특허법상 분할출원제도 개선방안
A study on divisional patent applications
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
An applicant for a patent may divide a patent application comprising two or more inventions into one or more new patent applications, where the new application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the original application. Recent increase not only in the number of filing but also in strategic use of divisional applications ask for new rules. First of all, the time limit for filing divisional applications should be expanded so that the division can be made both within the designated time limit after notice of allowance and within 30 days after notice of rejection even without appeal to that decision. Next, the KIPO examination guidelines with regard to the case of a sequence of divisional applications should be changed. According to the existing rule, where an original application(the parent application) is divided into a divisional application(the child application) and the child application is divided into another divisional application(grandchild application), the grandchild application is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the parent application, provided that the child application meets all the requirements for division as to the parent application, and that the grandchild application meets all the requirements for division as to the child application. Since it is a generally accepted principle of patent law that once a divisional application has been validly filed it becomes separate and independent from the parent application, the subsequent fate of the earlier application pending or not can not affect the proceedings on the divisional application. Thus, in the case of a sequence of applications consisting of a root application followed by divisional applications, each divided from its predecessor, according the filing date of the root application should be justified if the subject matter was disclosed in each of the preceding applications so that it was thereby existing at all times throughout after its disclosure in the root application as filed up to and including the date of filing the divisional application under consideration. Finally, some measures, such as fee increase for filing more than two divisionals or to make final a first office action in a divisional application where some conditions are met, should be taken to prevent abuse of divisional applications.
Abstract
An applicant for a patent may divide a patent application comprising two or more inventions into one or more new patent applications, where the new application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the original application. Recent increase not only in the number of filing but also in strategic use of divisional applications ask for new rules. First of all, the time limit for filing divisional applications should be expanded so that the division can be made both within the designated time limit after notice of allowance and within 30 days after notice of rejection even without appeal to that decision. Next, the KIPO examination guidelines with regard to the case of a sequence of divisional applications should be changed. According to the existing rule, where an original application(the parent application) is divided into a divisional application(the child application) and the child application is divided into another divisional application(grandchild application), the grandchild application is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the parent application, provided that the child application meets all the requirements for division as to the parent application, and that the grandchild application meets all the requirements for division as to the child application. Since it is a generally accepted principle of patent law that once a divisional application has been validly filed it becomes separate and independent from the parent application, the subsequent fate of the earlier application pending or not can not affect the proceedings on the divisional application. Thus, in the case of a sequence of applications consisting of a root application followed by divisional applications, each divided from its predecessor, according the filing date of the root application should be justified if the subject matter was disclosed in each of the preceding applications so that it was thereby existing at all times throughout after its disclosure in the root application as filed up to and including the date of filing the divisional application under consideration. Finally, some measures, such as fee increase for filing more than two divisionals or to make final a first office action in a divisional application where some conditions are met, should be taken to prevent abuse of divisional applications.
참고문헌 (14)
- 임해영, "“고객의 요구를 반영한 맞춤형 특허제도 발전방안 연구”, 특허청 연구보고서, 2007.8", ~ (2007)
- 특허청, "심사지침, 2007", ~ (2007)
- 특허청, "우리나라 특허법제에 대한 연혁적 고찰, 2007.5", ~ (2007)
- 특허청, "지식재산백서, 2008", ~ (2008)
- 中山信弘, "특허판례백선" (2005), 박영사
- 石橋, "分割出願制度の改正", パテント, 60(9) (2007), 日本弁理士
- 日本 特許第1委員會제1小委員會, "新分割出願制度に?する提言-フロントランナ?の保護, 制度の國際調和の?点を中心に-", 知財管理, 55(11) (2005), 日本知的財産協會
- 日本 特許廳, "特許??用新案審査基準, 2007.3.13", ~ (2007)
- 日本 特許第1委員? 第4小委員?, "國內外の分割出願制度の見直しについて-改正分割出願制度(日本)を中心に-", 知財管理, 57(8) (2007), 日本知的財産協會
- 日本 國際第2委員? 第1小委員?, "州特許における分割出願", 知財管理, 57(9) (2007), 日本知的財産協會
- Gerald Numrich, "州における分割出願に?する審決の分析", パテント, 60(11) (2007), 日本弁理士
- Nicholas Jones, "Justin Wilson", 州特許分割出願-?大審判部による?用主義への回?-, 2007, pp.52(10), ~
- "Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office", ~
- "USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedure", ~
