중국전자서명법에 대한 고찰
Study on China Electronic Signature Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Electronic Commerce has become the leading method of trade in many countries; and the related laws are being established and operated as well in china. However, so far, no law has been established to regulate Electronic Commerce in full scope, and in fact, certain kind of anxiety exists in process to operate Electronic Commerce. In this situation, 《Electronic Signature Law》which has been implemented since April 1st, 2005, by both releasing anxiety due to the absence of Electronic Commerce Law and improving trust and security, it is believed that it will be a milestone to settle Electronic Commerce system in China. The kernel of business affair activities is mainly realized by mutual contract and occasionally, it could be developed in connection with negotiation, conclusion and execution of the contract. As a basic element to compose a contract: summation, agreement, document forms and a seal, should satisfy a certain level of terms and include certain level of effectiveness. The laws of every country have guaranteed a legal validity of the contract and together, it has fixed rights and duties of the both sides via placing specific regulations. However, summation, agreement, document forms and a seal has become unable to satisfy requisition of an original law as a matter of condition and validity, while progression of these business affair activities has moved from traditional method to a Network space. due to a certain kind of limitation in identification of the other person, it became hard to fully-guarantee a mutual benefit under the internet circumstance. Hence, the percentage of internet trading is not high and also there are difficulties in executing businesses such as real estate-deal-contract, stock trading and government supply market. Moreover, to speak about Chinese domestic Electronic Commercial website, both bank payment system and a credit card certification system haven’t been completed yet. Absence of these laws is causing instability in paying and certification of users. What’s worse is that it is reality that it disrupts internet trading circumstance by being a means for criminals to wring money out of a person. The《Electronic Signature Law》of China seems to help find a way out to these problems and encourage establishment of Electronic Commerce Certification System but it has some difference as compared with Korea or international standards that are related to it. Therefore, through this treatise I would like to analyze the essential issue of 《Electronic Signature Law》and lay out reform scheme that corresponds to international standards.
Abstract
The Electronic Commerce has become the leading method of trade in many countries; and the related laws are being established and operated as well in china. However, so far, no law has been established to regulate Electronic Commerce in full scope, and in fact, certain kind of anxiety exists in process to operate Electronic Commerce. In this situation, 《Electronic Signature Law》which has been implemented since April 1st, 2005, by both releasing anxiety due to the absence of Electronic Commerce Law and improving trust and security, it is believed that it will be a milestone to settle Electronic Commerce system in China. The kernel of business affair activities is mainly realized by mutual contract and occasionally, it could be developed in connection with negotiation, conclusion and execution of the contract. As a basic element to compose a contract: summation, agreement, document forms and a seal, should satisfy a certain level of terms and include certain level of effectiveness. The laws of every country have guaranteed a legal validity of the contract and together, it has fixed rights and duties of the both sides via placing specific regulations. However, summation, agreement, document forms and a seal has become unable to satisfy requisition of an original law as a matter of condition and validity, while progression of these business affair activities has moved from traditional method to a Network space. due to a certain kind of limitation in identification of the other person, it became hard to fully-guarantee a mutual benefit under the internet circumstance. Hence, the percentage of internet trading is not high and also there are difficulties in executing businesses such as real estate-deal-contract, stock trading and government supply market. Moreover, to speak about Chinese domestic Electronic Commercial website, both bank payment system and a credit card certification system haven’t been completed yet. Absence of these laws is causing instability in paying and certification of users. What’s worse is that it is reality that it disrupts internet trading circumstance by being a means for criminals to wring money out of a person. The《Electronic Signature Law》of China seems to help find a way out to these problems and encourage establishment of Electronic Commerce Certification System but it has some difference as compared with Korea or international standards that are related to it. Therefore, through this treatise I would like to analyze the essential issue of 《Electronic Signature Law》and lay out reform scheme that corresponds to international standards.
참고문헌 (35)
- 정완용, "전자상거래의 법적 제문제에 관한 고찰", 경희법학, 32(1) (1997)
- 정완용, "전자상거래법" (2002), 법영사
- 배대헌, "거래법상 디지털서명의 효력과 입법을 위한 제언", 계명법학, 2 (1998)
- 배대헌, "“전자서명과 인증”, 「인터넷법률」", ~ (2000)
- 배대헌, "전자상거래 도입에 따른 디지털서명의 법리와 인증기관의 민사책임에 관한 연구", 정보통신학술과제 (1999)
- 배대헌, "전자서명·인터넷 법" (2000), 세창출판사
- 최경진, "“전자상거래와 전자상거래법”, 현실과 미래", ~ (2000)
- 김재두, "전자인증제도에 관한 법적 검토", 상사법연구 (2005)
- 배대헌, "전자거래와 전자서명법상 전자서명의 법리", 소비자문제연구, 22 (1999)
- 배대헌, "전자서명법상 인증기관(certificate authority)의 인증역무에 관한 법률문제", 정보화정책 (2001)
- 김제완, "전자거래에 있어서 인증기관과 그 책임", 고려법학, (37) (2001)
- 배대헌, "인증기관의 손해배상책임에 관한 소론", 인터넷법률, (3) (2000)
- 김동하, "중국 전자상거래 현황과 한국기업의 진출전략", KIEP 세계경제, (33), 대외경제연구원
- Edward A. Cavazos, "Cyberspace and the Law" (1996), MIT Press
- "電子取引法制に關する硏究會報告書, 「シュリスト」No 1138", ~ (1998)
- ?海?, "“向我?走?的《?子?名法》”, 「金融??」, 2004年 11期", ~ (2004)
- 姜楠, "“《?子·名法》上交易的法律保障”,「算机安全」, 2004 10", ~
- ?宇, "《?子?名法》之缺陷及因", 科技·法律, 64 (2006)
- 于海防, "《?子?名法》上的?据?文效力", 烟台大 (哲社科版), 19(2) (2006)
- ?超, "《子名法》的法理解", 安徽商技院」, 1 (2005)
- 楚董皓, "交易安全呼立法保障《子名法(草案)》述", 安全 (2004)
- 程夏, "我《子名法》施程中的相究", 江大(社科版), 23(4) (2006)
- ?重, "“?子?名法能否??信用之??”, 「互??周刊」, 2004.9.6", ~ (2004)
- ?俊升, "《子名法》若干究", 北京案, 10 (2004)
- 奎郭菁, "“《?子?名法》若干???究”, 「科技信息」", ~ (2005)
- 高富平, "?子??等同于?面?据的解?方案-兼?《?子?名法》的局限性", 法, 11 (2004)
- 高晴, "“《?子?名法》?我??子商??展”, 「????」", ????, ~ (2004)
- ?建水, "“?子商???之?究”,「?新?代」", ~ (2005)
- CCNIC, "2005年 中?C2C?子商??究?告", ~ (2005)
- 李世宗, "我??子商???及?展?策?究", 湖北高等科校, 18(1) (2006)
- "Internet Law and Policy Forum (www.ilpf.org)", ~
- "프로라인 (www.proline.co.kr)", ~
- "나라비전 (www. nara.co.kr)", ~
- "안철수연구소 (www.ahnlab.com)", ~
- "상하이24 (www.shanghai24.net)", ~
