중학교 사회 교과서에 나오는 서양 고대사 서술의 문제
Problems of Description about Ancient European History in the textbooks of Society for Middle Schools
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Descriptions about Ancient European History in the textbooks of Socety Ⅱ for Middle Schools have some problems. At first, those are disproportionate on themes. In other words, those descriptions only deal with Greek and Roman History. Because the History of Ancient Near East is omitted, middle school students are apt to be affected by Eurocentrism. Next, those descriptions about Ancient European History have some mistakes, misunderstandings, misinterpretations. What makes those descriptions have some problems ? I think that there are two factors. Firstly, a few pages are allotted for descriptions about Ancient European History, that is, just 9.44 pages are allotted. Therefore, these a few pages make those descriptions to be abbreviate and omit. As a result of it, the history of Ancient Near East is disappeared, and other problems arise. Secondly, all textbooks have just one or two authors about western history. And those authors are mostly teachers of middle school or high school. But those textbooks don't have any consultation by scholars. Even for easy learning, those teachers may be more proper than scholars, but the checking procedure is required for accurate descriptions.
Abstract
Descriptions about Ancient European History in the textbooks of Socety Ⅱ for Middle Schools have some problems. At first, those are disproportionate on themes. In other words, those descriptions only deal with Greek and Roman History. Because the History of Ancient Near East is omitted, middle school students are apt to be affected by Eurocentrism. Next, those descriptions about Ancient European History have some mistakes, misunderstandings, misinterpretations. What makes those descriptions have some problems ? I think that there are two factors. Firstly, a few pages are allotted for descriptions about Ancient European History, that is, just 9.44 pages are allotted. Therefore, these a few pages make those descriptions to be abbreviate and omit. As a result of it, the history of Ancient Near East is disappeared, and other problems arise. Secondly, all textbooks have just one or two authors about western history. And those authors are mostly teachers of middle school or high school. But those textbooks don't have any consultation by scholars. Even for easy learning, those teachers may be more proper than scholars, but the checking procedure is required for accurate descriptions.
참고문헌 (26)
- 민석홍, "서양사개론", pp.54~ (1985), 삼영사
- 김창성, "세계사 산책 - 서양 고대" (2003), 솔 출판사
- L. de Blois, "서양 고대문명의 역사" (2003), 다락방
- John Boardman, "The Oxford History of Greece and the Hellenistic World", pp.275~ (2001), Oxford Univ. Press
- R. Castleden, "Minoans" (1993), Routledge
- H, Michell, "스파르타" (2000), 신서원
- 김봉철, "영원한 문화도시 아테네" (2002), 청년사
- 지동식, "고전고대 희랍사연구의 제문제", pp.179~206 (1984), 고려대학교 출판부
- A.H.M. 존즈, "서양 고전고대 경제와 노예제" (1981), 법문사
- M. I. 핀리, "서양 고대경제" (1993), 민음사
- A. Andrews, "고대 그리스사", pp.197~ (1991), 이론과 실천
- 양병우, "아테네 민주정치사", pp.2~ (1976), 서울대 출판부
- 최자영, "고대 그리스 법제사", pp.161~162 (2007), 아카넷
- 변정심, "기원전 5세기 아테네의 프닉스 민회장", 서양고대사연구, 7, pp.23~42 (1999)
- 변정심, "기원전 5세기 말 아테네 프닉스 민회장의 개축", 서양고대사연구, 11, pp.57~86 (2002)
- 윤진, "스파르타인, 스파르타 역사", pp.44~51 (2002), 신서원
- 허승일, "스파르타 교육과 시민생활" (1998), 삼영사
- F. W. Walbank, "헬레니즘 세계" (2002), 아카넷
- 윤진, "헬레니즘" (2003), 살림
- 조현미, "알렉산드로스 - 헬레니즘 문명의 전파" (2004), 살림
- 고려대학교 대학원 서양고대사연구실, "서양 고전고대 역사가와 역사서술사론"
- F. Heichelheim, "로마사", pp.134~ (1999), 현대지성사
- 차전환, "로마 공화정의 발달과 몰락, In 서양고대사 강의", pp.260~ (1996), 한울 아카데미
- 金京鉉, "기원전 3세기 Comitia Centuriata(켄투리아회)의 개혁", 서양고대사연구, 8, pp.21~37 (2000)
- 강성길, "공화정 후기 트리부스 선거민회의 투표결과 공표를 위한 절차와 ‘집단투표의 공정성’", 서양고대사연구, 14, pp.117~151 (2004)
- 강성길, "로마 트리부스 입법 및 사법 민회에서 추첨과 투표기록판(tabulae)의 역할을 통해본 집단 투표", 서양고대사연구, (18), pp.123~151 (2006), 한국서양고대역사문화학회