본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

특허권침해소송과 재심청구의 제한 − 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로 −

Patent Infringement Litigation and Limits on the Retrial

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The patent validity may be considered in the civil court and the patent court at the same time in Korea and Japan patent law system. It is called 󰡐double track system.󰡑But the most difficult problem in the double track system is discrepancy between the two courts. The retrial in the field of patent infringement litigation may solve the discrepancy. On the other hand, the retrial may disturb the litigants' legal position, especially plaintiff's position and may delay legal proceedings. So Japanese 2013 revised patent law placed new regulations regarding limits on the retrial. The regulations need to be considered in korea patent law but it is too early to accept the regulations immediately because of difference in korea and Japan legal systems. I hope that a study on the retrial in the field of patent infringement litigation goes on in the future.

Abstract

The patent validity may be considered in the civil court and the patent court at the same time in Korea and Japan patent law system. It is called 󰡐double track system.󰡑But the most difficult problem in the double track system is discrepancy between the two courts. The retrial in the field of patent infringement litigation may solve the discrepancy. On the other hand, the retrial may disturb the litigants' legal position, especially plaintiff's position and may delay legal proceedings. So Japanese 2013 revised patent law placed new regulations regarding limits on the retrial. The regulations need to be considered in korea patent law but it is too early to accept the regulations immediately because of difference in korea and Japan legal systems. I hope that a study on the retrial in the field of patent infringement litigation goes on in the future.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 정상조, "특허법 주해 II" (2010), 박영사
  2. 조영선, "특허법(제3판)" (2011), 도서출판 박영사
  3. 강흠정, "특허침해소송의 재심에 대한 연구", 지식재산연구, 6(3), pp.1~36 (2011), 한국지식재산연구원
  4. 吉藤幸朔, "特許法槪說" (2005), 대광서림
  5. "“特許法改正と特許の有效性をめく“る審理の在り方,” 特許研究 PATENT STUDIES No.52(2011/9)"[URL]
  6. 渡忍森児, "特許權侵害訴訟における再審主張制限とその射程-平成23年改正による特許法第104條の4の創設を契機として-", 近畿大学 法科大学院論集, (9) (2013)
  7. 渡忍森児, "特許權侵害訴訟における再審の訴えの許容性-特許爭訟のタフ”ルトラツク現象の問題解決ヘ向けて-", 信州大学 法学論集, (15) (2010)
  8. 竹中俊子, "知的財産法の新しぃ 流れ(片山英二先生還曆記念論文集)" (2010), 靑林書院
  9. "“侵害訴訟の判決確定後の無效審判等による再審の取扱い,”「特許制度に関する法制的な課題について」(平成23年2月)"[URL]
  10. "「平成23年 特許法等の一部改正 産業財産権法の解説」(發明協會, 2012.1.)" (2012)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)