본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

高麗 散文의 美意識

Aesthetic consciousness of Goryeoprose

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The text, written for aesthetic approach of Korean-Chinese literature in attention of Korean prose literature, considers aesthetic consciousness of Korean prose classifying chronologically:The former period, before Musin-nan and the middle period, before-and after-Musin-nan and the latter part, after Musin-nan. After directly inheriting the style of a writing of the late Silla, the former period was remarkable in Sumryeo-mi, which shown the extravagance focusing on rather a fancy and florid style than contents because of a few factors such as Gwang-jong’s Gwageojedo and Seong-jong’s Sungmun-jeong chaek. Because esthetic formalism was getting extreme resulting from excessive Sumryeo in the former period, Gomun began to attrac tinterest with criticizing negative effect on Byeong-ryeomun. The wind of wish forpre-existing Gomun had had blown stronger and Gomunga started to advent in the history of prose resulting from both the collapse of aristocrat in the former period and the appearance of Sinjinsain in the middle period. In the middle period, Jilbakmi, which plainly conveys the idea of writer, was pursued rather than the florid Sumryeo-mi. For improvement of political and social power, Sinheung-sadaebu in the latter part of Goryeo truly needed to achieve victory in conflict with the Sesin-geosil who was master of Dejang-won and the central authority. Therefore, they strongly advocated Seongli-hak asnewideology. As fine and elaborate logical argument with deeper study on Seongli was setting out, the detailed writing, which analyses fine matter internally and was unprecedented before the latter part, was accomplished.

Abstract

The text, written for aesthetic approach of Korean-Chinese literature in attention of Korean prose literature, considers aesthetic consciousness of Korean prose classifying chronologically:The former period, before Musin-nan and the middle period, before-and after-Musin-nan and the latter part, after Musin-nan. After directly inheriting the style of a writing of the late Silla, the former period was remarkable in Sumryeo-mi, which shown the extravagance focusing on rather a fancy and florid style than contents because of a few factors such as Gwang-jong’s Gwageojedo and Seong-jong’s Sungmun-jeong chaek. Because esthetic formalism was getting extreme resulting from excessive Sumryeo in the former period, Gomun began to attrac tinterest with criticizing negative effect on Byeong-ryeomun. The wind of wish forpre-existing Gomun had had blown stronger and Gomunga started to advent in the history of prose resulting from both the collapse of aristocrat in the former period and the appearance of Sinjinsain in the middle period. In the middle period, Jilbakmi, which plainly conveys the idea of writer, was pursued rather than the florid Sumryeo-mi. For improvement of political and social power, Sinheung-sadaebu in the latter part of Goryeo truly needed to achieve victory in conflict with the Sesin-geosil who was master of Dejang-won and the central authority. Therefore, they strongly advocated Seongli-hak asnewideology. As fine and elaborate logical argument with deeper study on Seongli was setting out, the detailed writing, which analyses fine matter internally and was unprecedented before the latter part, was accomplished.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. "高麗史" (1990), 아세아문화사
  2. 金澤榮, "韶濩堂文集定本" (1978), 아세아문화사
  3. 徐居正, "東文選" (1994), 민족문화간행회
  4. 徐居正, "東人詩話" (1998), 집문당
  5. 徐居正, "四佳集"
  6. 李穀, "稼亭集"
  7. 李奎報, "東國李相國集"
  8. 李穡, "牧隱集"
  9. 李崇仁, "陶隱集"
  10. 李齊賢, "益齋亂藁"
  11. 林椿, "西河集"
  12. 周易, , 대동문화연구원, ~ (1984)
  13. 崔滋, "補閑集" (1972), 아세아문화사
  14. 김근호, "太極, In 조선유학의 개념들" (2003), 예문서원
  15. 琴章泰, "牧隱, In 李穡의 生涯와 思想" (1996), 일조각
  16. 金鐘聲, "韓愈의 書信體 散文 연구", 中國語文論叢, 17 (1999), 중국어문연구회
  17. 박성규, "林椿의 文體 改革, In 고려후기 사대부문학연구" (2003), 고려대출판부
  18. 원주용, "목은 이색 산문 연구" (2008), 한국학술정보
  19. 이기동, "동양 삼국의 주자학" (2003), 성균관대출판부
  20. 이병혁, "韓國科文硏究", 동양학, 16 (1986), 동양학연구소
  21. 이우성, "고려중기의 民族敍事詩, In 한국의 역사인식 上" (1992), 창작과비평사
  22. 이우성, "韓國儒敎에 관한 斷章, In 한국의 역사상" (1983), 창작과비평사
  23. 장원철, "한문산문에서의 미학적 특성, In 한국한문학과 미학" (2003), 태학사
  24. 허권수, "高麗後期 性理學과 漢文學의 交涉樣相", 漢文學報, 13(1), pp.3~19 (2005), 우리한문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)