directly link to the people. I examine populist tendencies in South Korea that mobilize supporters through new social media characterized by fake news, misinformation, and biased broadcasting. South Korea’s civil society, that had expanded its space during candlelight protests in 2016 and 2017, has formed two antagonistic political camps, the pro-Moon group and anti-Moon group. It should be emphasized that civic empowerment would be the best possible solution to save democratic values and institutions in the face of populist challenges. In the midst of antagonistic conflicts between two opposing political camps, civil society has become too divided to play a part in empowering citizens. The future of Korean democracy would be dependent upon whether a strong and sound civil society can be revitalized for civic empowerment. I suggest that civil dialogues between two antagonistic political camps will play a key role.

참고문헌 (83)

  1. Acemoglu, D., "Why Nations Fail" (2012), Crown
  2. The Emergence of Weak, Despotic and Inclusive States, "Acemoglu, D.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Papers No. 23657 (2017)
  3. Acuna, C. H., "Latin American Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives for the 1990s", pp.17~66 (1994), Transaction Publishers
  4. Bermeo, N., "On Democratic Backsliding", Journal of Democracy, 27(1), pp.5~19 (2016)
  5. Boli, J., "Constructing World Culture: International Non-Governmental Organizations since 1875" (1999), Stanford University Press
  6. Bonikowski, B., "The Populist Style in American Politics : Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952-1996", Social Forces, 94(4), pp.1593~1621 (2015)
  7. Borrego, J., "The Future of Global Conflict", pp.174~210 (1999), Sage
  8. Chang, W., "Online Civic Participation, and Political Empowerment : Online Media and Public Opinion Formation in Korea", Media, Culture & Society, 27(6), pp.925~935 (2005)
  9. Chang, W., "The Cyber Balkanization and Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere in Korea", Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 7(2), pp.29~48 (2008)
  10. 조영철, "문재인 정부 경제정책 평가", 경제와 사회, (120), pp.134~157 (2018), 비판사회학회[DOI]
  11. Dahl, R., "On Democracy" (1998), Yale University Press
  12. De Schweinitz, K., "Industrialization and Democracy : Economic Necessities and Political Possibilities" (1964), Free Press
  13. Diamond, L., "Facing up to the Democratic Recession", Journal of Democracy, 26(1), pp.141~155 (2015)
  14. The Economist Intelligence Unit, "Democracy Index 2020: In Sickness and in Health?", The Economist, ~ (2021)
  15. Evans, P. B., "Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil" (1976), Princeton University Press
  16. Evans, P. B., "The Handbook of Political Sociology", pp.655~670 (2012), Cambridge University Press
  17. Falk, R., "Global Visions: Beyond the New World Order", pp.39~50 (1993), South End Press
  18. Fieschi, C., "Populocracy : The Tyranny of Authenticity and the Rise of Populism" (2019), Agenda Publishing
  19. Fish, M. S., "Russia’s Fourth Transition", Journal of Democracy, 5(3), pp.31~42 (1994)
  20. Frantz, E., "Contemporary Democratic Breakdown and the Rise of Personalist Rule", The Annals of Comparative Democratization, 17(1) (2019)
  21. Gamarra, E. A., "Latin American Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives for the 1990s", pp.1~15 (1994), Transaction Publishers
  22. Gibson, L., "The Authoritarian Reflex", Harvard Magazine (2020)
  23. Haggard, S., "The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis" (2000), Institute for International Economics
  24. Haggard, S, "The Politics of Economic Adjustment" (1992), Princeton University Press
  25. Halperin, S., "In the Mirror of the Third World : Capitalist Development in Modern Europe" (1997), Cornell University Press
  26. Hauben, R., "Korea Yearbook. Volume 1. Politics, Economy and Society 2007" (2008), Brill.D
  27. Held, D, "Democracy in Crisis", pp.119~143 (2019), Bainsan
  28. Anti-Globalization : Beyond the Great Divide, "Globalization", pp.2007, Held, D.
  29. Hirshman, A. O., "A Bias for Hope : Essays on Development in Latin America" (1971), Yale University Press
  30. Huntington, S. P., "The Third Wave : Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century" (1991), University of Oklahoma Press
  31. Im, H. B., "Consolidating Democracy in South Korea" (2000), Lynne Rienner
  32. Kahler, M., "The Politics of International Debt" (1986), Cornell University Press
  33. Kahler, M., "Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World", pp.33~61 (1990), Princeton University Press
  34. Kang, D. J., "Internet Politics in South Korea: The Case of Rohsamo and Ohmynews", 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2007)
  35. Karl, T. L., "Modes of Transition in Southern and Eastern Europe, Southern and Central America", International Social Science Journal, 128, pp.268~284 (1991)
  36. Keck, M., "Activists beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics" (1998), Cornell University Press
  37. Kennedy, P., "Preparing for the Twenty-first Century" (1993), Vintage
  38. Kim, Y., "Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East Asia, Volume II: East Asia", pp.132~178 (1998), Ashgate
  39. Kim, E., "Capitulation to Capital? Ohmynews as Alternative Media", Media, Culture & Society, 28(4), pp.541~560 (2006)
  40. Kim, D. J., "Mass-Participatory Economy: Korea’s Road to World Economic Power" (1993), University Press of America, Inc
  41. Kim, K., "Democracy in Crisis", pp.15~29 (2019), Bainsan
  42. Kim, S., "Korea’s Globalization" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  43. Kurth, J. R., "The New Authoritarianism in Latin America" (1979), Princeton University Press
  44. 이창호, "포털 이용자들의 포털 뉴스이용패턴 및 포털의 언론역할에 관한 인식", 한국언론정보학보, 46(2), pp.177~211 (2009), 한국언론정보학회
  45. Lee, J., "Mobile Asia: Capitalisms, Value Chains and Mobile Telecommunication in Asia" (2018), Seoul National University Press
  46. Lele, J., "Geopolitics and Regionalism" (1996), Aldershot
  47. Lim, H., "Korea Confronts Globalization", pp.139~160 (2009), Routledge
  48. Lim, H., "Globalization and Development in East Asia", pp.161~181 (2012), Routeledge
  49. Lipset, S. M., "Some Social Requisites of Democracy", American Political Science Review, 53, pp.69~105 (1959)
  50. Mainwaring, S., "Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective", pp.294~341 (1992), University of Notre Dame Press
  51. Mill, J. S., "Consideration on Representative Government in Three Essays" (1983), Oxford University Press
  52. Mittelman, J. H., "The Globalization Syndrome : Transformation and Resistance" (2000), Princeton University Press
  53. Mitzner, M., "Fighting Illiberalism with Illiberalism : Islamist Populism and Democratic Deconsolidation in Indonesia", Pacific Affairs, 91(2), pp.261~282 (2018)
  54. Mouffe, C., "For A Left Populism" (2018), Verso
  55. Mudde, C, "The Populist Zeitgeist", Government and Opposition, 39(Autumn) (2004)
  56. Muller, J., "What is Populism?" (2016), University of Pennsylvania Press
  57. Nelson, J. M., "Fragile Coalitions: The Politics of Economic Adjustment" (1989), Transaction Books
  58. Nelson, J. M., "Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World" (1990), Princeton University Press
  59. O’Donnell, G., "Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism" (1979), Institute of International Studies, University of California
  60. O’Donnell, G., "The Global Divergence of Democracies", pp.113~130 (2001), Johns Hopkins University Press
  61. Pereira, C. B., "Latin American Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives for the 1990s", pp.181~212 (1994), Transaction Publishers
  62. Przeworski, A., "Crises of Democracy" (2019), Cambridge University Press
  63. Puddington, A., "A Return to the Iron Fist", Journal of Democracy, 26(2), pp.122~138 (2015)
  64. Putnam, R., "Democracy’s Victory and Crisis", pp.43~63 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  65. Repucci, S., "The Freedom House Survey for 2020 : Democracy in a Year of Crisis", Journal of Democracy, 32(2), pp.45~60 (2021)
  66. Robertson, R., "Globalization : Social Theory and Global Culture" (1993), Sage
  67. Rosanvallon, P., "Counter-democracy : Politics in an Age of Distrust" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  68. Rousseau, J., "The Social Contract" (1983), Penguin
  69. Schlesinger Jr., A. M., "The Imperial Presidency" (1973), Houghton Mifflin
  70. Schmitter, P. C., "The Consolidation of Democracy in Latin America" (1995), Lynne Rienner Publishers
  71. Seong, K. R., "Plan for a New Korea: Inclusive State" (2017), 21Century Books
  72. Smith, W. C., "Politics, Social Change, and Economic Restructuring in Latin America" (1997), North-South Center Press
  73. Smith, W. C., "Latin American Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives for the 1990s" (1994), Transaction Publishers
  74. Smith, W. C., "Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico" (1994), Transaction Publishers
  75. Song, Y., "Internet News Media and Issue Development: A Case Study on the Roles of the Independent Online News Services as Agenda-Builders for Anti-US Protests in South Korea", New Media & Society, 9(1), pp.71~92 (2007)
  76. Suh, B., "Populism: Crisis and Choice in Contemporary Democracy" (2008), Book World
  77. Tardanico, R., "Global Restructuring, Employment, and Social Inequality in Urban Latin America" (1997), North-South Center Press
  78. Veltmeyer, H., "Neoliberalism and Class Conflict in Latin America: A Comparative Perspective on the Political Economy of Structural Adjustment" (1997), Macmillan
  79. Wade, R., "Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of the Government in East Asian Industrialization" (1990), Princeton University Press
  80. Williamson, J., "Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?" (1990), Institute for International Development
  81. Williamson, J., "The Political Economy of Reform" (1994), Institute for International Development
  82. Wood, E. M., "Labor, the State and the Class Struggle", Monthly Review, 49, pp.1~17 (1997)
  83. Wuthrich F. M., "The Pushback Against Populism: Running on “Radical Love” in Turkey", Journal of Democracy, 31(2), pp.24~40 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)