저작권 증권화와 저작권법 금융의 쟁점

Abstract

Securitization of the copyrighted works is very essential framework for the creator for the betterment of the creativity. Institutionally supplementing the method of providing finance for creators' creation through finance using copyright is a major institutional basis for strengthening the capabilities of the continuously growing Korean content. In view of the nature of copyright, finance and cloud finance in copyright securitization are meaningful as creative finance for different creators in each other's positions and as a means for distribution of created contents and copyrights. Even without asset backed securitization, it is still possible to obtain a loan based on a created work or a person who intends to create a work with copyright as collateral. In such a way that securities are issued to finance a target organization(SPC), and these securities are repaid through the post of purchase receivables purchased by the Special Purpose Company(SPC), the potential buyer of these securities is responsible for receivables in connection with redemption. of the cash flow, and there is no need to keep an eye on the credit of the asset holders. In this respect, there is an advantage in the fact that financing for copyrights is possible by generating securities by grouping them even if the authors are small or the value of individual works is insufficient. Currently, interest rates are expected to rise worldwide, and in the case of Korea, large entertainment companies have a large portfolio they have, and there are cases where they have to procure creative costs. And in the case of music content, considering that the creative cost is quite high, we believe that liquidation can be used. From a legal point of view, it is judged that there are no legal restrictions from the point of view of the Capital Market Act. However, I believe there is a clear benefit to discussing system improvement for the use of copyright under the Copyright Act to make it available for use in the market. For copyright finance, it is necessary to remove or reduce the instability of copyright, and for this, the copyright registration system is important. In some cases, it is difficult to identify who the copyright holder is through meetings with companies and experts that actually carry out copyright finance. Maintenance is required. Even if the current law is still maintained, it is necessary to at least consider reforming the copyright registration system for financial purposes such as mass registration and notification system.