본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

장애인 빈곤 감소 및 고용률에 대한 장애인 정책 조합

A configuration of disability policy of poverty reduction and employment rates for persons with disabilities

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

이 연구는 OECD 18개 국가를 대상으로 어떠한 장애인정책이 장애인 빈곤 감소 및 고용률의 원인조건이 될 수 있는지를 분석하였다. 차별법제, 소득보장정책, 고용정책이 결합하여 장애인 빈곤 감소 및 고용률에 원인조건이 될 수 있는지 탐색하기 위하여 퍼지셋 질적비교 분석(f/s QCA)을 사용하였다. 이 연구의 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 장애인 정책조합이 장애인 빈곤 감소의 원인조건이 될 수 있는지를 분석한 결과, 필요조건과 충분조건 모두에서 고용정책은 장애인 빈곤을 설명하는 핵심적인 조건이었다. 또한 소득보장정책과 고용정책이 결합하여 빈곤 감소에 긍정적인 성과를 보였다. 둘째, 장애인 정책조합이 장애인 고용률의 원인조건이 될 수 있는지를 분석한 결과, 고용정책은 장애인 고용 성과를 설명하는 핵심적인 조건이었다. 장애인정책이 소극적일지라도 강력한 고용정책과 결합하여 높은 장애인 고용률에 긍정적인 성과를 보였다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 바탕으로 우리나라의 장애인정책에 대한 실증적인 함의를 제시하였다.

Abstract

This study analyzed which disability policies can be the cause of poverty reduction and employment rates for persons with disabilities in 18 OECD countries. For this purpose, fuzzy set qualitative comparison analysis (f/s QCA) was used. The findings of this study are as follows. First, The results from analyzing which configuration of disability policy can be the causal condition for poverty reduction among the disabled are as follows: First, as a result of verifying the necessary conditions that explain the poverty rate of the disabled, it was confirmed that the poverty rate of the disabled is explained when the income security policy is weak and the employment policy is weak. As a result of verifying the necessary conditions for low poverty rate of the disabled, it was found that the poverty rate of the disabled is low when the employment policy is strong. Second, as a result of verifying the sufficient conditions that explain the poverty rate of the disabled, the configuration of weak income security policy and employment policy was confirmed to be such a condition. Third, as a result of verifying the sufficient conditions for low poverty rate of the disabled, two configurations were confirmed: i) strong employment policy and ii) weak discrimination legislation combined with strong income security policy. Next, the analysis to determine the configuration of disability policy that could be the causal conditions of the employment rate of the disabled yielded the following results. First, as a result of verifying the necessary conditions that explain the employment rate of the disabled, it was found that none of the conditions pass the standard. Second, as a result of verifying the sufficient conditions that explain high employment rate of the disabled, two configurations were found to explain high employment rate of the disabled: i) weak income security policy combined with strong employment policy, and ii) weak discrimination legislation combined with strong employment policy. Third, as a result of verifying the sufficient conditions that explain low employment rate of the disabled, the configuration of weak discrimination legislation, income security policy and employment policy was found to be such a condition. Based on these research results, empirical implications for Korea's disability policy were presented.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 강지원, "OECD SOCX에 나타난 장애인소득보장체계 국제비교", 보건복지포럼, 181, pp.87~93 (2011)
  2. 권기돈, "OECD 국가 장애인 정책모델: 고용제도와 장애인 고용 지표의 상관성에 대한 분석", 장애와 고용, 26(2), pp.49~73 (2016), 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원[DOI]
  3. 장애인 복지지표를 통해 살펴 본 OECD 국가의 장애인정책 비교 연구, "김성희", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2011)
  4. 김현지, "2020 장애인통계연보", 한국장애인개발원, ~ (2020)
  5. OECD 회원국의 장애인정책 연구, "김형식", 한국장애인고용촉진공단 고용개발원, ~ (2005)
  6. 남재욱, "OECD 주요국의 노동시장정책과 빈곤 및 고용성과 비교연구", 노동정책연구, 17(3), pp.113~153 (2017), 한국노동연구원[DOI]
  7. 남찬섭, "장애인 고용실태의 특성 및 그 배경과 개선방향", 사회복지정책, (33), pp.31~59 (2008), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
  8. 오욱찬, "장애인에 대한 합리적 편의제공 의무 분석: OECD 국가에 대한 비교법 연구", 한국장애인복지학, 32(32), pp.245~274 (2016), 한국장애인복지학회[DOI]
  9. 이수경, "OECD 10개국의 장애인 고용률의 변화에 대한 연구: 패널수정 표준오차(PCSE) 분석의 활용", 사회복지연구, 48(1), pp.5~21 (2017), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
  10. 이소영, "OECD국가의 장애정책 패러다임 전환", 글로벌사회복지연구, 1(1), pp.32~52 (2011)
  11. 이승윤, "퍼지셋 질적 비교연구 방법론의 이론과 적용" (2014), 고려대학교출판부
  12. 정민섭, "장애인복지관대성에 영향을 미치는 원인조건에 관한 연구", 사회복지정책, 44(2), pp.239~262 (2017), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
  13. EU 및 OECD 국가 장애인복지지표 연구, "조윤화", 한국장애인개발원, ~ (2014)
  14. 주영하, "장애인정책 유형화와 국제비교", 박사, pp.2021
  15. 주영하, "장애인정책 유형화: 차별법제, 소득보장정책, 고용정책을 중심으로", 비판사회정책, (74), pp.239~272 (2022), 비판과 대안을 위한 사회복지학회[DOI]
  16. Bagenstos, S. R., "Comparative disability employment law from an American perspective", Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 24(4), pp.649~667 (2003)
  17. Barnow, B. S., "The employment rate of people with disabilities", Monthly Labour Review, 131(44), pp.44~50 (2008)
  18. Bell, D., "The disability discrimination act in the UK : Helping or hindering employment among the disabled?", Journal of Health Economics, 28, pp.465~480 (2008)
  19. Ben-Shalom, Y., "Oxford handbook of economics of poverty online" (2011), Oxford University Press
  20. Böheim, R., "Transforming Disability into Ability : Results and Conclusions from the OECD Study of Disability Policies for the Working-Age Population in 20 Member Countries", Int J Soc Welfare, 27, pp.168~185 (2018)
  21. Burkhauser, R. V., "Disability benefit growth and disability reform in the US : Lessons from other OECD nations", IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3(1), pp.1~30 (2014)
  22. "Comparative analysis ofanti-discrimination law in Europe 2018" (2018)[URL]
  23. Active Labour Market Policies in International Context: What Works Best? Lessons for the UK, "Daguerre, A.", DWP, ~, pp.Department for Work and Pensions, Working Paper 59 (2009)
  24. Deacon, B., "Global Social Policy: international Organizations and the Future of welfare" (1997), Sage
  25. Epstein, J., "Method and Substance in Macro-Comparative Analysis", pp.67~90 (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  26. Fuchs, M., "Quota Systems for Disabled Persons: Parameters, Aspects, Effectivity (Policy Brief)", European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, ~ (2014)
  27. Grover, C., "Social security, employment and incapacity benefit : Critical reflections on a new deal for welfare", Disability & Society, 22(7), pp.733~746 (2007)
  28. Ji Sun Lee, "The effects of income transfers on poverty reduction in people with disabilities in South Korea", Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 12(1), pp.29~37 (2018), 한국사회복지학회
  29. Hegre, H., "Poverty and Civil War Events", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), pp.598~623 (2009)
  30. Mullen, K., "Disability Benefit Generosity and Labor Force Withdrawal", Journal of Public Economics, 143, pp.49~63 (2016)
  31. Murtin, F., "The Ins and Outs of Unemployment" (2013), OECD Publishing
  32. OECD, "Sickness, Disability and Work" (2009), OECD Publishing
  33. OECD, "Sickness, disability and work. Breaking the barriers. Synthesis report" (2010), OECD Publishing
  34. OECD, "Towards Better Social and Employment Security in Korea. Connecting People with Jobs" (2018), OECD Publishing
  35. Pope, D., "Has the disability discrimination act closed the employment gap?", Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(20), pp.1261~1266 (2005)
  36. Ragin, C., "Fuzzy-Set Social Science" (2000), The University of Chicago Press
  37. Ragin, C., "Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy sets and Beyond" (2008), University of Chicago Press
  38. Wang, C., "The redistributive effect of social transfer programmes and taxes : A decomposition across countries", International Social Security Review, 65(3), pp.27~48 (2012)
  39. Waddington, L. B., "Disability Rights Law and Policy, International and National Perspectives" (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)