시장경쟁질서와 기업의 재무정책
Market Competition Order and Financial Policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문에서는 1981년부터 2013년까지 거래소에 상장된 비-금융기업을 대상으로 시장경쟁질서가 기업의 재무정책에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 기존 제시된 이론적 모형을 제시하고 실증적 결과를 제시한다. 이론적 모형에서 현금보유정책은 상품시장의 경쟁 강도에 의하여 영향을 받으며 특히 경쟁강도가 높고 재무제약이 존재하는 기업일수록 현금을 증가시킨다는 예측을 제시하고 있다. 이러한 이론적 모형 예측 결과가 국내 기업에서도 실증적으로 뒷받침 되는지를 거래소시장에 상장된 비-금융기업을 대상으로 실증 검증한다. 실증 검증 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째 경쟁기업의 수(N), 허핀덜지수(HHI), 러너지수(PCM) 및 EPCM 등의 다양한 경쟁강도를 측정하는 대리변수를 사용하여 실증 분석한 결과 경쟁강도가 높을수록 현금보유를 늘리기 보다는 오히려 줄이려는 경향을 보였으며 이러한 결과는 이론적 모형에서 예측한 결과와 일치하지 않고 있다. 따라서 국내 비-금융기업들의 현금보유정책이 경쟁정도에 따라 외국기업과는 다른 독특한 특성을 가지고 있음을 알 수 있다. 둘째, 재무제약이 기업의 현금보유정책에 어떻게 영향을 주는지를 파악한 결과 전기 재무제약이 존재할수록 미래 현금보유를 늘리려는 경향을 보였으며 이러한 결과는 모형에서 예측한 결과를 뒷받침해 주고 있다. 셋째, 경쟁강도가 높고 재무제약인 기업이 현금보유정책에 어떻게 영향을 주는지를 검증한 결과 현금보유와 재무제약을 가진 높은 시장경쟁을 가진 기업이 보다 더 많은 현금을 보유하는 경향이 나타났다. 이러한 결과도 이론적 모형에서 제시한 결과를 뒷받침해 주고 있다. 본 실증 분석 결과는 기업의 재무정책에 대한 기존 제시된 결정요인들 이외에 중요한 요인들이 존재함을 보여주는 것이며 이러한 요인들은 시장과의 관계에 매우 중요한 시사점을 제시하고 있다.
Abstract
This study investigates whether market competition order affects corporate financial policy and also the interaction between market competition and financial constraint by using Korean manufacturing firms listed in KOSPI market over 1981 to 2013. Based on the previous dynamic cash model from the theoretical background, the industry equilibrium provides the evidence of the effect of market competition on financial cash or liquidity policy. This model also finds that financial constrained firms use cash reserve withstand liquidity shortfalls during recession economy condition. This fact implies that market competition order triggers two contrasting effects. First, it increases the option value to remain active in the market, which means reinforcing the precautionary motive for holding cash or liquidity asset. Second, it induces the firms to reduce leverage and interest payments on debt. Thus lower debt payments require a smaller amount of cash or liquidity reserve, other things being equal. Although the overall effect is potentially ambiguous, under realistic conditions, cash increases with competition. Therefore, this prior study suggests that competition can explain the increase in cash holdings and exacerbate the negative relation between leverage and cash in this paper. In summarizing all of results from theoretical and empirical predictions, we find that product market competition order affects positively the financial policy, such as the level of cash holdings or liquidity policy, and also firms with higher financial constraint and higher product market competition order tends to increase the cash holdings or liquidity policy. Based on this prediction from model, we confirm that the results predicted from model support the evidence from real data using sample of non-financial firms listed in KOSPI market. To find more strong results, we use several various proxies for product market competition like number of competitive firm in a same industry, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), and excess of price-cost margin (EPCM), and financial constraint like SA Index, and then confirm the predicted result from the model. Also we implement various estimation methods, which are OLS and fixed effect model to find the evidence predicted in the model. We find in empirical test as follows: First, we show that order of product market competition by using number of firms, HHI, and EPCM affect negatively the cash holdings or liquidity policy, which are all financial policies. This empirical result is inconsistent with predicted result from the model. This evidence implies that Korean non-financial firms tend to decrease the cash holdings as the product market competition increases. Thus we guess that there is a unique characteristic of Korean non-financial firms in terms of the product market competition and the cash holdings. Second, we find that the intensity of product market competition increases with the intensity of financial constraints, which is consistent with the predicted result from the model. Third, we also find that the effect of intensity of market competition on cash holdings increases with the intensity of financing constraints, which is consistent with the predicted result from the model. We conclude that the empirical evidences found in this paper are robust regardless of several competition measures and estimation methods. These findings suggest that the intensity of product market competition and financial constraint play a key role in decision making of firm’s financial policies such as cash holdings policy or liquidity policy in terms of firm operation.
참고문헌 (31)
- 기업현금보유 분석: 2000년대 상장 및 비상장기업을대상으로, "김윤경", 한국경제연구원, ~, pp.연구: 14-09 (2015)
- 임병균, "기업의 현금보유전략이 투자와 상품시장에 미치는 효과: 경쟁기업으로부터 증거", 金融工學硏究, 12(4), pp.109~133 (2013), 한국금융공학회
- Aghion, P., "Competition and Innovation: An inverted U Relationship", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, pp.701~728 (2005)
- Almeida, H., "The Cash-Flow Sensitivity of Cash", Journal of Finance, 59, pp.1777~1804 (2004)
- Bates, T., "Why Do U.S. Firms Hold so Much More Cash Than They Used To?", Journal of Finance, 64, pp.1985~2021 (2009)
- Bolton, P., "A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in financial contracting", American Economic Review, 80, pp.93~106 (1990)
- Campello, M., "Capital Structure and Product Market Interactions: Evidence from the Business Cycles", Journal of Financial Economics, 68, pp.353~378 (2003)
- Cleary, S., "The relationship between firm investment and financial status", Journal of Finance, 54(1), pp.673~692 (1999)
- Chu, Y., "Optimal Capital Structure, Bargaining, and the Supplier Market Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 106, pp.411~426 (2012)
- Datta, S., "Managerial stock ownership and the maturity structure of debt", Journal of Finance, 60, pp.2333~2350 (2005)
- Cash and Competition, "Della Seta, M.", ~ (2013)
- Fresard, L., "Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings", Journal of Finance, 64, pp.1097~1122 (2010)
- Competitive Pressure and Corporate Policies, "Fresard, L.", ~ (2013)
- Erickson, T., "Measurement Error and the Relationship Between Investment and q", Journal of Political Economy, 108, pp.1027~1057 (2000)
- Fazzari S., "Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment", Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp.141~195 (1988)
- Gaspar, J., "Idiosyncratic Volatility and Product Market Competition", Journal of Business, 79, pp.3125~3152 (2006)
- Gilchrist, S., "Evidence on the Role of Cash Flow for Investment", Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, pp.541~572 (1995)
- Hadlock, J.C., "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints:Moving Beyond the KZ Index", Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), pp.1909~1940 (2010)
- Han, S., "Corporate Precautionary Cash Savings", Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, pp.43~57 (2007)
- Kovenock, D., "Capital Structure and Product Market Behavior:An Examination of Plant Exit and Investment Decisions", Review of Financial Studies, 10, pp.767~803 (1997)
- Strategic Cash Holdings and R&D Competition:Theory and Evidence, "Lyandres, E.", ~ (2013)
- Lambrecht, B., "The Impact of Debt Financing on Entry and Exit in a Duopoly", Review of Financial Studies, 14, pp.765~804 (2001)
- Lerner, A., "The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power", Review of Economic Studies, 1, pp.157~175 (1934)
- Lindenberg, E., "Tobin’s q Ratio and Industrial Organization", Journal of Business, 54, pp.1~32 (1981)
- Industry Competition, Winner’s Advantage and Cash Holdings, "Ma, L.", ~ (2013)
- Competition, Cash holdings, and Financing Decisions, "Morellec, E.", ~ (2014)
- Morellec, E., "Financing and Takeovers", Journal of Financial Economics, 87, pp.556~581 (2008)
- Nickell, S., "Competition and Corporate Performance", Journal of Political Economy, 104, pp.724~746 (1996)
- Opler, T., "The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings", Journal of Financial Economics, 51, pp.219~244 (1999)
- Whited, T., "Financial Constraints Risk", Review of Financial Studies, 19, pp.531~559 (2006)
- Whited, T., "Debt, Liquidity Constraints and Corporate Investment: Evidence from Panel Data", Journal of Finance, 47, pp.425~460 (1992)
