본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북송 초 송·서하 전쟁 발발과 확전

The Outbreak and Escalation of the Song-Western Xia War in the Early Northern Song Period

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In the ninth century, East Asia was faced with a complicated international situation: the north-south axis (the Khitans and Song China), the eastwest axis (Western Xia and Goryeo), and several countries (including Turfan, Huigu and Southern Zhao) competed against each other. On the other hand, there began to emerge a “reversal of power” between the dynasty in central China and the dynasty of the northern border region. Among these ancient kingdoms, Western Xia was the most measurable dynasty. First, Western Xia could not threaten the existence of its counterparts: the Khitans, Song China, or Jin. Also, they could not overwhelm Western Xia through military power. Although Western Xia was a small country the distant from central region, it was able to keep challenging Song China, and to put more pressure on Song China than the Khitans. It is interesting to note that the only enemy threatening Western Xia was not the Khitans, the great power, but Song China. To generally understand this period, it is necessary to analyze the huayi concept (華夷論), the ancient Chinese strategy of surrounding countries and ethnic groups (以夷制夷), the concept of link relations,and financial policies. In is also necessary to examine the concept of territory in Song China, the authenticity of Taizong, the change of foreign policies with the loss to the Khitans, the checks and balances of military power in Song China, and the Khitans position against Song China and Western Xia. This paper seeks to examine the relations between Song China and Western Xia during the reign of Taizong. Whereas Emperor Taizu had adopted a positive policy of appeasement toward the northwestern regions, Taizong handled the internal conflict in Dangxiang (党項) with more haste than caution, with his political ambition of authenticity. Finally, this contributed to cause a prolonged war of nearly 100 years. He lacked the military and political talent,moreover, He suffered from stress while striving to outperform Taizu. This made a decisive diplomatic situation more worse. Li Jiqian (李繼遷) defended his homeland against Song China’s attack with a guerrilla war which made effective use of the geographical features of the desert. and finally he was successful in establishing an independent regime with the support of the Khitans. Taizong, who had already lost his justification and practical benefits, adopted an appeasement policy, but this was too late to change the situation. What was worse, he suffered humiliation at the refusal of his offer of obedient vassal. Eventually, Song China was confronted with a severe political and military crisis in the last period of Taizong. His successor,Emperor Zhenzong had no choice but to sustain stability through the payment of annual tribute. Most of the fundamental problems in the Song dynasty were deeply rooted in the political failure of Taizong. At the same time, it came to be a major cause of failure in the foreign policy towards Western Xia.

Abstract

In the ninth century, East Asia was faced with a complicated international situation: the north-south axis (the Khitans and Song China), the eastwest axis (Western Xia and Goryeo), and several countries (including Turfan, Huigu and Southern Zhao) competed against each other. On the other hand, there began to emerge a “reversal of power” between the dynasty in central China and the dynasty of the northern border region. Among these ancient kingdoms, Western Xia was the most measurable dynasty. First, Western Xia could not threaten the existence of its counterparts: the Khitans, Song China, or Jin. Also, they could not overwhelm Western Xia through military power. Although Western Xia was a small country the distant from central region, it was able to keep challenging Song China, and to put more pressure on Song China than the Khitans. It is interesting to note that the only enemy threatening Western Xia was not the Khitans, the great power, but Song China. To generally understand this period, it is necessary to analyze the huayi concept (華夷論), the ancient Chinese strategy of surrounding countries and ethnic groups (以夷制夷), the concept of link relations,and financial policies. In is also necessary to examine the concept of territory in Song China, the authenticity of Taizong, the change of foreign policies with the loss to the Khitans, the checks and balances of military power in Song China, and the Khitans position against Song China and Western Xia. This paper seeks to examine the relations between Song China and Western Xia during the reign of Taizong. Whereas Emperor Taizu had adopted a positive policy of appeasement toward the northwestern regions, Taizong handled the internal conflict in Dangxiang (党項) with more haste than caution, with his political ambition of authenticity. Finally, this contributed to cause a prolonged war of nearly 100 years. He lacked the military and political talent,moreover, He suffered from stress while striving to outperform Taizu. This made a decisive diplomatic situation more worse. Li Jiqian (李繼遷) defended his homeland against Song China’s attack with a guerrilla war which made effective use of the geographical features of the desert. and finally he was successful in establishing an independent regime with the support of the Khitans. Taizong, who had already lost his justification and practical benefits, adopted an appeasement policy, but this was too late to change the situation. What was worse, he suffered humiliation at the refusal of his offer of obedient vassal. Eventually, Song China was confronted with a severe political and military crisis in the last period of Taizong. His successor,Emperor Zhenzong had no choice but to sustain stability through the payment of annual tribute. Most of the fundamental problems in the Song dynasty were deeply rooted in the political failure of Taizong. At the same time, it came to be a major cause of failure in the foreign policy towards Western Xia.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 戴錫章, "西夏紀" (1988), 寧夏人民出版社
  2. 范鎭, "東齋記事" (1997), 中華書局
  3. 徐夢莘, "三朝北盟會編" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  4. 徐松, "宋會要輯稿" (1997), 中華書局
  5. 王稱, "東都事略" (1997), 中華書局
  6. 李燾, "續資治通鑑長編" (2004), 中華書局
  7. 李攸, "宋朝事實" (1995), 中華書局
  8. 陳均, "九朝編年備要" (2006), 中華書局
  9. 脫脫, "遼史" (1993), 中華書局
  10. 脫脫, "宋史" (1995), 中華書局
  11. 脫脫, "金史" (1995), 中華書局
  12. 杜建錄, "西夏與周邊民族關系史" (1995), 甘肅文化出版社
  13. 廖隆盛, "國際貿易戰爭" (2002), 萬卷樓
  14. 吳天墀, "西夏史稿" (2006), 廣西師範大學出版社
  15. 王天順, "西夏戰史" (1996), 寧夏人民出版社
  16. 劉浦江, "松漠之間: 遼金契丹女眞史硏究" (2008), 中華書局
  17. 李華瑞, "宋夏關系史" (1998), 河北人民出版社
  18. 李華瑞, "宋夏史硏究" (2006), 天津古籍出版社
  19. 張其凡, "宋代政治軍事論稿" (2009), 安徽人民出版社
  20. 陳寅恪, "唐代政治史述論稿 (陳寅恪先生文集③)" (1982), 里仁書局
  21. 湯開建, "党項西夏史探微" (2005), 允晨文化
  22. 金容完, "北宋과 遼·夏 邊境上의 密貿易 問題", 濟州史學, 3 (1987)
  23. 金渭顯, "契丹의 對西夏政策①", 白山學報, 32 (1985)
  24. 金渭顯, "契丹의 對西夏政策②", 白山學報, 33 (1986)
  25. 金渭顯, "西夏與宋·契丹之關係(986~1048)", 明知史論, 7 (1995)
  26. 金渭顯, "‘宋史筌’西夏列傳, 宋史硏究論文集" (2002), 河北大學出版社
  27. 朴志焄, "宋代華夷論硏究", 박사, pp.1990
  28. 朴志焄, "北宋의 對外經濟關係와 華夷觀: 對遼·西夏關係를 中心으로", 梨花史學硏究, 19 (1990)
  29. 安俊光, "宋·夏戰爭에 對하여", 陸軍3士官學校論文集, 39 (1994)
  30. 安俊光, "宋·夏7年戰爭에 對하여", 陸軍3士官學校論文集, 44 (1997)
  31. 梁鍾國, "북송초 帝權 확립과 태종정권의 성격", 송요금원사연구, 4 (2000)
  32. 葛兆光, "宋代‘中國’意識的凸顯", 文史哲, pp.1~ (2004)
  33. 羅矛昆, "李繼遷攻取灵州對西夏建國的作用", 寧夏社會科學, pp.3~ (1981)
  34. 隴 夫, "試論宋·夏與吐蕃關系的幾個問題", 甘肅民族硏究, pp.4~ (1991)
  35. 徐 庄, "試論李繼遷的歷史作用", 寧夏大學學報, pp.4~ (1981)
  36. 王天順, "試論宋夏戰爭中雙方戰略地位的變化", 寧夏社會科學, pp.3~ (1994)
  37. 劉建麗, "宋夏戰爭中的秦州吐蕃", 寧夏社會科學, pp.4~ (1996)
  38. 李克武, "李繼棒‘入覲納土’析論", 華中師大學報, pp.3~ (1988)
  39. 李 蔚, "宋夏橫山之爭述論", 民族硏究, pp.6~ (1987)
  40. 李華瑞, "貿易與西夏侵宋的關系", 寧夏社會科學, pp.3~ (1997)
  41. 張 煉, "論北宋對西夏外交的失敗", 西南民族學院學報, pp.5~ (1994)
  42. 趙繼顏, "北宋仁宗時的宋夏陝西之戰", 齊魯學刊, pp.4~ (1980)
  43. 趙一匡, "宋夏對立與河湟地區的民族關系", 蘭州學刊, pp.4~ (1987)
  44. 陳炳應, "遼夏關系及其相互政策", 寧夏社會科學, pp.4~ (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)