본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독일 도산법상 자기관리제도의 개정과 보호막절차의 도입

Amendment of Self-Management System by ESUG(Das Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unternehmen) and Introduction of Protection-Shield Proceedings(Schutzschirmverfahren) in Germany

김경욱
한국경영법률학회 (The Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration And Law)|2012.10|경영법률 (Journal of Business Administration & Law)|제23권 제1호|pp. 395-428

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

자기관리(EigenverwaltungSelf-Management)보호막절차(Schutzs- chirmverfahrenProtection-Shield Proceedings)기업회생(Rehabilitation of Corporations)기존 경영자 관리인 제도(modified DIP System)도산계획(Rehabilitation Plan)
주제분류법학

초록

The German Insolvency Act, being enforced since 1. Jan. 1999, has been amended until today several times, but the amendment of 2011 was an essential revision of it in terms of its scale and contents. Discussions on this amendment begun on July 2010, focusing on rehabilitation of corporations, and the German Government submitted the draft of “Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unterhehmen” to the German Parliament. This Bill passed Bundestag on 27. May 2011, and Bundesrat on 25. Nov. 2011. Finally it was announced as Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unterhehmen (ESUG) under the Federal Official Gazette of Germany. Articles 4, 5, 7 and 8 of this Act will come into force from 1. Jan. 2013, and the rest of them are already in force since 1. Mar. 2012. This article is on the amendment of Self-Management System which has very close relationship with the rehabilitation of corporations. Protection-Shield Proceedings(§ 270b InsO) that became valid since Mar. 2012 is the main substance of the amendment. German Self- Management System is similar to modified DIP(Debtor in Possession) System in Korea under § 74 (2) Korean Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act because they both appoint debtors as trustees of debtor’s property, but their specific procedure shows considerable differences. Thus, this article closely figured out details of German Self- Management System, the amendment on it through ESUG, and the Protection-Shield Proceedings. Furthermore, it examined modified DIP System in Korea which has similarity with German Self-Management System, considering Korean System’s institutional meaning. Lastly, the article made reflections on the implications that the amendment of German Self-Management System can suggest to Korean Insolvency Acts.

Abstract

The German Insolvency Act, being enforced since 1. Jan. 1999, has been amended until today several times, but the amendment of 2011 was an essential revision of it in terms of its scale and contents. Discussions on this amendment begun on July 2010, focusing on rehabilitation of corporations, and the German Government submitted the draft of “Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unterhehmen” to the German Parliament. This Bill passed Bundestag on 27. May 2011, and Bundesrat on 25. Nov. 2011. Finally it was announced as Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unterhehmen (ESUG) under the Federal Official Gazette of Germany. Articles 4, 5, 7 and 8 of this Act will come into force from 1. Jan. 2013, and the rest of them are already in force since 1. Mar. 2012. This article is on the amendment of Self-Management System which has very close relationship with the rehabilitation of corporations. Protection-Shield Proceedings(§ 270b InsO) that became valid since Mar. 2012 is the main substance of the amendment. German Self- Management System is similar to modified DIP(Debtor in Possession) System in Korea under § 74 (2) Korean Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act because they both appoint debtors as trustees of debtor’s property, but their specific procedure shows considerable differences. Thus, this article closely figured out details of German Self- Management System, the amendment on it through ESUG, and the Protection-Shield Proceedings. Furthermore, it examined modified DIP System in Korea which has similarity with German Self-Management System, considering Korean System’s institutional meaning. Lastly, the article made reflections on the implications that the amendment of German Self-Management System can suggest to Korean Insolvency Acts.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김재형, "관리인 제도의 개선방안에 대한 검토 -미국의 DIP제도의 수용문제-", BFL, (9), pp.23~ (2005)
  2. 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상) 제3판" (2011), 박영사
  3. 서울지방법원, "회사정리실무" (2002)
  4. 송옥렬, "DIP제도 하에서 회생기업의 지배구조, In 세계화시대의 기업법(橫川 李基秀 先生 停年記念論文集)", pp.237~ (2010)
  5. 오수근, "통합도산법의 과제와 전망(Ⅰ)", 저스티스, (85), pp.5~20 (2005), 한국법학원
  6. 유해용, "기존 경영자 관리인 제도의 明暗", 저스티스, (117), pp.32~71 (2010), 한국법학원
  7. 이연갑, "도산법상 기존경영자 관리인의 지위", 비교사법, 16(1), pp.397~424 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
  8. 이진만, "한국에서의 도산법의 개정", 민사소송, 7(2), pp.56~82 (2003), 한국민사소송법학회
  9. 장병섭, "도산기업의 지배구조에 관한 연구", 재산법연구, 24(1), pp.273~305 (2007), 한국재산법학회
  10. 정재곤, "통합도산법상 管理人制度의 改善方案", 중앙법학, 7(2), pp.341~361 (2005), 중앙법학회
  11. 최찬욱, "통합도산법상 기존 경영자 관리인 제도에 대한 고찰", 기업소송연구, 5, pp.394~ (2007)
  12. Andres, Dirk, "Insolvenzordnung (Kommentar), 1. Aufl" (2006), Verlag C. H. Ceck
  13. Bork, Reinhard, "Einführung in das Insolvenzrecht, 5. Aufl" (2009), Mohr Siebeck
  14. Braun, Eberhard, "Insolvenzordnung (Kommentar), 4. Aufl" (2010), Veralg C. H. Beck
  15. Dahl, Michael, "Die Neuregelungen des ESUG – ein Überblick", NJW-Spezial, Heft, 1, pp.21~ (2012)
  16. Deutscher Bundestag, "Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unternehmen", Drucksache, 17(5712), pp.4~ (2011)
  17. Frind, Frank, "Zum Diskussionsentwurf für ein “Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unternehmen”, Teil 2: Die Regelungen zum Insolvenzplanverfahren, Eigenverwaltung, Insolvenzstatistikgesetz etc", ZInsO, 35, pp.1524~ (2010)
  18. Göb, Marc Alexander, "Das Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unternehmen(ESUG)", NZG, 10, pp.371~ (2012)
  19. Graf-Schlicker, "Der Einfluss des ESUG auf die Tätigkeit der Insolvenzgerichte", WPg Sonderheft, 1, pp.55~ (2011)
  20. Häsemeyer, Ludwig, "Insolvenzrecht, 4. Aufl" (2007), Carl Heymanns Verlag
  21. Hess, Harald, "Insolvenzrecht (Kommentar), Band II" (2007), C. F. Müller Verlag
  22. Hofmann, Matthias, "Die Vorschläge des DiskE-ESUG zur Eigenverwaltung und zur Auswahl des Sachwalters – Wege und Irrwege zur Erleichterung von Unternehmenssanierungen", NZI, 20, pp.798~ (2010)
  23. Kreft, Gerhart, "Heidelberger Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung, 4. Aufl" (2006), C. F. Müller Verlag
  24. Römermann, Volker, "Neues Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht durch das ESUG", NJW, pp.645~ (2012)
  25. Schelo, Sven, "Der neue § 270b InsO - Wie stabil ist das Schutzs- chirmverfahren in der Praxis?", ZIP, 15, pp.712~ (2012)
  26. Schmidt, Andreas, "Ablauf des sog. Schutzschirmverfahrens nach § 270b InsO", ZIP, 20, pp.963~ (2012)
  27. Trams, Kai, "Verwalterwahl nach ESUG –Revolution oder Sturm im Wasserglas?", NJW-Spezial, Heft, 5, pp.149~ (2012)
  28. Uhlenbruck, Wilhelm, "Insolvenzordnung (Kommentar), 13. Aufl" (2010), Verlag Franz Vahlen
  29. Vallender, Heinz, "Das neue Schutzschirmverfahren nach dem ESUG", GmbHR, 8, pp.450~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

독일의 기업구조개선법제 일고찰장원규한국채무자회생법학회 · 회생법학2023 · 제26호The Dilemma of Debtor-In-Possession Management in China and its Legislative Responses王心茹한국채무자회생법학회 · 회생법학2023 · 제26호독일 도산법제의 동향과 시사점김경욱한국사법학회 · 비교사법2002 · 제9권 제4호기업지배구조론의 회생기업에 대한 적용방안안정상한국경영법률학회 · 경영법률2010 · 제21권 제1호독일의 2009년 회사 관계법 개정과 시사점최병규한국경영법률학회 · 경영법률2010 · 제21권 제1호외국도산절차의 대내적 효력에 관한 비교 고찰김영주법학연구원 · 성균관법학2010 · 제22권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)

보험업에 대한 금융법적 감독과 경쟁법적 규제간의 관계박영준pp. 1-37동북아 경제중심국가와 한국‧중국‧일본 투자협정 - 아시아 지역주의의 맥락에서 -김대원pp. 39-64동북아 경제중심 국가에 따른 프랜차이즈 (가맹사업) 법제 정비 방향염규석pp. 65-93K-POP시대 엔터테인먼트법제의 정비방향장재옥pp. 95-125미국 델라웨어주 회사법이 우리 회사법에 미친 영향김정호pp. 127-171
원문 보기