국제상사중재에 있어서 중재합의 방식의 서면성 완화
A Study on Relaxation of Formal Requirements on the Form of International Commercial Arbitration Agreement
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The principal contents of the UNCITRAL “Revised Model Law” adopted in 2006 relate to the form of the arbitration agreement. The text of the provision on the form of the arbitration agreement in Article 7 of the revised Model Law was modelled on Article Ⅱ (2) of the New York Convention of 1958. The revision of Article 7 is intended to reflect the practice in international trade and technological developments. The document requirements under Article 35(2) were also amended in 2006 to liberalize formal requirements and reflect the amendment made to Article 7 on the form of the arbitration agreement. The Federal Arbitration Act places arbitration agreements on equal footing with other contracts, they are subject to traditional principle of American law allow a contract to be enforced by or against non- signatories to the contract through incorporation by reference, assumption, piercing the corporate veil, alter-ego, third party beneficiary theories. The formation of the rule varies slightly from one judgment to the other. Initially there was a certain insistence on the fact that when the non-signatories had participated in the performance of the contract, and had been aware of the existence of the clause, it was to be presumed that it had accepted to be bound by the clause. The arbitration agreement shall be in writing. An agreement is in writing if it is contained in a document signed by the parties or in an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommuni- cation which provide a record of the agreement, or in an exchange of statements of claim and defence in which the existence of an agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by another. The reference in a contract to a document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an arbitration agreement provided that the contract is in writing and the reference is such as to make that clause part of the contract.
Abstract
The principal contents of the UNCITRAL “Revised Model Law” adopted in 2006 relate to the form of the arbitration agreement. The text of the provision on the form of the arbitration agreement in Article 7 of the revised Model Law was modelled on Article Ⅱ (2) of the New York Convention of 1958. The revision of Article 7 is intended to reflect the practice in international trade and technological developments. The document requirements under Article 35(2) were also amended in 2006 to liberalize formal requirements and reflect the amendment made to Article 7 on the form of the arbitration agreement. The Federal Arbitration Act places arbitration agreements on equal footing with other contracts, they are subject to traditional principle of American law allow a contract to be enforced by or against non- signatories to the contract through incorporation by reference, assumption, piercing the corporate veil, alter-ego, third party beneficiary theories. The formation of the rule varies slightly from one judgment to the other. Initially there was a certain insistence on the fact that when the non-signatories had participated in the performance of the contract, and had been aware of the existence of the clause, it was to be presumed that it had accepted to be bound by the clause. The arbitration agreement shall be in writing. An agreement is in writing if it is contained in a document signed by the parties or in an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommuni- cation which provide a record of the agreement, or in an exchange of statements of claim and defence in which the existence of an agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by another. The reference in a contract to a document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an arbitration agreement provided that the contract is in writing and the reference is such as to make that clause part of the contract.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김갑유, "중재실무강의" (2012), 박영사
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구(제1권)" (2007), 박영사
- 양병회, "주석 중재법" (2006), 대한상사중재원
- 강병근, "국제투자계약에 서명하지 않은 국가의 중재당사자 지위", 통상법률, (86)통권 : 86, pp.103~125 (2009), 법무부
- 강이수, "선하증권과 중재합의의 효력", 중재연구, 12(2), pp.303~336 (2003), 한국중재학회
- 김경욱, "중재당사자의 파산이 중재절차에 미치는 영향", 민사소송, 10(2), pp.291~325 (2006), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김상균, "미국에서의 복수당사자 중재에 관하여", 원광법학, 25(1), pp.341~370 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김인현, "鐵道運送人의 히말라야 約款상 責任制限規定 원용가능성- 美國 聯邦大法院 2004.11.9. 커비 사건을 중심으로-", 상사판례연구, 19(3), pp.315~348 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 노태악, "UNCITRAL 모델중재법 및 중재규칙 개정에 따른 국내법 개정의 필요성 검토", 국제사법연구, (16), pp.111~150 (2010), 한국국제사법학회
- 목영준, "국제계약에 있어서의 중재조항", 사법논집, 21 (1990)
- 서세원, "미국에 있어서 비서명자에 대한 중재합의의 효력", 중재연구, 18(1), pp.71~96 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 서영화, "용선계약의 선하증권에의 편입", 한국해법회지, 14(1) (1992)
- 석광현, "중재법의 개정방향- 국제상사중재의 측면을 중심으로 -", 서울대학교 법학, 53(3), pp.533~588 (2012), 법학연구소
- 석광현, "뉴욕협약상 중재합의에 관한 몇 가지 문제점 –대법원 2004. 12. 20. 선고 2004다20180 판결이 제기한 쟁점들을 중심으로", 국제사법과 국제소송, 4 (2007)
- 석광현, "국제상사중재에서의 중재합의에 관한 법적 문제점 - 대법원 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2004다20180 판결이 제기한 뉴욕협약상의 쟁점들을 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 15(2), pp.225~261 (2005), 한국중재학회
- 손경한, "중재합의에 대한 새로운 고찰", 중재연구, 23(1), pp.55~85 (2013), 한국중재학회
- 송덕수, "제3자를 위한 계약", 민법주해, 8 (1997)
- 안건형, "2011 프랑스 개정 민사소송법의 주요 내용과 시사점 – 국제중재법을 중심으로 –", 민사소송, 15(2), pp.93~121 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- 이강빈, "국제상사중재에 관한 UNCITRAL 모델법의 개정동향", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.53~89 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 이성희, "영미법에서의 외관적 권한법리와 우리 민법 제125조의 적용요건에 관한 검토", 민사법학, 58, pp.3~34 (2012), 한국민사법학회
- 이순우, "용선계약상 중재조항이 선하증권에도 자동삽입되는가?", 중재, (297) (2000)
- 이형욱, "항해용선계약상 선하증권의 편입문구에 관한 법리적 해석에 관한 연구", 해운물류연구, 26(2), pp.273~298 (2010), 한국해운물류학회
- 임치용, "판례를 통해본 국제도산법의 쟁점", BFL, (38) (2009), 서울대 금융법센터
- 주기동, "용선계약내용의 선하증권에의 편입", 사법논집, 18 (1987)
- 채동헌, "용선계약상의 중재조항과 선하증권에의 편입", 대법원판례해설, 통권 : 44 (2004)
- 최세련, "상법 제798조 제2항의 해석 및 적용에 대한 검토", 해상･보험법연구, 5(1) (2009)
- Born, Gary B, "International Commercial Arbitration" (2001), Transnational Publishers
- Born Gary B., "International Commercial Arbitration, Volume Ⅰ" (2009), Kluwer Law International
- Gaskell, Nicholas, "Bills of Lading: Law and Contracts" (2000), LLP Professional Publishing
- Gilmore, Grant, "The Law of Admiralty" (1975), Foundation Press Inc.
- Mocatta, Alan Abraham, "Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading" (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
- Moses, Margaret L, "The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Nigel Balckaby, "Redfern and Hunter on International Commercial Arbitration" (2009)
- Sutton, David S., "Russel on Arbitration" (1997), Sweet & Maxwell
- Tetley, William, "Marine Cargo Claims" (1988), Blais
- Van den Berg, Albert Jan, "The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958" (1981), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers
- Wilson, John F, "Carriage of Goods by Sea", pp.2008, Pearson
- Costabel, Attilio M., "The Himalaya clause crosses privity's far frontier", Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 36(2) (2005)
- Sturley, M. F., "Modernizing and Reforming U.S. Maritime Law: The Rotterdam Rules in the United States", Texas International Law Journal, (Spring) (2009)
- Tetley, William, "The Himalaya Clause-Revised", Journal of International Maritime Law, 6 (2003)
- Wormser, I. Maurice, "Piecing the Veil of Corporate Entity", Colum. L. Rev., 12, pp.496~ (1912)
- Zuberbhler, Tobias, "Non-Signatories and the Consensus to Arbitrate", ASA Bulletin, 26(1) (2008)