도급 대상으로서 업무의 구체성과 불법파견 판단과의 관계 재검토
Trends and labor law issues of outsourcing
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Specialization of today's manufacturing business through external workforce is a global trend. But, a contract for work may receive assessment by using an illegal workforce. Therefore, disambiguating a standard of judgment became so important legislative policy issues. First, a contract relationship must be defined the contents of the contract work clearly and concretely in advance. If the contents of the contract work defined too extensive and the specific details contents determined through order of contractor, examples of which may be illegal use of external workforce. But, the contents of the contract work connote variable circumstances in case if the detailed contents of work determined later or if the regularly check requested because of the nature of work, such business coach and poetic inspection should see that justice be carried out on the basis of an agreement on the contracts. The order in this limit is seen as a legitimate contract order of person who ordered any work. Second, in the case of work in the outer shape of the space and the work itself mixed have to be distinguished. Simply identical a workspace has the commonness of the place but the business must be seen as a seperated. In this case, it cannot be seen the illegal using of external workforce. With a working space, the work is illegal utilization external resources only where this is a problem running unitarily due to the user's instruction. Therefore, placing on the basis of clear indicators of illegal dispatch without locally mixed loading is too hasty judgement. Looking strictly subcontracting relationship is not satisfied on the basis of a labor contract. However, a number of workers inside and outside the worker in the business area in cooperation with each other and participate in the production process. So if a company can not be seen as a direct labor contract relationship is formed, it can be assessed in production community for services performed. And so looking at the production community and see things that evaluates both internal employees and external workers with colleagues is important. For order discipline in workplace in subcontracting relationship should be applied to both quantum directly. It include all the workplace access, order discipline and the benefits of further welfare dimension. Therefore, the relationship between cooperation and regulation prime·subcontractor made within these categories can not be viewed as an illegal workforce outside grounds. In addition, it should not be seen as illegal that the prime company directly paid to the subcontractor employees for providing a bonus by productivity or occupational safety issues.
Abstract
Specialization of today's manufacturing business through external workforce is a global trend. But, a contract for work may receive assessment by using an illegal workforce. Therefore, disambiguating a standard of judgment became so important legislative policy issues. First, a contract relationship must be defined the contents of the contract work clearly and concretely in advance. If the contents of the contract work defined too extensive and the specific details contents determined through order of contractor, examples of which may be illegal use of external workforce. But, the contents of the contract work connote variable circumstances in case if the detailed contents of work determined later or if the regularly check requested because of the nature of work, such business coach and poetic inspection should see that justice be carried out on the basis of an agreement on the contracts. The order in this limit is seen as a legitimate contract order of person who ordered any work. Second, in the case of work in the outer shape of the space and the work itself mixed have to be distinguished. Simply identical a workspace has the commonness of the place but the business must be seen as a seperated. In this case, it cannot be seen the illegal using of external workforce. With a working space, the work is illegal utilization external resources only where this is a problem running unitarily due to the user's instruction. Therefore, placing on the basis of clear indicators of illegal dispatch without locally mixed loading is too hasty judgement. Looking strictly subcontracting relationship is not satisfied on the basis of a labor contract. However, a number of workers inside and outside the worker in the business area in cooperation with each other and participate in the production process. So if a company can not be seen as a direct labor contract relationship is formed, it can be assessed in production community for services performed. And so looking at the production community and see things that evaluates both internal employees and external workers with colleagues is important. For order discipline in workplace in subcontracting relationship should be applied to both quantum directly. It include all the workplace access, order discipline and the benefits of further welfare dimension. Therefore, the relationship between cooperation and regulation prime·subcontractor made within these categories can not be viewed as an illegal workforce outside grounds. In addition, it should not be seen as illegal that the prime company directly paid to the subcontractor employees for providing a bonus by productivity or occupational safety issues.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강성태, "위법한 파견근로와 사용사업주의 책임", 노동법연구, 13, pp.6~196 (2002), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 강성태, "간접고용 입법, 「간접고용 실태 및 법·제도 개선 과제」", 전태일 주간기념 민주노총 정책토론회 자료집, 전국민주노동조합총연맹, ~ (2008)
- 강성태, "위법파견의 사법(私法)적 효과", 노동법연구, (29), pp.67~93 (2010), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 강성태, "지금 왜 사용자인가?", 노동법연구, (24), pp.1~22 (2008), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 권혁, "독일에서의 사내하도급 활용 현황과 그 시사점", 노동법포럼, (7) (2011), 노동법이론실무학회
- 권혁, "도급의 대상으로서‘ 업무’와 위장도급 논쟁", 노동법포럼, (11), pp.97~121 (2013), 노동법이론실무학회
- 비정규직의 업무의 외주화 전환에 대한 대응책, 외주용역 전환 등 간접고용 남용규제 방안, "김상호", 한국노동조합총연맹, ~ (2007)
- 김선수, "비정규직법의 문제점과 입법방향, 비정규직법 시행 1년 문제점과 해결방향", 전국민주노동조합총연맹, ~ (2008)
- 김영문, "사내하도급 근로자들의 원청기업에 대한 단체교섭 가부", 노동법학, (36), pp.155~200 (2010), 한국노동법학회
- 남효순, "민법(재산편)개정공청회", 법무부, ~ (2001)
- 노동부 조선업종 하도급업체 운영실태 점검 결과 검토보고서, "단병호", ~ (2004)
- 도재형, "사내하도급 관계에서 근로자파견의 인정 기준", 법조, 60(8), pp.131~174 (2011), 법조협회
- 문무기, "간접고용(근로자공급 하도급 파견 용역)규율의 법리", 월간노동리뷰, (4) (2005)
- 박수근, "간접고용 근로자의 집단적 노동분쟁과 쟁점의 검토 - 최근 발생한 중요한 사례를 중심으로", 노동법연구, (24), pp.23~52 (2008), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 박수근, "비정규직법 정착을 위한 과제 및 바람직한 법 개정방안, 비정규직법 시행 1년, 진단과 제도개선 방향", 한국노총 정책토론회, ~ (2008)
- 박제성, "기업집단과 노동법: 노사협의와 단체교섭", 노동법연구, (21), pp.171~209 (2006), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 이재용, "위장도급과 불법파견에 있어 고용관계", 노동법학, (22), pp.35~65 (2006), 한국노동법학회
- 박종희, "사내하도급과 파견의 구별기준 및 불법파견의 법률효과", 조정과 심판, (가을) (2010), 중앙노동위원회
- 박지순, "비정규직법의 쟁점과 입법정책적 과제", 산업관계연구, 19(2), pp.27~65 (2009), 한국고용노사관계학회
- 정영훈, "일본의 사내하도급.파견현황 및 제도에 관한 검토", 노동법포럼, (6), pp.161~210 (2011), 노동법이론실무학회
- 조경배, "사내하도급에 있어서 원청의 사용자성 - 현대중공업 부당노동행위 사건을 중심으로 -", 노동법연구, (25), pp.213~235 (2008), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 조경배, "직접고용의 원칙과 파견근로", 민주법학, (19) (2001)
- 근로자파견대상업무 조정·확대방안에 대한 검토, "한인상", 국회입법조사처, ~ (2011)
- Becker, "Zur Abgrenzung des Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsvertrage gegenüber anderen Vertragstypen mit drittbezogenem Personaleinsatz, ZfA 1978, 139", ~ (1978)
- Boemke, "Arbeitsformen der Zukunft", ~ (2000)
- Hamann, "Fremdpersonal im Unternehmen - Alternativen zum Arbeitsvertrag", ~ (2003)
- Hamann, "Erkennungsmerkmale der illegalen Arbeitnehmerüberlassung in Form von Scheindienst- und Scheinwerkverträgen", pp.267~ (1995), Münster
- Hromadka, "Arbeitnehmerbegriff und Arbeitsrecht - Zur Diskussion um die "neue Selbständigkeit", NZA, pp.569~ (1997)
- Konzen, "Arbeitsrechtliche Drittbeziehungen", ZfA, pp.259~ (1982)
- Leitner, "Abgrenzung zwischen Werkvertrag und Arbeitnehmerüber- lassung", pp.293~ (1991), NZA
- Lotmar, "Der Arbeitsvertrag", ~ (1941)
- Rüthers, "om Sinn und Unsinn des geltenden Kündigungsschutzrechts", NJW, pp.1601~ (2002)
- Schüren, "Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz Kommentar" (2003), München
- Sinzheimer, "in: Arbeitsrecht und Rechtssoziologie" (1976)
- Ulber, "Rechtliche Grenzen des Einsatzes von betriebsfremden Arbeit- nehmern und Mitbestimmungsrechte des Betriebsrats", AuR, pp.5~ (1982)
- Walle, "Der Einsatz von Fremdpersonal auf Werkvertragsbasis", 114~ (1998)
- Weber, "Das aufgespaltene Arbeitsverhältnis", ~ (1992)