記事의 양식적 특성과 작품 세계
Formal Characteristics and Work Idea of Gi·sa(記事)
1
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Gi·sa is a descriptive form recording facts and events. Academic world has not paid attention to it as a subject worth continual research because its quantity is relatively small, content scope is too wide and genre has complex attribute. This paper, considering such conditions, examined the definitions of Gi·sa then its formal characteristics mainly from undisclosed works. Followings are several facts revealed by this study. Gi·sa is a descriptive form a writer use when he wants find out the fact of an event closely and hand down it to posterity. So, its main elements are the time and place the event happened and the identities of major agents and informants. The focus of description is to clarify the right and wrong of event, rather than the teachings of event or estimation on the concerned persons. The contents of Gi·sa are events or anecdotes which are not adequate for biography(傳) and Ya·dam(野談). Some Gi·sa(es) would describe the life big experiences of a man. They expressed well the joys and sorrows of life with fact description only, without literary description or embellishments. It can be said the literary value of Gi·sa consists in such fact.
Abstract
Gi·sa is a descriptive form recording facts and events. Academic world has not paid attention to it as a subject worth continual research because its quantity is relatively small, content scope is too wide and genre has complex attribute. This paper, considering such conditions, examined the definitions of Gi·sa then its formal characteristics mainly from undisclosed works. Followings are several facts revealed by this study. Gi·sa is a descriptive form a writer use when he wants find out the fact of an event closely and hand down it to posterity. So, its main elements are the time and place the event happened and the identities of major agents and informants. The focus of description is to clarify the right and wrong of event, rather than the teachings of event or estimation on the concerned persons. The contents of Gi·sa are events or anecdotes which are not adequate for biography(傳) and Ya·dam(野談). Some Gi·sa(es) would describe the life big experiences of a man. They expressed well the joys and sorrows of life with fact description only, without literary description or embellishments. It can be said the literary value of Gi·sa consists in such fact.
참고문헌 (27)
- 金構, "觀復齋遺稿" (2007)
- 金履安, "三山齋集" (1999)
- 金楺, "儉齋集" (2007)
- 金振邦, "文章體裁辭典" (1986), 東北師範大學出版社
- 金平默, "重菴集" (2003)
- 徐師曾, "文體明辯" (1984), 보경문화사
- 吳曾祺, "涵芬樓古今文鈔簡篇", 臺灣商務印書館
- 兪漢雋, "自著" (2000)
- 尹愭, "無名子集" (2000)
- 張榮輝, "中國文體通論", 高職叢書出版社
- 안동대학교 퇴계학연구소, "退溪學資料叢書" (2003)
- 김혜숙, "傳ㆍ書事ㆍ野談의 대비적 고찰 in: 새터강한영교수고희기념논문집" (1983), 아세아문화사
- 김혜숙, "傳ㆍ書事ㆍ野談의 대비적 고찰 in:한국한문학의 이론 -산문" (2007), 보고사
- 손혜리, "연경재 성해응 산문의 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 심노숭, "눈물이란 무엇인가" (2001), 태학사
- 안병걸, "왕달애비이야기 : 패가망신을 염려하면서" (2009), 한국고전번역원 고전칼럼
- 유득공, "누가 알아주랴" (2005), 태학사
- 이가원, "석북문학연구", 翰文學硏究 (1969), 탐구당
- 이경미, "연경재 성해응 기사의 소설적 국면", 동방한문학, 16 (1999), 동방한문학회
- 이경미, "연경재 성해응의 記事 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 이희목, "이건창 문학 연구" (2005), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
- 임완혁, "구연전통과 서사" (2008), 태학사
- 정환국, "병자호란시 江華관련 실기류 및 몽유록에 대한 일 고찰", 한국한문학연구, 23 (1999), 한국한문학회
- 鄭煥局, "조선후기 人物記事의 전개와 그 성격", 한국한문학연구, 29, pp.291~320 (2002), 한국한문학회
- 조창록, "記事의 특징과 전개 in: 한국한문학의 이론-산문" (2007), 보고사
- 조창록, "조선후기 ‘記事’ 연구", 석사, pp.1993
- 진재교, "알아주지 않은 삶" (2005), 태학사
