본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 후기 鴨綠江과 柵門사이 封禁 地帶에 대한 역사·지리적 인식

Historical and Geographical Recognition of the Off-limits Zone between the Yalu River and Zahmen in Late Joseon

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The objective of this study was to survey the historical and geographical perception of the Chosun envoys’route from the Yalu River in Euijubu(義州府) to Zahmen(柵門) and, by doing so, to deepen the understanding of the opposite side in the lower reaches of the Yalu River, which has been studied relatively less. In this paper, Chapter Ⅱ presented the finding that, reaching Euijubu, the current of the Yalu River is divided into three streams, Aprok River(鴨綠江), Jung River(中江), and Sam River(三江), by islands in the middle of the river. In addition, according to old maps, Yongmanji(龍灣誌), etc., some of islands in the middle of the Aprok River were inhabited and cultivated, and even guarded by Chosun soldiers all the year round. Accordingly, the land across the Jung River was perceived an uninhabited land. Chapter Ⅲ examined the historical and cultural perception of the Chosun envoys’route across the Aprok River and throughout the Off-limits Zone. The crossing of the Aprok River was slightly different according to season and weather. The departure point was the Guryongyeon(九龍淵) Ferry to the northeast of Euijubu, and the arrival point was Jiuliancheng(九連城). Then, the Chosun envoy arrived in Zahmen via Tangzhan(湯站). Chosun people expressed a feeling of intimacy, thinking that the mountains and rivers in the region were not much different from those in their homeland. This intimacy was associated with their history that the area around Jiuliancheng, Zahmen and Fenghuangcheng(鳳凰城) had been Guknaeseong(國內城) or Ansiseong(安市城) of the Goguryo(高句麗) Dynasty. Chapter Ⅳ studied the situation and historical perception of Zahmen, the first gateway to willow walls(柳條邊), and Zahmen village. Zahmen was a practical boundary gate between Chosun and Qing where entrance and departure were reported and goods passed the customs. Zahmen village was a border town that prospered in trade thanks to the Chosun envoys’frequent coming and going. In the city, Chosun people could feel realistically the cultural difference between Chosun and Qing. On the contrary, however, this became a firm background supporting the perception that the Off-limits Zone, a borderland belonging neither to Chosun nor to Qing, was included in their territory historically and culturally. After all, the Chosun society’s heightened interest in the northern region since the mid 18th century was a consequence of such historical and cultural perception of the Off-limits zone and economic exchange with the area.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to survey the historical and geographical perception of the Chosun envoys’route from the Yalu River in Euijubu(義州府) to Zahmen(柵門) and, by doing so, to deepen the understanding of the opposite side in the lower reaches of the Yalu River, which has been studied relatively less. In this paper, Chapter Ⅱ presented the finding that, reaching Euijubu, the current of the Yalu River is divided into three streams, Aprok River(鴨綠江), Jung River(中江), and Sam River(三江), by islands in the middle of the river. In addition, according to old maps, Yongmanji(龍灣誌), etc., some of islands in the middle of the Aprok River were inhabited and cultivated, and even guarded by Chosun soldiers all the year round. Accordingly, the land across the Jung River was perceived an uninhabited land. Chapter Ⅲ examined the historical and cultural perception of the Chosun envoys’route across the Aprok River and throughout the Off-limits Zone. The crossing of the Aprok River was slightly different according to season and weather. The departure point was the Guryongyeon(九龍淵) Ferry to the northeast of Euijubu, and the arrival point was Jiuliancheng(九連城). Then, the Chosun envoy arrived in Zahmen via Tangzhan(湯站). Chosun people expressed a feeling of intimacy, thinking that the mountains and rivers in the region were not much different from those in their homeland. This intimacy was associated with their history that the area around Jiuliancheng, Zahmen and Fenghuangcheng(鳳凰城) had been Guknaeseong(國內城) or Ansiseong(安市城) of the Goguryo(高句麗) Dynasty. Chapter Ⅳ studied the situation and historical perception of Zahmen, the first gateway to willow walls(柳條邊), and Zahmen village. Zahmen was a practical boundary gate between Chosun and Qing where entrance and departure were reported and goods passed the customs. Zahmen village was a border town that prospered in trade thanks to the Chosun envoys’frequent coming and going. In the city, Chosun people could feel realistically the cultural difference between Chosun and Qing. On the contrary, however, this became a firm background supporting the perception that the Off-limits Zone, a borderland belonging neither to Chosun nor to Qing, was included in their territory historically and culturally. After all, the Chosun society’s heightened interest in the northern region since the mid 18th century was a consequence of such historical and cultural perception of the Off-limits zone and economic exchange with the area.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. "高麗史", ~
  2. "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
  3. "輿地圖書", ~
  4. "通文館志", ~
  5. "龍灣誌", ~
  6. "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
  7. "安東縣志", ~
  8. "鳳城縣志", ~
  9. "盛京通志", ~
  10. "大淸一統志", ~
  11. "燕轅直指", ~
  12. "戊午燕行錄", ~
  13. "心田稿", ~
  14. "山紀程", ~
  15. "谿谷先生集", ~
  16. "燕途紀行", ~
  17. "與猶堂全書", ~
  18. "燕行日記", ~
  19. "熱河日記", ~
  20. "赴燕日記", ~
  21. "夢經堂日史", ~
  22. "燕行錄", ~
  23. "陶谷集", ~
  24. "燕行記事", ~
  25. "湛軒書", ~
  26. "靑莊館全書", ~
  27. "東史綱目", ~
  28. "海東繹史", ~
  29. "稗官雜記", ~
  30. "練藜室記述", ~
  31. 고승희, "조선후기함경도상업연구" (2003), 국학자료원
  32. 김종원, "근세동아시아관계사연구-朝淸交涉과 東亞三國交易을 中心으로" (1999), 혜안
  33. 馬大正主, "中國邊疆經略史" (2003), 中州古籍出版社
  34. 馬大正, "중국의동북변강연구" (2004), 동북아역사재단
  35. 馬大正, "중국의국경·영토인식" (2004), 동북아역사재단
  36. 楊賓, "柳邊紀略" (1936)
  37. 梁泰鎭, "韓國邊境史硏究" (1990), 法經出版社
  38. 유승주, "조선후기중국과의무역사" (2002), 경인문화사
  39. 이철성, "조선후기대청무역사연구" (2000), 국학자료원
  40. 임기중, "연행록연구" (2002), 일지사
  41. 임지현, "근대의국경역사의변경-변경에서서역사를바라보다" (2005), 휴머니스트
  42. 任鴻魁, "丹東史迹" (2005), 遼寧民族出版社
  43. 張存武, "淸代中韓關係論文集" (1987), 臺灣商務印書館
  44. 최소자, "명청시대중·한관계사연구" (1997), 이화여자대학교출판부
  45. 한일관계사학회, "동아시아의영토와민족문제" (2008), 경인문화사
  46. 한정춘, "두만강압록강류역지명전설" (2006), 연변인민출판사
  47. 강석화, "조선후기평안도지역압록강변의방어체계", 한국문화, 34 (2004)
  48. 고승희, "19세기후반 함경도육진과 만주지역 교역의성격", 조선시대사학보, 25 (2003)
  49. 高丞嬉, "19세기 후반 함경도 변경지역과 연해주의 교역 활동", 조선시대사학보, (28), pp.159~189 (2004), 조선시대사학회
  50. 김득황, "조선의북방강계에관하여", 백산학보, 41 (1993)
  51. 김춘선, "압록·두만강 국경문제에 관한 한·중 양국의 연구동향", 한국사학보, 12 (2002)
  52. 김현영, "조선후기朝·淸邊境의인구와국경인식", 한국사론, 41 (2004)
  53. 金慧子, "朝鮮後期北邊越境問題硏究", 梨大史苑, 18 (1982)
  54. 박범, "18세기후반의주부재원조달방식의변화", 석사, pp.2009
  55. 박선영, "국민 국가·경계·민족―근대 중국의 국경의식을 통해 본 국민국가 형성과 과제―", 동양사학연구, 81, pp.4~ (2003), 동양사학회
  56. 박선영, "近代 東아시아의 國境認識과 間島 - 지도에 나타난 한중 국경선 변화를 중심으로 -", 중국사연구, (32), pp.199~234 (2004), 중국사학회
  57. 박선영, "중국학계의 조선과 청조간 국경영토 논리와 그한계", 한국사론, 40 (2004)
  58. 배우성, "정조시대 동아시아 인식의 새로운 경향", 한국학보, 94 (1999)
  59. 서인범, "압록강하구 沿岸島嶼를 둘러싼 朝明 영토분쟁", 명청사연구, (26), pp.31~68 (2006), 명청사학회
  60. 이승수, "燕行路上의 공간 탐색, 鳳凰山城: 安市城說과 관련하여", 정신문화연구, 29(2), pp.367~388 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
  61. 이철성, "17세기平安道‘江邊7邑’의방어체제", 韓國史學報, 13, pp.11~ (2002), 고려사학회
  62. 이철성, "戊午燕行錄을통해추적한黃沁·金有山의북경길 in : 한국근현대사와종교문화", 천주교호남교회사연구 (2003)
  63. 정혜중, "청대 조선인과 청국인 범월의 특징: 양국 범월사례의 분석을 중심으로", 명청사연구, (26), pp.69~88 (2006), 명청사학회
  64. 최남희, "고구려지명‘안시성’의재고찰", 국어교육연구, 36 (2004)
  65. 崔熙在, "光緖初淸朝의滿洲開發과中韓關係의再調整", 東洋學, 35 (2004)
  66. 秋月望, "鴨綠江北岸の統巡會哨について", 九州大學東洋史論集, 11 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)