근대 일본인과 이병도의 진번군 인식

Abstract

The study of Zhenpanjun by modern Japanese begins with the claim that Zhenpanjun is in the north. First, the argument that Zhenpanjun is in the north was initiated by Michiyo Naka and continued by Takajiro Higuchi and Shiratori. Naka Michiyo is significant in that he was the first modern Japanese to claim that Zhenpanjun is in the north. Michiyo Naka's claim that Zhenpanjun is in the north also had the same effect on his disciple Shiratori. However, the claim that Zhenpanjun is in the north was denied by Inaba and Imanishi, and then again by Ikeuchi. The claim that Zhenpanjun is in the north is also denied by Lee-byoungdo in 1929. It can be seen that the modern Japanese study of Zhenpanjun was born in the historical background of Japan's advance into Manchuria. In other words, Zhenpanjun research can be seen as a result of modern Japan's interest in Chosun and Manchuria. Eventually, after Inaba and Lee- byoungdo, the claim that Zhenpanjun was in the south emerged as the mainstream theory and continues to this day. Inaba argued for the Zhenpanjun Chungchengdo theory as part of his claim that Zhenpanjun was in the south, while Imanishi and Ikeuchi went further and argued for the Chungchengdo and Jeonlabukdo theories. Lee-byoungdo said that Zhenpanjun is north of the Han-river. The historical basis for claiming that Zhenpanjun is in the south lies in the ‘Zhenpanzhili’ appearing in 『Wulingshu』 and 『Shiji』. These modern Japanese theories of Zhenpanjun Chungchengdo and Jeonlabukdo raise the issue of expanding Hansijun's territory not only to the central part of the ‘peninsula’ but also to the southern area. Also, when basing the location of Zhenpanjun on 『Wulingshu』, a lack of space in the ‘peninsula’ is pointed out. Therefore, from the perspective of the migration theory, it can be said that it is reasonable to say that Zhenpanjun moved from Liaodong to Hwanghaedo.