외국도산절차의 대내적 효력에 관한 비교 고찰
A Comparative Study on the Inbound Effect of Foreign Proceeding in Cross-Border Insolvency
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, from 2006, the new era of bankruptcy law governing international insolvency began. The previous three bankruptcy laws -Bankruptcy Act, Composition Act, and Corporate Reorganization Act -have been merged into, and were replaced by, the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act of Korea. One of the most important changes on the Act (DRBAK) is the introduction of “universalism” of an international insolvency part. Although Korea established new universalism system with respect to international insolvency problems, the research and the study of effects and values of new system is still necessary. Under the DRBAK, in cases where the debtor has his/her place of business, his/her office or his/her domicile in a nation in which an application is filed for foreign bankruptcy procedures, the representative of such foreign bankruptcy procedures may file an application accompanied by a written statements falling under each of the Article 631 (1) with the court for approving the foreign bankruptcy procedures. Upon receiving an application filed for approving foreign bankruptcy procedures, the court shall decide whether to approve them on which such application is filed. In cases falling under any of the following, the court shall dismiss an application filed for approving foreign bankruptcy procedures: ① Where expenses determined by the court are not prepaid; ② Where each written statement provided for in each subparagraphs of Article 631 (1) is not submitted or the establishment and contents of any such written statement is not bona fide; and ③ Where approving the foreign bankruptcy procedures is contrary to the good public morals and social order of the Republic of Korea. The court may make a decision falling under any of the Article 636 (1) in order to protect the debtor s business and assets or the creditors profits at the time that it approves the foreign bankruptcy procedures or after approving the foreign bankruptcy procedures by its inherent jurisdiction or upon receiving an application filed by interested persons. This Paper introduces international insolvency law regime, especially foreign cases with domestic aspects under the Korean Act, DRBAK, in detail. Secondly, by comparing U.S. Bankruptcy Code Chapter 15 and Japanese Law of Recognition and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Proceedings under Korean legal system, the Paper proposes that international suitability and global fitness in international insolvency regime in Korea.
Abstract
In Korea, from 2006, the new era of bankruptcy law governing international insolvency began. The previous three bankruptcy laws -Bankruptcy Act, Composition Act, and Corporate Reorganization Act -have been merged into, and were replaced by, the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act of Korea. One of the most important changes on the Act (DRBAK) is the introduction of “universalism” of an international insolvency part. Although Korea established new universalism system with respect to international insolvency problems, the research and the study of effects and values of new system is still necessary. Under the DRBAK, in cases where the debtor has his/her place of business, his/her office or his/her domicile in a nation in which an application is filed for foreign bankruptcy procedures, the representative of such foreign bankruptcy procedures may file an application accompanied by a written statements falling under each of the Article 631 (1) with the court for approving the foreign bankruptcy procedures. Upon receiving an application filed for approving foreign bankruptcy procedures, the court shall decide whether to approve them on which such application is filed. In cases falling under any of the following, the court shall dismiss an application filed for approving foreign bankruptcy procedures: ① Where expenses determined by the court are not prepaid; ② Where each written statement provided for in each subparagraphs of Article 631 (1) is not submitted or the establishment and contents of any such written statement is not bona fide; and ③ Where approving the foreign bankruptcy procedures is contrary to the good public morals and social order of the Republic of Korea. The court may make a decision falling under any of the Article 636 (1) in order to protect the debtor s business and assets or the creditors profits at the time that it approves the foreign bankruptcy procedures or after approving the foreign bankruptcy procedures by its inherent jurisdiction or upon receiving an application filed by interested persons. This Paper introduces international insolvency law regime, especially foreign cases with domestic aspects under the Korean Act, DRBAK, in detail. Secondly, by comparing U.S. Bankruptcy Code Chapter 15 and Japanese Law of Recognition and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Proceedings under Korean legal system, the Paper proposes that international suitability and global fitness in international insolvency regime in Korea.
참고문헌 (78)
- 최준선, "국제거래법, 제6판" (2009), 삼영사
- 임치용, "파산법연구" (2004), 박영사
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "Multinational Enterprise in General Default: Chapter 15, The ALI Principles, and The EU Insolvency Regulations", Am. Bankr. L.J., 76, pp.1~ (2002)
- International Insolvency, "Samuel L. Bufford", Federal Judicial Center, 2~ (2001)
- 석광현, "채무자회생 및 파산에 관한 법률(이른바 통합도산법)에 따른 국제도산법", 국제거래법연구, 15(2), pp.319~384 (2006), 국제거래법학회
- 박준, "국제적 회사정리를 둘러싼 제문제", 민사판례연구, 16, pp.590~ (1994), 민사판례연구회
- Lynn M. LoPucki, "Cooperation in International Bankruptcy: A Post-Universalist Approach", 84 Cornell L. Rev. 696, pp.701~ (1999)
- Hans Van Houtte, "The Law of International Trade, 2th ed.", pp.374~ (2002), Sweet & Maxwell
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "Theory and Pragmatism in Global Insolvencies: Choice of Law and Choice of Forum", 65 Am. Bankr. L.J. 457, pp.458~ (1991)
- Rasmussen, "A New Approach To Transnational Insolvencies", 19 Mich. J. Int'l L. 1, pp.16~17 (1997)
- Lawrence Westbrook, "Universal Priorities", 33 Tex. Int'l L.J. 27, pp.28~ (1998)
- Liza Perkins, "A Defense of Pure Universalism in Cross-Border Corporate Insolvencies", N.Y.U. J. Int'l & Pol., 32, pp.787~ (2000)
- Donald T. Trautman, "Jay Lawrence Westbrook & Emmanuel Gaillard, Four Models for International Bankruptcy", 41 Am. J. Comp. L. 573, pp.575~ (1993)
- Melissa K. S. Alwang, "Steering the Most Appropriate Course Between Admiralty and Insolvency: Why an International Insolvency Treaty Should Recognize the Primacy of Admiralty Law over Maritime Assets", 64 Fordham L. Rev. 2613, pp.2642~ (1996)
- Ulrich Drobnig, "Secured Credit in International Insolvency Proceedings", 33 Tex. Int'l L.J. 53, pp.66~ (1998)
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송, 제3권" (2004), 박영사
- Jenny Clift, "The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency: A Legislative Framework to Facilitate Coordination and Cooperation in Cross-Border Insolvency", Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 12, pp.307~ (2004)
- 석광현, "유럽연합의 국제도산법제", 국제사법연구, 7(2) (2002), 한국국제사법학회
- Manfred Balz, "The European Union Convention on Insolvency Proceedings", 70 Am. Bankr. L.J. 485 (1996)
- Todd Kraft, "Transnational Bankruptcies: Section 304 and Beyond", 1993 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 329, pp.330~ (1993)
- 林 治 龍, "미국 파산법원이 본 한국의 회사정리절차", 저스티스, (82), pp.222~260 (2004), 한국법학원
- Douglass G. Boshkoff, "United States Judicial Assistance in Cross-Border Insolvencies", 36 Int'l & Comp. L.Q. 729 (1987)
- Stacy Allen Morales, "Bankruptcy Code Section 304 and U.S. Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcies: The Tyranny of Comity", 39 Bus. Law. 1573 (1984)
- Charles Booth, "Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcies: An Analysis and Critique of the Inconsistent Approaches of United States Courts", 66 Am. Bank. L.J. 135, pp.137~ (1992)
- Daniel M. Glosband, "Claims and Priorities in Ancillary Proceedings Under Section 304", 17 Brook. J. of Int'l L. 477, pp.480~ (1991)
- André J. Berends, "The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency: A Comprehensive Overview", 6 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 309, pp.314~ (1998)
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "Choice of Avoidance Law in Global Insolvencies", 17 Brook. J. Int'l L. 499, pp.515~ (1991)
- Mary Elaine Knecht, "Comment, The Drapery of Illusion of Section 304 - What Lurks Beneath: Territoriality in the Judicial Application of Section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code", 13 U. Pa. J. Int'l Bus. L. 287, pp.299~ (1992)
- Benjamin J. Christenson, "Best Let Sleeping Presumptions Lie: Interpretation of 'Center of Main Interest' Under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and an Appeal for Additional Judicial Complacency", U. Ill. L. Rev., 2010, pp.1565~ (2010)
- Alesia Ranney-Marinelli, "Overview of Chapter 15 Ancillary and Other Cross-Border Cases", Am. Bankr. L.J., 82, pp.269~ (2008)
- Elizabeth J. Gerber, "Not All Politics is Local: The New Chapter 15 to Govern Cross-Border Insolvencies", Fordham L. Rev., 71, pp.2051~ (2003)
- John J. Chung, "The New Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code: A Step Toward Erosion of National Sovereignty", Nw. J. Int’l. L. & Bus., 27, pp.89~ (2007)
- 석광현, "통합도산법"
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "Locating the Eye of the Financial Storm", Brook. J. Int'l L., 32, pp.1019~ (2007)
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "A Global Solution to Multinational Default", Mich. L. Rev., 98, pp.2276~ (2000)
- John C. Chung, "Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and its Implicit Assumptions Regarding the Foreign Exchange Market", Tenn. L. Rev., 76, pp.67~ (2006)
- Samuel L. Bufford, "International Insolvency Case Venue in the European Union: The Parmalat and Daisytek Controversies", Colum. J. Eur. L., 12, pp.429~ (2006)
- Miguel Virgos, "Report on the Convention on Insolvency Proceedings", The EC Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings: A Commentary and Annotated Guide, pp.263~327 (2002), Oxford Univ. Press
- Samuel L. Bufford, "Center of Main Interests, International Insolvency Case Venue, and Equality of Arms: The Eurofood Decision of the European Court of Justice", Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus., 27, pp.351~ (2007)
- Laura Shidlovitsky, "Adoption of Chapter 15: A Necessary Step in International Bankruptcy Reform", Sw. J.L. & Trade Am., 10, pp.171~ (2004)
- 임치용, "파산법연구3" (2010), 박영사
- Charles Jordan Tabb, "The Law of Bankruptcy, 2d ed." (2009), Foundation Press
- Look Chan Ho, "Recognising an Australian Solvent Liquidation under the UNCITRAL Model Law: In re Betcorp", J. Bankr. L. & Prac., 18, pp.537~538 (2009)
- Look Chan Ho, "Smoothing Cross-Border Insolvency By Synchronizing The UNCITRAL Model Law: In re Samsun Logix Corporation", Butterworths J. Int’l Banking and Fin. L., 24, pp.395~ (2009)
- 深山卓也, "国際倒産法の整備に関する法律の槪要", ジュリスト, (1194), pp.41~ (2001), 有斐閣
- 貝瀬幸雄, "国際倒産法序説", pp.34~38 (1989), 東京大学出版会
- 深山卓也, "民事再生法制定の經過と法の槪要", ジュリスト, (1171), pp.6~7 (2000), 有斐閣
- 深山卓也, "新しい国際倒産法制", pp.2~27 (2001), 金融財政事情研究会
- 山本和彦, "国際倒産法制", pp.10~ (2002), 商事法務
- 深山卓也, "外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律及び民事再生法等の一部を改正する法律(国際倒産関係規定)の概要", 国際商事法務, 29(1)통권 : 463 (2001), 国際商事法研究所
- 竹內康二, "外國倒産節次의 承認", 국제사법연구, (7), pp.262~ (2002), 한국국제사법학회
- 山本和彦, "新たな国際倒産法制(1)-UNCITRALモデル法と比較を中心に-", NBL, (698) (2000), 商事法務硏究会
- 山本和彦, "外国倒産処理手続の承認援助法について(1)", ジュリスト, (1194), pp.57~ (2001), 有斐閣
- 高木新二郎, "倒産法の改正と運用", pp.197~ (2000), 商事法務研究会
- 山本和彦, "承認援助法"
- 貝瀬幸雄, "国際倒産法と比較法", pp.167~ (2003), 有斐閣
- 深山, "前揭論文"
- 山本克己, "外国倒産処理手続の承認援助法について(2)", ジュリスト, (1194), pp.65~ (2001), 有斐閣
- 竹内康二, "国際倒産法の構築と展望", pp.43~52 (1994), 成文堂
- 坂井秀行, "日米にまたがる麻布建物㈱にみる-承認援助手続と国際並行倒産", 事業再生と債権管理, (127), pp.67~102 (2010), 金融財政事情研究会
- 김형두, "한국국제도산법의 발전방향", 국제거래법연구, 10 (2001), 국제거래법학회
- 박승두, "통합도산법 분석, in 법률SOS", pp.231~ (2005)
- 박훤일, "국제거래법", pp.452~ (1995), 한국경영법무연구소
- 석광현, "국제도산법의 몇 가지 문제점", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 241, pp.49~65 (1996), 대한변호사협회
- 손종학, "국제도산에 관한 규정의 입법방안에 관한 연구", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 286 (2000), 대한변호사협회
- 임채웅, "외국도산절차가 국내에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 재판자료, 82, pp.52~ (1999), 법원도서관
- 林 治 龍, "외국파산절차가 국내에 미치는 영향", 저스티스, (79), pp.173~199 (2004), 한국법학원
- 전병서, "파산법", pp.381~ (2003), 법문사
- 한충수, "외국도산절차의 승인과 집행", 국제사법연구, 6, pp.12~ (2001), 한국국제사법학회
- 석광현, "도산절차의 국제사법, in 도산법강의" (2005), 법문사
- 임채홍, "회사정리법(상)", pp.124~ (1999), 한국사법행정학회
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법, 제5판", pp.558~ (2010), 박영사
- 박훤일, "국제도산절차와 포럼 쇼핑 문제", 국제거래법연구, 16(1), pp.267~289 (2007), 국제거래법학회
- 한충수, "UNCITRAL의 국제도산절차 Model Law 연구 -외국도산절차의 승인 및 집행을 중심으로", 민사소송, 7(2), pp.526~568 (2003), 한국민사소송법학회
- 권택수, "파산법 제3조 제2항 소정의 외국에서 선고한 파산은 한국 내에 있는 재산에 대하여는 그 효력이 없다는 규정의 의미", 대법원판례해설, (45), pp.490~513 (2003), 법원도서관
- 석광현, "미국 파산법원의 재판의 효력과 파산법의 속지주의", 판례연구, 18, pp.201~232 (2004), 서울지방변호사회
- 석광현, "채무자회생 및 파산에 관한 법률안 중 국제도산에 대한 의견", 법률신문 제3305호, ~ (2004)
- 김소영, "세계적 기업파산은 국경 넘어까지 파급 - 공동인식", 인터넷법률신문, ~ (2009)