본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본의 유동집합양도담보

The Floating Lien of a Collective Receivable in Japan

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Abstract

In Japan, the floating lien of a collective receivable has been used by men of affairs for a long time. It is mainly used in financial affairs, for example, factoring, lease, selling on credit, etc. It is connected with what is called a principle of security-offering that occupies a important base in Japanese civil transaction. It is classified with different types on the basis of affair forms. Its effectiveness is generally approved by many scholars and judges. But it is not always effective. That is to say, a possibility that the receivable will happen is sure to exist to approve its effectiveness to some degree. Some doctrines can be indicated on the basis of the degree of the possibility. A certain scholars say that the possibility is not needed with some legal grounds. And the receivable should be specified by a transferor to transfer effectively. Requisites ofthe specification are a kind of receivables, a period of receivables, a limit of receivables and obligors of transferor. And the rule, what is calledpublic order and costumecan be offended, if a transferor and his another obligees are infringed their interest on account of a unfair settlement of security. In conclusion, its effectiveness, the specification and the rule are closely connected with one another. Moreover, A special requisite is needed to claim a legal transference to obligors of transferor and a third party. That is the very notice to obligors of transferor or consent from them, and many scholars are discussing this requisite should be loosen.By the way, as a matter of fact, many Japanese judicial precedents about this subject exist, because this security method has been used for fifty years in Japan. These judicial precedents must be good materials to study it, because they are concerned with its effectiveness, the specification, the rule and the requisite. Most of all, I hope that this thesis help you understand it.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. "銀行取引と債權擔保" (1977), 經濟法令硏究會
  2. "ファクタリソグ取引の法理論" (1979), キンザイ
  3. "有擔保原則の一斑", (31) (1995)
  4. 我妻榮, "近代私法における債權の優越的地位" (1953), 有斐閣
  5. "新訂擔保物權法" (1968), 岩波書店
  6. "讓渡擔保〔經營法學全集9企業擔保〕" (1966), ダイヤモンド社
  7. "債權非典型擔保", (31) (1995)
  8. "註釋民法11" (1960)
  9. "財産管理權論序說" (1954)
  10. "新訂擔保物權法" (1983), 岩波書店
  11. "繼續的保證の硏究" (1952), 有斐閣
  12. "ドイツの判例における良俗違反" (1995), 日本評論社
  13. "Eigentumsvorbehalt und Sicherungsbertragung" (1976)
  14. "Kreditsicherungsrecht"
  15. "Allgemeiner Teil des BGB" (1985)
  16. "債權讓渡에 관한 硏究" (1985), 서울대학교 박사학위논문
  17. "將來債權의 讓渡", 통(73) (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)