소비자법 민법전편입의 이론적 근거와 방향성 - 실질적 사적자치론 · 소비자계약론의 관점에서 -
Theoretical Basis and the Direction for the Incorporation of Consumer law into Civil Code - In the Viewpoint of Substantial Private Autonomy Theory and Consumer Contract Theory -
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The application of Civil Code to consumer transactions means that civil code will regulate the type of transaction (BtoC) the modern civil code did not envisage. However, it is a type of transaction which the civil code as a general private law should have included. If so, it can be justified that the legal representation of consumer transactions, "consumer contract" may be governed by the Civil Code. The issue is whether or not the Civil Code can embrace individual consumer protection laws which have developed outside the scope of the civil law. Because the consumer protection law is for the purpose of the consumer protection, it would be possible to conflict with the idea of the civil law which has its origin in the private autonomy. On the assumption that the structural characteristics of consumers and consumer contracts induce the necessity of the consumer protection, this article tries to justify the theoretical basis for the incorporation of the consumer contract law into the Civill Code through the theory of substantial private autonomy. In short, as long as the private autonomy of the civil law is understood the substantial private autonomy, it can be justified that the legal rules to accomplish the substantial private autonomy of the consumers is incorporated into the Civil Code. In the meanwhile, regarding what principle or rule will be necessary to accomplish the substantial private autonomy, this article will comparatively study the contract law principles between in consumer contract law and in civil law. Also, through the comparison study, it will try to induce the legal principle of the consumer contract which our legal system doesn't have. Legal principles or rules for regulating the process of and the content of the consumer contract play a role in protecting the consumers (or parties) in the contract process by using the civil law principle or by influencing the doctrine or the application of civil law. What makes these two parties connect is the very theory of substantial private autonomy. In sum civil lfound that the legal principles or rules for regulating the process of and the content of the consumer contract harmonizes with the theory of the civil law within the limits for helping to realize the substantial private autonomy by self-determination of consumers. The theoretical basis and the direction for the purpose of the incorporation of the consumer law into the Civil Code should be understood in this way.
Abstract
The application of Civil Code to consumer transactions means that civil code will regulate the type of transaction (BtoC) the modern civil code did not envisage. However, it is a type of transaction which the civil code as a general private law should have included. If so, it can be justified that the legal representation of consumer transactions, "consumer contract" may be governed by the Civil Code. The issue is whether or not the Civil Code can embrace individual consumer protection laws which have developed outside the scope of the civil law. Because the consumer protection law is for the purpose of the consumer protection, it would be possible to conflict with the idea of the civil law which has its origin in the private autonomy. On the assumption that the structural characteristics of consumers and consumer contracts induce the necessity of the consumer protection, this article tries to justify the theoretical basis for the incorporation of the consumer contract law into the Civill Code through the theory of substantial private autonomy. In short, as long as the private autonomy of the civil law is understood the substantial private autonomy, it can be justified that the legal rules to accomplish the substantial private autonomy of the consumers is incorporated into the Civil Code. In the meanwhile, regarding what principle or rule will be necessary to accomplish the substantial private autonomy, this article will comparatively study the contract law principles between in consumer contract law and in civil law. Also, through the comparison study, it will try to induce the legal principle of the consumer contract which our legal system doesn't have. Legal principles or rules for regulating the process of and the content of the consumer contract play a role in protecting the consumers (or parties) in the contract process by using the civil law principle or by influencing the doctrine or the application of civil law. What makes these two parties connect is the very theory of substantial private autonomy. In sum civil lfound that the legal principles or rules for regulating the process of and the content of the consumer contract harmonizes with the theory of the civil law within the limits for helping to realize the substantial private autonomy by self-determination of consumers. The theoretical basis and the direction for the purpose of the incorporation of the consumer law into the Civil Code should be understood in this way.
참고문헌 (30)
- 고상룡, (2003), 법문사
- 곽윤직, (2002), 박영사
- 김대정, "계약법" (2008), 법학전문대학원협의회
- 김준호, (2010), 법문사
- 김형배, (2010), 신조사
- 송덕수, (2010), 박영사
- 이영준, (2007), 박영사
- 이은영, (2000), 박영사
- 지원림, (2010), 홍문사
- 고형석, "소비자취소권에 관한 연구 - 일본 소비자계약법을 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (41), pp.203~230 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김도년, "소비자보호철회권의 민사법상 지위", 박사, 법학, pp.2009
- 김상중, "계약체결 이전 단계의 정보제공의무 - 외국 입법례와 비교에 의한 규정 신설의 제안을 중심으로 -", 고려법학, (56), pp.1~45 (2010), 법학연구원
- 김진우, "소비자계약법의 민법전으로의 통합을 위한 시론적 고찰", 법학논총, 23, pp.165~197 (2010), 법학연구소
- 박영복, "契約締結前段階의 法規範化", 외법논집, 10 (2001)
- 백경일, "소비자보호법의 민법전 내 편입문제에 관한 비판적 고찰 - 소비자사법론, 상황관련적 소비자보호관, 실질적 사적자치 개념 등의 모순성에 대하여 -", 재산법연구, 26(2), pp.271~312 (2009), 한국재산법학회
- 백경일, "소비자보호법의 존재의의 및 효용성에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 소비자보호법의 규범적 정당성과 경제적 실효성에 대한 분석 -", 법학연구, 49(2), pp.247~292 (2009), 법학연구소
- 서희석, "일본 민법개정시안에 있어서 소비자법의 위치", 재산법연구, 26(2), pp.349~410 (2009), 한국재산법학회
- 서희석, "일본 소비자계약법 5년의 성과와 평가", 민사법학, (39-1), pp.85~136 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 서희석, "소비자사법의 일반화의 가능성 - 일본에서의 논의를 참고하여 -", 법학연구, 51(3), pp.91~133 (2010), 법학연구소
- 양창수, "계속적 보증에서의 보증인의 책임제한 -대법원 1984년 10월 10일 판결 84다카453사건-", 고시연구, 27(12) (2000)
- 이병준, "일반사법 체계 내에서의 소비자계약법의 지위", 강원법학, 28, pp.61~88 (2009), 비교법학연구소
- 이병준, "민법에서의 소비자의 지위와 소비자특별법의 민법전에의 통합", 민사법학, (39-1), pp.205~244 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 이병준, "독일민법상 소비자계약에서의 철회권과 반환권", 외법논집, (18), pp.217~248 (2005), 법학연구소
- 伊藤進, "消費者のための民法入門" (1977), 有斐閣
- 内田貴, (2007), 東京大学出版会
- 大村敦志, (2007), 有斐閣
- 日本弁護士連合会, "消費者法講義" (2004), 日本評論社
- 谷本圭子, "民法上の人と消費者, 民法学の課題と展望(石田喜久夫先生古稀記念)" (2000), 成文堂
- 松本恒雄, "消費者私法ないし消費者契約という観念は可能かつ必要か. in: 講座・現代契約と現代債権の展望・第六巻新種および特殊の契約" (1991), 日本評論社
- 内田貴, "契約プロセスと法. in: 社会科学の方法Ⅵ", ~ (1993)
