漢文文類 ‘論’의 立論形式

Abstract

This study is for representing three title styles of verbal battle, refutation style and the analects of the catechetic method of setting up a theory which is the representative setting up a theory style of chinese prose literature's theory made from all philosophers and scholars such as Mukja(墨子), Janga(莊子), Hanbija(韓非子) and Mencius(孟子). As the result, three title style of setting up a theory keeps three style of Bon(本)-Won(原)-Young(用) represented as setting up a theory by Mukja(墨子) and we can clearly see that there is setting up a meaning at the stage of Bon(本) and breaking logic style through Saloo(事類) at the stage of Won(原). But the style of setting up a theory of the debate and refutation style is against the theme for which Nonja(老子) was to set up a theory and is consisted of the simple structure with refutation through illustration. Therefore there was no Bon(本)-Won(原)-Yong(用) of three title style and it shows that it is exactly the same as refutation style of Mencius(孟子). Finally setting up a theory style through the analects style of catechetic method shows the point of an argument of Lao-tzu with the analects of catechetic method and is the same as making a theory style of Hanbija with penetrating time through circumstantial evidence as its detailed style.