The Reason why Ku 'he' cannot be A'-dependent: An Agree-based Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide an agree-based analysis of why the Korean singular pronoun ku 'he' is not interpreted as a variable bound by every-type quantifiers. This paper has attempted to show how the anti-variable binding of the so-called overt pronoun ku 'he' is accounted for within the conception of the agree-based approach without recourse to Binding Condition B. The fact that the Korean singular pronoun ku 'he' is not licensed by every-type quantifiers need not to be stipulated. It simply follows from the fact that if the overt pronoun ku 'he' which is singular does not agree in number with its antecedent, it cannot get its reference (R-feature) from its antecedent. With respect to the treatment of binding within the agree-based approach, one major point that is worth emphasizing is that the anti-variable binding of ku 'he' falls on our Reference Agreement Principle based on agree which requires the singular pronoun ku 'he' to be linked to its singular antecedent. More specifically, it is hypothesized in this paper that ku 'he' cannot be interpreted as a bound variable due to the number disagreement between every-type quantifiers and the singular dependent term ku 'he'. This hypothesis rests on the assumption that since every-type quantifiers in Korean involve a group of people, it is semantically plural, but ku 'he' is a singular NP whose referent must consist of a single entity. Finally, this paper provides several pieces of empirical evidence which entertains the hypothesis that the overt pronoun ku 'he' which is singular must agree in number with its antecedent.
Abstract
The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide an agree-based analysis of why the Korean singular pronoun ku 'he' is not interpreted as a variable bound by every-type quantifiers. This paper has attempted to show how the anti-variable binding of the so-called overt pronoun ku 'he' is accounted for within the conception of the agree-based approach without recourse to Binding Condition B. The fact that the Korean singular pronoun ku 'he' is not licensed by every-type quantifiers need not to be stipulated. It simply follows from the fact that if the overt pronoun ku 'he' which is singular does not agree in number with its antecedent, it cannot get its reference (R-feature) from its antecedent. With respect to the treatment of binding within the agree-based approach, one major point that is worth emphasizing is that the anti-variable binding of ku 'he' falls on our Reference Agreement Principle based on agree which requires the singular pronoun ku 'he' to be linked to its singular antecedent. More specifically, it is hypothesized in this paper that ku 'he' cannot be interpreted as a bound variable due to the number disagreement between every-type quantifiers and the singular dependent term ku 'he'. This hypothesis rests on the assumption that since every-type quantifiers in Korean involve a group of people, it is semantically plural, but ku 'he' is a singular NP whose referent must consist of a single entity. Finally, this paper provides several pieces of empirical evidence which entertains the hypothesis that the overt pronoun ku 'he' which is singular must agree in number with its antecedent.
참고문헌 (19)
- Behavior of Japanese Anaphoric Expressions in Sloppy Identity: Karera 'they' and Zibun 'self', "Aikawa, T.", MIT, 1~16, pp.MIT Working papers 14 (1991)
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N. Barriers, "Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by Phrase, In Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Heinat, F., "Probes, Pronouns and Binding in the Minimalist Program", 박사, pp.2008
- Hicks, G., "Derivation of Anaphoric Relations. Linguistik Aktuell" (2009), John Benjamins
- Higginbotham, J., "Anaphoric Reference and Common Reference", 석사, pp.1992
- Hoji, H., "Kare, In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda", pp.287~304 (1991)
- Hoji, H., "Demonstrative Binding and Principle B", NELS, 25, pp.255~271 (1995)
- Hoji, H., "Sloppy Identity and Formal Dependency", WCCFL, 15, pp.209~223 (1997)
- Hornstein, N., "Logic as Grammar" (1986), MIT Press
- Hornstein, N., "Bound and Referential Pronouns. Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure" (1991)
- 강남길, "He and Kutul", 영어영문학연구, 38(2), pp.151~170 (2012), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Katada, F., "The LF Representation of Anaphors", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.87~313 (1991)
- Lasnik, H., "Essays on Anaphora" (1989), Kluwer
- Richards, N., "Toward a Theory of Head-binding", 석사, pp.1995
- Richards, N., "Competition and Disjoint Reference", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.178~187 (1997)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Weak crossover and Move α in Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, pp.245~259 (1983)