일제시기 창원군 「임야조사서」 분석과 소유구조 변화

Abstract

This article analyzes the Research Paper of Forest in Chang-Won County which is the original evaluation based on the researches of woodlands and the survey of each lot. It is to grasp the currents of the ownership of national forests and civil-owned-fields in Changwon and understand the ownership changes. The Paper shows that the civil-owned national ratio(85% of the total lots and 67% of the total area) is far greater than the national(15% of the lots and 33% the area). The private ownership is greate importance in civil ownership(98.5% of the lots and 98.1% of the areas). Changwon county's national forests have some special features like this. First, the Yungorim(緣故林)of the Bulyojonrim(不要存林) holds the majority in the total nationals and most of their loans are alloted to the pro-government groups or to its townships. Second, there's no the Yungorim of the Ipheaguanhang. Third, there are many forests which have military purpose in Jinhea and Chunga. The civil-owned forests have some features too. Its share rosed slightly by the forest survey. It also shows that the town ownership has increased for securing its finance on the one hand and for getting the town located in colonial regime on the other. The project has changed the ownership. First the national forests has increased by the way of reversing the Yun-Go-Rim to the national treasury. It was a result of the fact that the Gemynagsiljuck(禁養實積) was just alone applied as a criterion. There was no overall considering that could determine the right of the Yungorim being relevant to the occupations. Second the poor private ownership was created. That was the reason why the research made the management structure not based on the using rights but based on the ownerships. The group ownership like a family land(宗中) and gye(契) was also excluded. Because the project substituted the ownership of autonomous community for the joint-ownership the group ownership and the right of joint use were restricted or dismantled. Those policies individualized the ownership and promoted the small scale ownership widespread.