본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유럽연합 DSM 저작권지침상 간행물 발행자의 보호

Protection of Publishers under the EU DSM Copyright Directive

이대희|박민주|최신영
한국경영법률학회 (The Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration And Law)|2019.07|경영법률 (Journal of Business Administration & Law)|제29권 제4호|pp. 241-279

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

하이퍼링크Hyperlink디지털단일시장DSM 지침뉴스 통합서비스제공자부수적 권리구글세발췌물언론 간행물발행자가치의 차이Digital Single Market(DSM)DSM Copyright DirectiveNews AggregatorAncillary RightGoogle TaxPress PublicationsPublisherValue GapSnippet
주제분류법학

초록

유럽연합 디지털 단일시장 저작권지침(이하 ‘DSM 지침’이라 칭함) 제15조는, 정보사회서비스제공자(information society service provider)가 언론간행물을 온라인에서 이용할 경우, 발행자에게 복제권과 공중이용제공권 등을 부여하고, 이용에 따른 공정하고 비례적인 보상을 받을 수 있도록 하는 내용으로 규정되어 있다. 사실, DSM 지침에 의한 언론간행물 발행자의 온라인 이용에 관한 보호는 이미 독일과 스페인에서 입법되었던 소위 ‘부수적 권리(ancillary right)’와 관련되어 있다. 부수적 권리는 저작권의 보호 영역에 존재하지 않았던 대상(subject matter), 즉 저작권에 의하여 보호되지 않았던 대상을 마치 저작권으로 보호하는 것처럼 배타적인 권리로 보호하고 침해에 대한 구제수단을 제공하는 것이다. 그런데 스페인 및 독일의 부수적 권리에 관한 여러 연구 결과들에 의하면, 부수적 권리를 인정함으로써 여러 가지 부정적인 결과가 발생하는 것으로 분석되었다. 독일과 스페인의 경우, 발행자가 일정한 보상을 받도록 하고자 하였던 입법 목적은 달성하지 못한 것으로 보여진다. 그러나 유럽연합 회원국 전역(영국 제외)에 걸쳐서 시행될 DSM 지침은 2개국에 한정되어 인정되었던 부수적 저작권과는 다른 결과를 불러일으킬 것으로 보인다. 경험적 연구들의 분석 결과는, DSM 지침에 의해 발행자들에게 인정된 권리와 관련하여 유럽연합 회원국들이 취할 전략을 결정하는데 고려요소가 될 것으로 보인다. 이 글은 언론간행물을 온라인상에서 이용하는 것에 관한 DSM 지침 제15조와 유사한 입법을 하고 있었던 독일 및 스페인의 상황을 상세히 고찰하고, 이와 관련된 쟁점을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다.

Abstract

EU DSM Copyright Directive article 15 shall provide protection of press publications concerning online uses. Under the DSM Copyright Directive, the publishers shall be entitled to receive a appropriate share of the revenues that press publishers receive for the use of their publications by information society service providers. In Fact, the protection of press publications concerning online uses under DSM Directive is related to the so-called “ancillary right”, which is already enacted in Germany and Spain. However, several studies on the impact of legislation on Germany and Spain ancillary right on news publishers have revealed that adverse side-effect result in number of negative consequences. In addition, the legislation of Germany and Spain, which granted the exclusive right of so-called ancillary right seems to have failed to achieve the objective of publishers receiving certain compensation. However, the DSM Directive, which will be imple- mented across whole states of the European Union (Expect for the United Kingdom), is likely to produce results different from the ancillary rights limited to the two countries. The results of empirical studies are likely to be a consideration for the European Union member states in determining the strategy they will take in relation to the rights granted to publishers by DSM directive. This article aims to analyze Article 15 of the DSM Directive on the Protection of Press Publications Concerning Online Uses, to examine in detail the situation in Germany and Spain, which had been legislating similar to the DSM Directive, and to analyze the issues involved.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. The impact of news aggregators on Internet news consumption, "Athey, S", Stanford University Institute for Economic Policy Research, ~, pp.Stanford University Institute for Economic Policy Research(SIEPR) Working Paper, No.17-034 (2017)
  2. "DSM Watch: Copyright Directive press publishers’ rights: final edition of Article 11 is now Article 15, Hogan Lovells Global Media and Communications Watch" (2019)[URL]
  3. "Ancillary Copyright for Publishers-Taking Stock in Germany" (2015)[URL]
  4. Bo Vesterdorf, "The Effect of Failure to Notify the Spanish and German Ancillary Copyright Laws", European Intellectual Property Review, (5) (2015)
  5. What do News Aggregators Do? Evidence from Google News in Spain and Germany, "Calzada, J", SSRN, ~ (2018)
  6. Assessing copyright exceptions, report for the European Commission (DG Market), "Charles River Associates", ~ (2014)
  7. Understanding “Ancillary Copyright” in the Global Intellectual Property Environment, Working paper, "Computer & Communications Industry Association", ~ (2015)
  8. "EU Copyright Directive: what does it mean, and should you be worried?" (2019)[URL]
  9. Dellarocas, C, "Attention Allocation in Information-Rich Environments: The Case of News Aggregators", Management Science, 62(9), pp.2543~2562 (2016)
  10. "Directive 2001", 29, Official Journal L, pp.2001, 167~
  11. "Directive 2012", 28, Official Journal L, pp.2012, 299~
  12. "Directive (EU) 2017", 1564 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2017 on certain permitted uses of certain works and other subject matter protected by copyright and related rights for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print-disabled and amending Directive 2001, EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, pp.Official Journal L, 2017[DOI]
  13. "Directive 98", 34, Official Journal L, pp.1998, 204~
  14. Eleonora Rosati, "The German ‘Google Tax’ law: groovy or greedy?", Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 8(7) (2013)
  15. "Google announces end of News in Spain" (2014)[URL]
  16. European Commission, "A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe (Brussels, 6.5.2015) COM", ~ (2015)
  17. "Digital Single Market, Modernisation of the EU copyright rules"[URL]
  18. European Commission, "Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market", ~ (2016)
  19. "Questions and Answers–European Parliament's vote in favour of modernised rules fit for digital age" (2019)[URL]
  20. "European Parliament approves new copyright rules for the internet" (2019)[URL]
  21. "Questions and Answers on issues about the digital copyright directive" (2019)[URL]
  22. "European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 March 2019 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market, (COM(2016) 0593-C8-0383", 2016–2016, pp.2016, ~
  23. European Political Strategy Centre, "Online News Aggregation and Neighbouring Rights for News Publishers", ~ (2017)
  24. "German Publisher Axel Springer: Loss Of Snippets Caused 80 Percent Traffic Drop, Search Engine Lands" (2014)[URL]
  25. Gruenberger, M, "The German news publishers’ ancillary right, slides presented at the Amsterdam conference on neighbouring rights, organised by Institute for Information Rights", pp.2016
  26. Harro Ten Wolde, "Germany's top publisher bows to Google in news licensing row", ~ (2014)
  27. Online music sales, sales displacement and internet search: evidence from YouTube, "Hiller, R", Center for the Analysis of Property rights and Innovation, ~, pp.Center for the Analysis of Property rights and Innovation (CAPRI), Publication 13-2 (2015)
  28. "Germany’s publishers take on Google" (2016)[URL]
  29. Jeon, D, "News Aggregators and Competition among Newspapers on the Internet", American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8(4), pp.91~114 (2016)
  30. "Google News Shuttered in Spain Thanks to “Ancillary Copyright” Law" (2014)[URL]
  31. "Letter to Dear Vice-President Ansip, Dear Commissioner Oettinger, Dear First Vice-President Timmermans, Dear Commissioner Jourová" (2015)[URL]
  32. Lee, A. M, "The Rise of Online News Aggregators: Consumption and Competition", International Journal on Media Management, 17(1) (2015)
  33. Lesley Chiou, "Content aggregation by platforms: the case of the news media", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 26(4) (2017)
  34. "External traffic to Spanish news sites plummets after Google move" (2014)[URL]
  35. "Google v. Belgium “link war” ends after years of conflict" (2011)[URL]
  36. "Copyright Protection for Quotations? An Explainer on Ancillary Rights in Europe, Disruptive Competition Project(DisCo)" (2014)[URL]
  37. "What the heck is ancillary copyright and why do we call it the Link Tax?" (2016)[URL]
  38. Impact on Competition and on Free Market of the Google Tax or AEDE fee, "NERA Economic Consulting", Spanish Association of Publishers of Periodical Publications, ~ (2017)
  39. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014: Tracking the Future of News, "David A. L. Levy", N. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, ~ (2014)
  40. Parker, Geoffrey, "Two-sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design", Management Science, 51(10), pp.1494~1504 (2005)
  41. Modernisation of the EU Copyright Rules, "Reto M. Hilty", Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, ~, pp.Research Paper No. 17-12 (2017)
  42. "Prohibition of compensation in criminal turnover tax law–Basic ruling of the BGH of 13 September 2018 – 1 StR 642", 17, 2018
  43. The Impact of News Aggregators on Internet News Consumption: The Case of Localization, "Susan Athey", Stanford University SIEPR, ~, pp.Stanford University SIEPR Working Paper No. 3353 (2012)
  44. "Google sets up £52m fund to settle French publishing row" (2013)[URL]
  45. "Google Said to Violate Copyright Laws" (2007)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

EU의 뉴스 저작물 보호 입법 - DSM 저작권 지침의 입법학적 함의를 중심으로 -심우민유럽헌법학회 · 유럽헌법연구2020 · 제34호유럽연합 디지털 단일시장 저작권 지침의 개혁적 함의이원한국문화관광연구원 · 문화정책논총2019 · 제33권 제2호EU DSM 저작권지침에서의 온라인 콘텐츠 공유 서비스제공자의 책임이대희, 최신영한국사법학회 · 비교사법2019 · 제26권 제2호EU의 저작권 지침 개정에 따른 온라인 플랫폼 규제의 변화: 프랑스의 언론출판사 저작인접권 입법의 쟁점과 시사점이원법무부 · 국제법무연구2024 · 제3호온라인 서비스제공자의 뉴스저작권 침해가능성에 대한 비교법 연구- 유럽연합의 디지털 단일시장에서의 저작권에 대한 지침안과 독일저작권법을 중심으로 -박신욱한국재산법학회 · 재산법연구2018 · 제35권 제3호언론출판사의 저작인접권 도입에 관한 소고나강한국상사판례학회 · 상사판례연구2016 · 제29권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

「주식회사 등의 외부감사에 관한 법률」상 감사의 역할 검토권재열pp. 1-29비상장회사의 지배구조와 감사제도서완석, 이영철pp. 31-68경업거래, 기회유용 및 손해배상 －대판 2018.10.25, 2016 다 16191의 평석을 겸하여－김정호pp. 69-117미국 임원보수 공시제도에 관한 고찰 - 미국 증권거래위원회의 보수격차비율 공시제도를 중심으로 -김두환pp. 119-153합병비율 산정에 관한 자본시장법 시행령의 개정 방향 －삼성물산 합병 사례를 중심으로－정형찬pp. 155-200
원문 보기