空間構造를 통해 본 新羅의 五小京과 渤海의 五京
Silla’s Five Vice-Capitals and Balhae’s Five Capitals As Seen through Their Spatial Structures
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Till now, lots of findings have been produced by the studies of Silla’s 5 vice-capitals and Balhae’s 5 capitals, which still seem to have so many limitations that they have not yet determined even the locations of some capitals. Nevertheless, considerably various facts have been found whether though land registration maps or through earth surface or excavation surveys of each capital. Accordingly, it is necessary to review the capitals comprehensively on the basis of such data. It seems that one of such combined projects is the very restoration of the capitals’spatial structures. Specifically, each Silla’s capital may have had a structure similar to North Wei-style capital structure or have had a whole structure which encompassed another area’s structure somewhere in a capital’s zone, according to a viewpoint on the location of government site. Or the capital may have a spatial structure separated and completely different from that of each administrative zone. Accordingly, an accurate understanding indispensably requires making a full-scale excavation survey of an area that is considered as a place with its government offices. This is because the mere land registration map or topographic map makes it impossible to get any answer. On the contrary, it seems unreasonable to see West and East Capitals in Balhae merely as Fortress Seogo and Fortress Pallyeon. Judging from its scope or structure, Fortress Seogo or Fortress Pallyeon should be regarded as a form of government site. This means that it is necessary to search for the remains associated with a capital in its neighborhood, considering a view that there may be another outer fortress outside a fortress. This indicates that it is necessary to make an additional survey of neighboring areas in the future. In addition, it seems necessary to make a full-scale examination of the differences in class between Metropolis Sanggyeong’s palace zone and other capitals in terms of structure and scope, though 5 capitals were referred to. As far as a comparative study of Silla’s five vice-capitals and Balhae’s five capitals is concerned, it will not be impossible to fully examine them until the problems mentioned above are solved.
Abstract
Till now, lots of findings have been produced by the studies of Silla’s 5 vice-capitals and Balhae’s 5 capitals, which still seem to have so many limitations that they have not yet determined even the locations of some capitals. Nevertheless, considerably various facts have been found whether though land registration maps or through earth surface or excavation surveys of each capital. Accordingly, it is necessary to review the capitals comprehensively on the basis of such data. It seems that one of such combined projects is the very restoration of the capitals’spatial structures. Specifically, each Silla’s capital may have had a structure similar to North Wei-style capital structure or have had a whole structure which encompassed another area’s structure somewhere in a capital’s zone, according to a viewpoint on the location of government site. Or the capital may have a spatial structure separated and completely different from that of each administrative zone. Accordingly, an accurate understanding indispensably requires making a full-scale excavation survey of an area that is considered as a place with its government offices. This is because the mere land registration map or topographic map makes it impossible to get any answer. On the contrary, it seems unreasonable to see West and East Capitals in Balhae merely as Fortress Seogo and Fortress Pallyeon. Judging from its scope or structure, Fortress Seogo or Fortress Pallyeon should be regarded as a form of government site. This means that it is necessary to search for the remains associated with a capital in its neighborhood, considering a view that there may be another outer fortress outside a fortress. This indicates that it is necessary to make an additional survey of neighboring areas in the future. In addition, it seems necessary to make a full-scale examination of the differences in class between Metropolis Sanggyeong’s palace zone and other capitals in terms of structure and scope, though 5 capitals were referred to. As far as a comparative study of Silla’s five vice-capitals and Balhae’s five capitals is concerned, it will not be impossible to fully examine them until the problems mentioned above are solved.
참고문헌 (79)
- 李基白, "韓國史講座" (1982), 古代篇
- 梁起錫, "新羅 5小京의 設置와 西原小京 in: 新羅西原小京硏究" (2001), 서경문화사
- 田中俊明, "新羅五小京の成立と國原小京 in: 古代の日本と渡來の文化" (1997), 學生社
- 林起煥, "高句麗의 副都 漢城과 地方統治 in: 韓國古代中世地方制度의 諸問題" (2004)
- 張國鍾, "渤海の領域と五京制 in: 高句麗·渤海と古代日本" (1993), 雄山閣
- 宋基豪, "渤海 5京制의 淵源과 役割", 講座 韓國古代史, 7 (2002)
- 韓圭哲, "渤海의 西京鴨淥府 硏究", 韓國古代史硏究, 14 (1998)
- 김기섭김진광, "발해의 상경 건설과 천도", 한국고대사연구, 45(45), pp.189~220 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 藤田亮策, "新羅九州五京考", 朝鮮學報, 5 (1953)
- 李丙燾, "韓國史-古代篇-", pp.442~ (1959), 乙酉文化社
- 林炳泰, "新羅小京考", 歷史學報, 35, pp.95~96 (1967)
- 千寬宇, "三韓의 國家形成", 韓國學報, 3, pp.146~ (1976)
- 統一新羅九州五小京- 그 都市構造에 대하여, "山田隆文", 國立文化財硏究所, ~ (2007)
- 山田隆文, "新羅の九州五小京城郭の構造と實態について- 統一新羅による計劃都市の復元硏究", 考古學論攷, 31 (2008)
- 李在俊, "沙啄部銘平瓦에 對한 小考", 西原學報, 2 (1981)
- 李元根, "三國時代 城郭硏究", 박사, pp.1981
- 張俊植, "高句麗 國原城治址에 關한 硏究", 석사, pp.1982
- 朴泰祐, "統一新羅時代의 地方都市에 對한 硏究", 百濟硏究, 18 (1987), 忠南大學校 百濟硏究所
- 梁起錫, "新羅의 淸州地域進出", 文化史學, 11, pp.375~ (1999)
- "三國史記 卷36 地理3", ~
- 淸州市歷史遺蹟, "忠北大學校 湖西文化硏究所", 25~ (1983)
- 梁起錫, "新羅西原京城의 位置와 運用", 忠北史學, 11, pp.132~ (2000)
- 梁起錫, "新羅 五小京의 設置와 西原京", 湖西文化硏究, 11, pp.26~30 (1993)
- 車勇杰, "西原京의 位置와 構造", 湖西文化硏究, 11, pp.37~53 (1993)
- 韓國의 城郭과 烽燧(上), "李元根", ~
- 車勇杰, "國原小京의 遺物遺蹟 in: 中原京과 中央塔", pp.104~105 (1992)
- 張俊植, "新羅中原京硏究", pp.104~108 (1998)
- 閔德植, "鎭川 大母山城의 分析的 考察", 韓國史硏究, 29, pp.2~ (1980)
- 金侖禹, "娘臂城과 娘子谷城考", 史學志, 21, pp.275~ (1988)
- 李仁在, "羅末麗初 北原京의 政治勢力 再編과 佛敎界의 動向", 韓國古代史硏究, 31 (2003), 韓國古代史學會
- 李在桓, "고고학자료를 통해 본 統一新羅時代 北原京 硏究", 석사, pp.2007
- 井上秀雄, "朝鮮城郭一覽", 朝鮮學報, 107, pp.164~165 (1983)
- 原州 鴒原山城`海美山城 地表調査報告書, "車勇杰", 23~24 (1998)
- 梁正錫, "宮闕遺蹟을 통해 본 渤海의 都城 in: 渤海의 5京과 領域 變遷" (2007)
- 韓圭哲, "渤海 5京의 性格과 技能 in: 渤海의 5京과 領域 變遷" (2007)
- 駒井和愛, "渤海の舊國·顯州·中京顯德府について in: 中國都城·渤海硏究" (1977), 雄山閣
- 方學鳳, "渤海從舊國中京東京爲王都時期的敎育試探", 延邊歷史硏究, 86(1) (1986)
- 單慶麟, "渤海舊京城址調査", 文物, 60(6) (1960)
- "高句麗 渤海硏究集成 5(渤海二)" (1997), 哈爾濱出版社
- 朱英憲, "渤海文化" (1971), 社會科學出版社
- 中國의 渤海 都城 硏究와 復原 in: 中國의 韓國古代文化硏究 分析, "林相先", ~ (2005)
- 吉林大學 邊疆考古硏究中心, "吉林 敦化市 敖東城遺址 發掘簡報", 考古, 06(9) (2006)
- 張博泉, "제7장 渤海考古 in: 東北古代民族·考古与彊域", pp.398~ (1998), 吉林大學出版社
- 朱英憲, "渤海中京顯德府에 대하여", 考古民俗, 66(2) (1966)
- 林相先, "渤海의 遷都에 대한 考察", 淸溪史學, 5 (1988)
- 宋基豪, "渤海 城址의 調査와 硏究", 韓國史論, 19 (1989)
- 方學鳳, "발해의 중경에 관한 몇 가지 문제 in: 韓國史學論叢 上" (1992), 水邨朴永錫敎授華甲紀念論叢刊行委員會
- 秋山進午, "渤海“塔基”壁畵墓の發見と硏究", 大境, 10 (1986)
- 田村晃一, "渤海の瓦當文樣に關する若干の考察", 靑山史學, 19 (2001)
- 田村晃一, "渤海瓦當論再考", 早稻田大學大學院文學硏究科紀要, 47 (2002)
- 酒寄雅志, "渤海の王都と領域支配", 古代文化, 50(9) (1998)
- 酒寄雅志, "渤海と古代の日本", pp.141~ (2001), 校倉書房
- 國家文物局, "吉林和龍西古城城址 in: 2001中國重要考古發現" (2002), 文物出版社
- 宋玉彬, "延邊和龍西古城城址發掘廓淸歷史懸案 in: 中國文物報" (2003), 吉林省文物考古硏究所
- 『西古城』-渤海國中京考古發掘報告-, "延邊自治州文化局", ~ (2007)
- 鄭永振, "和龍縣龍海古迹調査", 黑龍江文物叢刊, 1983(2) (1983)
- 李南奭, "遺蹟으로 본 繼承關係 in: 발해의 계승관계" (2005)
- 東亞考古學會, "東京城" (1939), 東亞考古學會
- 東亞考古學會, "中國 東北 地方의 遺蹟 발굴 보고 1963-1965" (1966), 사회과학원출판사
- 中國社會科學院考古硏究所, "六頂山與渤海鎭―唐代渤海國的貴族墓地與都城遺址― in: 中國田野考古學報告集 考古學專刊 丁種 56號" (1997), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 채태형, "渤海東京龍原府─琿春八連城說 再檢討", 歷史科學, 90(3) (1990)
- "新唐書 卷219, 北狄, 渤海傳", ~
- 송기호, "발해의 천도와 그 배경", 한국고대사연구, 36, pp.113~138 (2004), 한국고대사학회
- "渤海의 西京鴨淥府 硏究", 韓國古代史硏究, 14, pp.360~373 (2007)
- 朴時亨, "渤海史", 理論과 實踐
- 社會科學院 歷史硏究所, "朝鮮全史" (1991), 科學百科辭典綜合出版社
- 吉林省文物志編纂委員會, "渾江市文物志", ~
- 張殿甲, "琿江地區渤海遺迹與遺物", 博物館硏究 (1988)
- 채태형, "渤海南京南海府의 位置에 대하여", 歷史科學, 91(3) (1991)
- "我邦彊域考", ~
- 和田淸, "渤海國地理考", 東洋學報, 36(4) (1954)
- "東亞史硏究(滿洲篇)" (1955), 東洋文庫
- 李京贊, "古代 韓國 地方都市 格子形 土地區劃의 形態特性에 關한 硏究", 建築歷史硏究, 11(4) (2002)
- 車勇杰, "西原小京의 位置와 構造 in: 新羅西原小京硏究", pp.213~214 (2001)
- 李秉建, "渤海 建築遺蹟 現況 및 渤海建築 硏究動向 in: 海建築의 理解" (2005)
- 齊藤兵甚衛, "琿春 in: 琿春·敦化", pp.15~18 (1943)
- 齊藤兵甚衛, "滿洲國間島省琿春半拉城に就いて", 考古學雜誌, 32(5), pp.234~235 (1942)
- 王俠, "琿春的渤海遺跡與日本道", 學習與探索, 1982(4) (1982)
- 李健才, "琿春渤海古城考", 學習與探索 (1985)