본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

渤海 宮闕構造의 系譜에 대한 檢討 - 上京城과 西古城의 宮殿址을 중심으로 -

An Examination on the Genealogy of Royal Palaces in Balhae - Centering on the Royal Palace Sites of Sanggyeongseong Castle and Seogoseong Castle -

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The publication of the reports on Sanggyeongseong Castle[上京城] and Seogo Castle[西古城] contributed to enhancing the level of studying a step higher on the basis of existing excavation fruits in Old Japan times. Especially, a lot of points of view presented in the reports will be a milestone to understanding the traits of Balhae[渤海] royal palaces. But the recognition revealed here on Balhae royal castles, especially on the genealogy of palaces, have to be examined, compared with the existing studies. It is because discusses on reports were based on the results of the investigation about excavation, but it’s not far from the existing recognition, at the point of view after examination. They said that the structure of Sanggyeongseong Castle found now is the latest shape, but the structure of the past was the same as that of Seogoseong Castle. From an aspect it seems to be reasonable. But, basically that opinion is set out that the palace1 and palace2 of Sanggyeongseong Castle can not be built without the affection of Tang[唐]. This thesis and the another one written by myself found out that there were more parts that could be compared with the arrangement and structure of Goguryeo[高句麗] Palaces than the parts that could be compared with the arrangement of Tang directly. This thesis could establish a direct genealogy from a central palace building division. That report intended to restore the expansion courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle through the recognition on soil layer sections of Sanggyeongseong Castle No.3 palace site. But, compared with restoration height of Seogoseong Palace No.1, object of comparison, it has something to considered on. In addition, the control works for setting main sticks and foundations on the upper parts in the course of piling up soils and stones are found from the other archaeological sites such as miruk temple site of Baekje. So, it is necessary to think of the issue in the other aspects. In the end, referring to the palace sites of Sanggyeongseong Palace No.4 and the palace sites of Seogoseong Palace No.2, this thesis looked into the fact that there were a lot of parts to think of due to something more than only the king’s bedroom[寢殿]. It is because an Assembly hall[講堂] sites of Neungsanri[陵山里] temple Sites[寺址] at Baekje[百濟] periods are found, similar to the structure of the building sites of the palace sites. Now, a lot of discussions are on the progress, in relation to Neungsanrisa Site halls. So, the roles of Sanggyeongseong Castle and Seogoseong Castle have to be discussed on again. It has to be considered on, together with the structure arrangements of vice-palace and structure and palace sites in the right and left . This thesis presented the points of view, different from those of the reports, about some parts. There are some possibilities for developed new culture of Tang to be mixed and imported to the building courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle, as time went by . But, it has to be considered on that a lot of parts that Goguryeo’s culture had are found in Sanggyeongseong Castle. It is because the facts are important hints for understanding position and genealogy that Balhae palace has, viewed from the East Asia Castle styles.

Abstract

The publication of the reports on Sanggyeongseong Castle[上京城] and Seogo Castle[西古城] contributed to enhancing the level of studying a step higher on the basis of existing excavation fruits in Old Japan times. Especially, a lot of points of view presented in the reports will be a milestone to understanding the traits of Balhae[渤海] royal palaces. But the recognition revealed here on Balhae royal castles, especially on the genealogy of palaces, have to be examined, compared with the existing studies. It is because discusses on reports were based on the results of the investigation about excavation, but it’s not far from the existing recognition, at the point of view after examination. They said that the structure of Sanggyeongseong Castle found now is the latest shape, but the structure of the past was the same as that of Seogoseong Castle. From an aspect it seems to be reasonable. But, basically that opinion is set out that the palace1 and palace2 of Sanggyeongseong Castle can not be built without the affection of Tang[唐]. This thesis and the another one written by myself found out that there were more parts that could be compared with the arrangement and structure of Goguryeo[高句麗] Palaces than the parts that could be compared with the arrangement of Tang directly. This thesis could establish a direct genealogy from a central palace building division. That report intended to restore the expansion courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle through the recognition on soil layer sections of Sanggyeongseong Castle No.3 palace site. But, compared with restoration height of Seogoseong Palace No.1, object of comparison, it has something to considered on. In addition, the control works for setting main sticks and foundations on the upper parts in the course of piling up soils and stones are found from the other archaeological sites such as miruk temple site of Baekje. So, it is necessary to think of the issue in the other aspects. In the end, referring to the palace sites of Sanggyeongseong Palace No.4 and the palace sites of Seogoseong Palace No.2, this thesis looked into the fact that there were a lot of parts to think of due to something more than only the king’s bedroom[寢殿]. It is because an Assembly hall[講堂] sites of Neungsanri[陵山里] temple Sites[寺址] at Baekje[百濟] periods are found, similar to the structure of the building sites of the palace sites. Now, a lot of discussions are on the progress, in relation to Neungsanrisa Site halls. So, the roles of Sanggyeongseong Castle and Seogoseong Castle have to be discussed on again. It has to be considered on, together with the structure arrangements of vice-palace and structure and palace sites in the right and left . This thesis presented the points of view, different from those of the reports, about some parts. There are some possibilities for developed new culture of Tang to be mixed and imported to the building courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle, as time went by . But, it has to be considered on that a lot of parts that Goguryeo’s culture had are found in Sanggyeongseong Castle. It is because the facts are important hints for understanding position and genealogy that Balhae palace has, viewed from the East Asia Castle styles.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 黑龍江省文物考古硏究所, "1998~2007年度考古發掘調査報告", 文物出版社, ~ (2009)
  2. "- 渤海國上京龍泉府址の發掘調査-" (1939), 東亞考古學會
  3. 鳥山喜一, "藤田亮策", 間島省古迹調査報告 (1942)
  4. 鳥山喜一, "渤海中京考", 考古學雜誌, 34(1) (1944), 日本考古學會
  5. 전인학, "서고성 발굴과 궁전 건축에 관하여-발해국 중경현덕부 옛터-」", 동북아역사재단 국제학술회의, pp.87~114 (2008), 渤海와 東아시아
  6. 고구려발해학회, "중경시기 발해의 역사와 문화 재발견", 학술회의 (2009)
  7. 이종수, "渤海西古城發掘現況과 그 意義", 고구려발해연구, 34(34), pp.211~245 (2009), 고구려발해학회
  8. 이병건, "화전 소밀성과 화룡 서고성의 건축형식 비교연구", 고구려발해연구, 34(34), pp.247~274 (2009), 고구려발해학회
  9. 김희찬, "발해 연화문 와당의 고구려 계승성 검토", 고구려발해연구, 36(36), pp.201~230 (2010), 고구려발해학회
  10. 劉曉東, "渤海上京城主體格局的演變", 北方文物, 91(1) (1991)
  11. 김종복, "발해정치외교사", pp.231~253 (2009), 일지사
  12. 양정석, "宮闕遺蹟을 통해 본 渤海의 都城`in발해5경과 영역변천", 동북아역사재단, ~ (2007)
  13. 전제헌, "안학궁유적에 대한 연구", pp.102~ (1985), 고구려력사연구
  14. 김봉건, "궁궐" (2002), 北韓文化財解說集
  15. 孫進己, "渤海的建築", 高句麗·渤海硏究集成, 6, pp.77~78 (1997), 哈爾濱出版社
  16. 方學鳳, "발해의 상경성과 당나라의 장안성에 대한 비교 연구", pp.243~ (2000), 渤海史의 綜合的 考察
  17. 李殿福, "渤海上京永興殿考", pp.1989~1994 (1989), 北方文物
  18. "東北考古硏究", pp.425~, 中州古籍出版社
  19. 魏存成, "渤海都城的布局發展及其與隋唐長安城的關係", 邊疆考古硏究, 2 (2004), 科學出版社
  20. 朱國忱, "渤海故都" (1996), 黑龍江人民出版社
  21. 張鐵寧, "渤海上京龍泉府宮殿建築復原", pp.94~96 (1994), 文物
  22. 양정석, "皇龍寺의 造營과 王權", pp.136~138 (2004)
  23. 黑龍江省文物考古硏究所, "渤海國上京龍泉府宮城第二宮殿遺址發掘簡報", pp.2000~2011 (2000), 文物
  24. "대성산의 고구려유적" (1973), 김일성종합대학출판사
  25. 양정석, "彌勒寺址 塔址의 調査過程에 대한 檢討", 韓國史學報, (36), pp.357~395 (2009), 고려사학회
  26. 鳥山喜一, "渤海史上の諸問題", 風間書房 (1968)
  27. "田村晃一", 渤海上京龍泉府址の考古學的檢討, ~ (2005)
  28. "발해상경용천부지의 고고학적 검토`in동아시아의 도성과 발해", pp.253~254 (2008), 동북아역사재단
  29. 池內宏, "通溝" (1938), 日滿文化協會
  30. 蘇才, "吉林集安高句麗建築遺址的淸理" (1961), 考古
  31. "國立扶餘博物館", -扶餘 陵山里寺址 發掘調査 進展報告書, ~ (2000)
  32. 方起東, "集安東臺子高句麗建築遺址的性質和年代" (1982), 東北考古與歷史
  33. 고건축분야-, "장경호", 백제역사재현단지 조사연구보고서, ~ (1996)
  34. 신광섭, "百濟 泗沘時代 陵寺 硏究", 박사, pp.2006
  35. 李炳鎬, "扶餘 陵山里 出土 木簡의 性格", 木簡硏究, (창간) (2008)
  36. 金吉植, "百濟 始祖 仇台廟와 陵山里寺址", 韓國考古學報, 69 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)