Edge Feature의 필요성과 EPP Feature의 위상
The necessity of EF and status of EPP feature.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to find out the necessity of EF(Edge Feature) and status of EPP(Extended Projection Principle) feature within the MP(Minimalist Program). EPP has been the main issue for the researchers from the beginning of the MP. But, in recent years, researchers have become increasingly interested in studying EF. By coming to the fore of EF, these two notions are being used simultaneously but somewhat confusing, because many parts of the nature of EPP are overlapped with the nature of EF. In order to explain many syntactic problems with uniformity, the notions of these two main features of MP have to be separated and they have to find their own place properly. So, this paper suggests that EPP feature is only related with the generating sentence by obligatory movement, whereas EF feature is related to the semantic and pragmatic function of sentence derivation together with all other movements including obligatory and optional movements.
Abstract
This paper attempts to find out the necessity of EF(Edge Feature) and status of EPP(Extended Projection Principle) feature within the MP(Minimalist Program). EPP has been the main issue for the researchers from the beginning of the MP. But, in recent years, researchers have become increasingly interested in studying EF. By coming to the fore of EF, these two notions are being used simultaneously but somewhat confusing, because many parts of the nature of EPP are overlapped with the nature of EF. In order to explain many syntactic problems with uniformity, the notions of these two main features of MP have to be separated and they have to find their own place properly. So, this paper suggests that EPP feature is only related with the generating sentence by obligatory movement, whereas EF feature is related to the semantic and pragmatic function of sentence derivation together with all other movements including obligatory and optional movements.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김광섭, "주어제약과 상승", 현대문법연구, (49), pp.1~19 (2007), 현대문법학회
- 김동석, "자연 언어의 비정규적 주어에 대한 통합적 연구 (I) -한국어와 일본어의 비정규적 주어를 중심으로-", 현대문법연구, (45), pp.33~76 (2006), 현대문법학회
- 김대익, "국면과 문자화와 동사이동", 현대문법연구, (60), pp.1~20 (2010), 현대문법학회
- 김선웅, "A study on the EPP in the minimalist program: EPP as a PF requirement", 현대문법연구, 24, pp.47~66 (2001)
- 김선웅, "On the Elimination of the EPP", 인문사회과학연구, 29(1), pp.78~95 (2001)
- 김선웅, "초점, 일치, 이동 및 C-T 의존관계", 생성문법연구, 18(2), pp.309~327 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- 김양순, "생물언어학과 통사론의 진화적 타당성", 언어연구, 25(1), pp.47~68 (2009), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- 김용하, "비정규적 주어와 일치", Proceedings of KGGC-SMOG Fall Conference on Linguistics (2006), 대구대학교
- 박승혁, "최소주의 프로그램과 확대 투사 원리", 현대문법연구, (27), pp.1~35 (2002), 현대문법학회
- 양동휘, "최소주의가설" (2003), 한국문화사
- 양동휘, "Scrambling and Interpretive Complex", 언어학, 13(2), pp.169~193 (2005), 대한언어학회
- 주치운, "확대투사원리의 제거와 대안 분석", Journal of British & American Stdies, 19, pp.127~151 (2008), 영미연구소
- Baltin, M. R, "Floating Quantifiers, PRO and Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 26, pp.199~248 (1995)
- Boeckx, C, "Quirky Agreement", Studia Linguistica, 54, pp.354~380 (2000)
- Boeckx, C, "Patterns of Subject Externalization across Experiencers" (2002), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
- Bošković, Z, "The syntax of non-finite complementation" (1997), MIT
- Chomsky, N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), The Netherlands Foris Publication
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by Phase, In Ken Hale : A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "On Phases" (2005), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "On Phases. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, In Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "The theory of principles and parameters, In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol.1", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
- Dikken, M, "Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Couplars" (2006), MIT Press
- Dikken, M, "Phase Extension" (2006), MIT Press
- Dikken, M, "Phase Extension: Contours of a Theory of the Role of Head Movement in Phrasal Extraction" (2007), CUNY Graduate Center
- Epstein, S., "EPP in T: More controversial subjects", Syntax, 8, pp.65~80 (2005)
- Gerdts, D, "Korean Psych Construction: Advancement or Retreat?", CLS, 24, pp.155~175 (1988)
- Haegeman, L, "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, 2nd Ed" (1992), Blackwell
- Haegeman, L, "Logical Form" (1995), Basil Blackwell
- Susumu Kuno, "On Some Syntactico-Pragmatic Properties of Postnominal Prepositional Phrases", 언어와 정보 사회, 10, pp.57~96 (2009), 언어정보연구소
- Lasnik, H, "A note on Pseudo-gapping, Papers on Minimalist Syntax, In Linguistics 27" (1995), MIT Press
- Lasnik, H, "A note on the EPP", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.356~386 (2001)
- Lasnik, H, "Conceptions of the Cycle, In Wh-movement: moving on", pp.197~216 (2006), MIT Press
- McCloskey, J, "Quantifier float and Wh-movement in an Irish English", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.57~84 (2000)
- Miyagawa, S, "On the EPP", To appear in Proceeding of the EPP, 2004, ~[DOI]
- Miyagawa, S, "Unifying agreement and agreement-less languages", To appear in Proceedings of WAFL2 (2005), MIT
- Pesetsky, D, "The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features" (2004), MIT Press
- Radford, A, "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Rizzi, L, "The structure of CP and IP, In The cartography of syntactic structures Vol.2", pp.16~51 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Williams, E, "Against Small Clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.287~308 (1983)