방송저작권 유동화의 활성화에 관한 소고
Some Thoughts on the Invigoration of the Securitization of Copyrights Originating from Broadcasting
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Now, the Korean wave is considered as a global phenomenon. The continuous spread of the Korean Wave to other regions of the world brings the broadcasting company in Korea the way to raise funds by the means of the securitization of copyrights originating from broadcasting (hereinafter “COFB’s”). Since actors, writers, artists, and producers participate in the production of television dramas, the COFB’s are composed of many kinds of copyrights. According to the Asset-Backed Securitization Act(hereinafter “the Act”), a broadcasting company of which credit rating is not good cannot attempt to securitize their COFB’s because it is disqualified as an originator. Thus, the Act should be reformed to give an opportunity of securitization to a small broadcasting company which has highly-valued COFB’s. Only an originator who has a concrete property right can securitize its assets under the Act. A broadcasting company which will produce a drama in the near future cannot issue securities. The Act should have an amended provision to allow a broadcasting company which is in the process of producing a drama to securitize its future COFB’s, In addition, the Act should make the concept of “true sale” clear and let a special purpose company register many securitization plans. Finally, the Act should confine an administer’s duty of oversight regarding the third party’s copyright infringement.
Abstract
Now, the Korean wave is considered as a global phenomenon. The continuous spread of the Korean Wave to other regions of the world brings the broadcasting company in Korea the way to raise funds by the means of the securitization of copyrights originating from broadcasting (hereinafter “COFB’s”). Since actors, writers, artists, and producers participate in the production of television dramas, the COFB’s are composed of many kinds of copyrights. According to the Asset-Backed Securitization Act(hereinafter “the Act”), a broadcasting company of which credit rating is not good cannot attempt to securitize their COFB’s because it is disqualified as an originator. Thus, the Act should be reformed to give an opportunity of securitization to a small broadcasting company which has highly-valued COFB’s. Only an originator who has a concrete property right can securitize its assets under the Act. A broadcasting company which will produce a drama in the near future cannot issue securities. The Act should have an amended provision to allow a broadcasting company which is in the process of producing a drama to securitize its future COFB’s, In addition, the Act should make the concept of “true sale” clear and let a special purpose company register many securitization plans. Finally, the Act should confine an administer’s duty of oversight regarding the third party’s copyright infringement.
참고문헌 (36)
- 금융감독원, "자산유동화 실무 안내" (2012), 금융감독원
- 기술금융 활성화 방안-기술금융상품을 중심으로-, "김광희", 중소기업연구원, ~, pp.기본연구08-16 (2008)
- 기술유동화증권제도의 현황과 운영 방안, "김형태", 한국증권연구원, ~ (2005)
- 류종현, "방송과 저작권-뉴스⋅영화⋅드라마⋅생방송⋅광고" (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 뉴스저작물의 저작권, "지성우", 한국언론재단, ~, pp.보고서 2005-07 (2005)
- みずほ信託銀行, "債権流動化の法務と実務" (2005), 金融財政事情研究会
- 桑木小恵子, "証券化 ― 新たな使命とリスクの検証" (2012), 金融財政事情研究会
- 新井誠, "信託法 第2版" (2006), 有斐閣
- (社)日本不動産鑑定協会調査研究委員会鑑定評価理論研究会, "知的財産権の適正評価システム: 基本的考え方から実例分析まで" (2008), 住宅新報社
- 林繁樹, "証券化ビジネスガイドブック―実務とWBSへの展開" (2010), 中央経済社
- 土井宏文, "著作権ビジネス構造分析" (2012), コンテンツシティ出版事業部
- 海外番組販売検討委員会, "テレビ番組の海外販売ガイドブック- 現状、ノウハウ、新しい展開-" (2012), 映像産業振興機構
- 강희철, "자산유동화법에 의한 자산유동화의 한계와 이를 극복하기 위한 수단으로서의 비정형유동화에 관한 고찰", 증권법연구, 4(1), pp.177~238 (2003), 한국증권법학회
- 김두환, "知的財産權의 證券化에 대한 小考", 외법논집, (31), pp.593~620 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김병일, "자산유동화의 신용보강장치에 대한 과세문제", 세무와회계저널, 7(4), pp.201~236 (2006), 한국세무학회
- 김종보, "지적재산권 강화경향과 정보공유와의 관계에 대한 고찰-헌법이념상 저작권개념을 중심으로-", 법학연구, 46(1), pp.89~122 (2005), 부산대학교
- 남형두, "저작권의 역사와 철학", 산업재산권, (26), pp.245~306 (2008), 한국지식재산학회
- 박성호, "지적재산권에 관한 헌법 제22조 제2항의 의미와 내용", 법학논총, 24(1), pp.95~118 (2007), 법학연구소
- 박준석, "무체재산권⋅지적소유권⋅지적재산권⋅지식재산권 - 한국 지재법 총칭(總稱) 변화의 연혁적⋅실증적 비판 -", 서울대학교 법학, 53(4), pp.109~160 (2012), 법학연구소
- 배대헌, "현행 저작권법상 저작인격권의 법리에 관한 검토", 산업재산권, (21), pp.147~192 (2006), 한국지식재산학회
- 유신일, "중국에서의 한류", CHINA연구, (14), pp.333~354 (2013), 중국연구소
- 윤부찬, "자산유동화와 진정한 매매의 법리", 비교사법, 14(3), pp.1041~1078 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 윤종수, "저작인접권에 관한 고찰 -저작인접권의 본질론적 검토와 미디어환경의 변화에 따른 쟁점을 중심으로-", 사법논집, 45, pp.591~654 (2007), 법원도서관
- 윤창술, "자산유동화에 있어서 법적인 제반문제에 대한 고찰", 법학논총, 35(2), pp.343~375 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이규호, "저작권 담보 활성화 방안에 관한 고찰", 정보법학, 15(1), pp.101~133 (2011), 한국정보법학회
- 진홍기, "프로젝트 파이낸스와 구조화금융 - 프로젝트 파이낸스(PF)의 본질과 그 구조화 -", 비교사법, 19(2), pp.459~498 (2012), 한국비교사법학회[DOI]
- 최병규, "중소기업 지적재산권 담보가치평가에 관한 연구", 산업재산권, (12), pp.27~54 (2002), 한국지식재산학회
- 한철, "벤처기업의 자금조달을 위한 법적 과제", 상사법연구, 20(4), pp.167~212, 한국상사법학회
- 홍석경, "세계화 과정 속 디지털 문화 현상으로서의 한류: 프랑스에서 바라본 한류의 세계적 소비에 대한 이론적 고찰", 언론정보연구, 50(1), pp.157~192 (2013), 언론정보연구소
- 황인석, "자산유동화제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 고찰", 고려법학, (44), pp.233~262 (2005), 고려대학교
- 小林卓泰, "知的財産の證券化⋅流動化取引に關する法的⋅實務的諸問題(2)", NBL 通卷, (758), pp.65~73 (2003), 商事法務
- 小林卓泰, "知的財産の證券化⋅流動化取引に關する法的⋅實務的諸問題(4)", NBL 通卷, (761), pp.66~70 (2003), 商事法務
- 小林卓泰, "知的財産の證券化⋅流動化取引に關する法的⋅實務的諸問題(6)", NBL 通卷, (764), pp.55~60 (2003), 商事法務
- Claire A. Hill, "Securitization : A Low-Cost Sweetener for Lemons", Washington University Law Quarterly, 74 (1996)
- Lawrence A. Jegen, III, "Developments in Indiana Taxation", Indiana Law Review, 35 (2002)
- Oxford Economics, "The Economic Contribution of the Film and Television Industries in South Korea" (2012)