예비초등교사의 자유 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 추론 복잡성 분석
Analysis on the Complexity of Scientific Reasoning during Pre-service Elementary School Teachers’ Open-Inquiry Activities
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to analyze the complexity of scientific reasoning during open inquiry activities of pre-service elementary school teachers. In this study, 6 pre-service elementary teachers who participated in open-inquiry activities were selected. The data of scientific reasoning during their inquiry process was collected from the video recording of reporting about inquiry process and results, their reports and researcher's notetaking. CSRI Matrix (Dolan & Grady, 2010) was used to analyze the complexity of participants' scientific reasoning. The result showed that the degree of the complexity of their scientific reasoning varied in participants. Particularly the low degree of the complexity of scientific reasoning presented in posing preliminary hypotheses, providing suggestions for future research, communicating and defending finding. Also, The more pre-service teachers' epistemology of inquiry are similar to that of scientists, the more complex scientific reasoning represents. This results suggest that teachers should impress on students the importance of doing the precedent study and providing suggestions for future research, and provide a place for communicating and defending findings.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the complexity of scientific reasoning during open inquiry activities of pre-service elementary school teachers. In this study, 6 pre-service elementary teachers who participated in open-inquiry activities were selected. The data of scientific reasoning during their inquiry process was collected from the video recording of reporting about inquiry process and results, their reports and researcher's notetaking. CSRI Matrix (Dolan & Grady, 2010) was used to analyze the complexity of participants' scientific reasoning. The result showed that the degree of the complexity of their scientific reasoning varied in participants. Particularly the low degree of the complexity of scientific reasoning presented in posing preliminary hypotheses, providing suggestions for future research, communicating and defending finding. Also, The more pre-service teachers' epistemology of inquiry are similar to that of scientists, the more complex scientific reasoning represents. This results suggest that teachers should impress on students the importance of doing the precedent study and providing suggestions for future research, and provide a place for communicating and defending findings.
참고문헌 (76)
- 권용주, "수증기 응결에 관한 초등학생들의 가설 생성에서 귀추의 역할과 과정", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(4), pp.250~257 (2003)
- 권용주, "예비 과학교사들의 가설 창안 과정에 대한 탐색적 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 15(1), pp.116~125 (2000)
- 김선자, "변인통제 문제해결 과정에서 나타난 초등학생의 실험설계 및 증거제시 특성", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(2), pp.111~121 (2005)
- 김숙경, "초등학생의 자유 탐구 활동 보고서의 평가 준거 개발 및 적용", 초등과학교육, 29(1), pp.69~85 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김재우, "중학교 1학년 학생들의 자유 탐구보고서에 나타난 변인의 유형", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(3), pp.297~301 (1998)
- 김찬종, "초등 과학과 포트폴리오의 채점기준 개발과 신뢰도 검증", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), pp.176~189 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- 김희경, "과학 실험 목적에 대한 중학생의 인식 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), pp.254~264 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 박정희, "탐구 학습에 관한 중등 과학 교사들의 인식", 한국지구과학회지, 25(8), pp.731~738 (2004), 한국지구과학회
- 박종원, "학생의 과학적 탐구문제의 제안과정과 특성 분석", 새물리, 50(4), pp.203~211 (2005), 한국물리학회
- 신현화, "초등학교 과학과 자유탐구 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(3), pp.262~276 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 윤초희, "과학영재의 과학탐구능력 관련 변인에 대한 경로분석: 숙달목표, 자기효능감, 자기조절전략 및탐구수업을 중심으로", 교육심리연구, 20(2), pp.321~339 (2006), 한국교육심리학회
- 임성만, "초등 예비교사들이 자유 탐구 활동 중에 겪은 어려움 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(2), pp.291~303 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 전영석, "과학 자유탐구를 지도할 때 발생하는 어려움", 한국초등교육, 20(1), pp.105~115 (2009), 초등교육연구원
- 권용주, "과학적 가설의 생성력 향상을 위한 삼원귀추모형의 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(5), pp.595~602 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 조현준, "초등학교 과학 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), pp.901~921 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 주정은, "관찰에 의한 분류하기 탐구 능력 평가 준거 개발", 초등과학교육, 26(4), pp.407~417 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 진순희, "과학 탐구에 대한 초등 교사들의 지도 경험", 초등과학교육, 26(2), pp.181~191 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 황성원, "전기와 자기에 대한 중학생들의 개방적 탐구에서 과제 유형에 따른 탐구 수행 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 21(2), pp.255~263 (2001)
- 황현정, "초등 예비 교사들의 자유 탐구 수행 능력 분석", 초등과학교육, 28(4), pp.404~414 (2009), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural Natural", Science Education, 82(4), pp.417~436 (1998)
- Abrahams, I., "Does practical work really work? A Study of the effectieness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science", International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), pp.1945~1969 (2008)
- Bereiter, C., "Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse", Educational Psychology, 29, pp.3~12 (1994)
- Blanchette, I., "How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity", Memory and Cognition, 29, pp.730~735 (2000)
- Buffler, A., "The relationship between students' views fo the nature of science and their views of the nature of scientific measurement", International Jouranl fo Science Education, 31(9), pp.1137~1156 (2009)
- Bylee, R. W., "Teaching cience as inquiry, in Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science", pp.20~46 (2000), American Association for the Advancement of Science
- Chamberlain, T. C., "The method of multiple working hypothesis", Science, 15(92), pp.754~759 (1890)
- Chinn, C. A., "The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction", Review of Educational Research, 63(1), pp.1~49 (1993)
- Chinn, C. A., "Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data", Cognition and Instruction, 19(3), pp.323~393 (2001)
- Chinn, C. A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks", Science Education, 86, pp.175~218 (2002)
- Cohen, L., "Research methods in education(5th Ed.)" (2000), Routledge Falmer
- Colburn, A., "An inquiry primer", Science Scope, 23(6), pp.42~44 (2000)
- Darden, L., "Theory change in science: Strategies from Mendelian genetics" (1991), Oxford University Press
- DeBoer, G. E., "Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools, in Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education", pp.17~35 (2006), Springer
- Dolan, E., "Recognizing students' scientific reasoning: A tool for categorizing complexity of reasoning during teaching by inquiry", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, pp.31~55 (2010)
- Driver, R., "Establing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84, pp.287~312 (2000)
- Dunbar, K, "How Scientists Build Models: InVivo Science as a Window on the Scientific Mind, in Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery", pp.89~98 (1999), Plenum Press
- Finley, F. N., "Considering the scientific method of inquiry, in Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science", pp.47~62 (2000), American Association for the Advancement of Science
- Fletcher, I., "When coders are reliable: The application of three measures to assess inter-rater reliability", agreement with doctor-patient communication data coded with the VR-CoDES, 2011, pp.82, 341~345
- Germann, P. J., "Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), pp.475~499 (1996)
- Giere, R. N., "Explaining science: A cognitive approach" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Harwood, W. S., "An activity models for scientific inquiry", The Science Teacher, 71(1), pp.44~46 (2004)
- Harwood, W. S., "A new model for inquiry: Is the scientific method dead", Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(7), pp.29~33 (2004)
- Harwood, W. S., "Putting the puzzle together: Scientists' metaphors for scientific inquiry", Science Educator, 14(1), pp.25~30 (2005)
- Holyoak, K. J., "Analogy, in The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning", pp.117~142 (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Jonathan, A. F., "Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), pp.86~95 (2004)
- Josephson, J. R., "Abductive inference: Computaion, philosophy, technology" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Klahr, D., "Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study", Cognitive Psychology, 25, pp.111~146 (1993)
- Klayman, J., "Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing", Psychological Review, 94(2), pp.211~228 (1987)
- Krajcik, J., "Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students", The Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3&4), pp.313~350 (1998)
- Kuhn, D., "The development of scientific thinking Skills" (1988), Academic Press
- Kyza, E. A., "Middle-school students' reasoning about alternative hypotheses in a scaffolded, software-based inquiry investigation", Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), pp.277~311 (2009)
- Latour, B., "Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society" (1987), Open University Press
- Lawson, A. E., "Science teaching and the development of thinking", pp.11~12 (1995), Wadsworth
- Lawson, A. E., "What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), pp.716~740 (2004)
- Limón, M., "On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal", Learning and Instruction, 11, pp.357~380 (2001)
- Lustick, D., "The failure of inquiry: Preparing science teachers with an authentic investigation", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, pp.583~604 (2009)
- Magnani, L., "Model-based and manipulative abduction in science", Foundation of Science, 9, pp.219~247 (2004)
- Magnani, L., "Abduction and chance discovery in science", International Journal of Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems, 11, pp.273~279 (2007)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- National Research Council, "Inquiry and national science education standards" (2000), National Academy Press
- Reiff, R., "A scientific method based upon research scientists’ conception of scientific inquiry", In Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, pp.546~556 (2002)
- Robinson, W. R., "The inquiry wheel, an alternative to the scientific method", Journal of Chemical Education, 81(6), pp.791~792 (2004)
- Roth, W. M., "How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), pp.25~48 (1998)
- Roth, W., "An investigation of problem framing and solving in grade 8 open-inquiry science program", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), pp.165~204 (1993)
- Schauble, L., "Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom", The Journal of the Learning Science, 4, pp.131~166 (1995)
- Schauble, L., "Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific reasoning", The Journal of The Learning Science, 1(2), pp.201~238 (1991)
- 크라직, "Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform", EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 35(3), pp.165~178, LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC
- Sloman, S. A., "The problem of Induction, in The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning", pp.95~116 (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Taylor, C., "Some educational implications of creativity research findings", School Science and Mathematics, 62, pp.593~606 (1962)
- Thagard, P., "Conceptual revolutions" (1992), Princeton University Press
- Tsai, C. C., "'Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths': A study of eight graders scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities", Science Education, 83(6), pp.654~674 (1999)
- Watson, R., "Students discussions in practical scientific inquiries", Journal of Science Education, 23(26), pp.25~45 (2004)
- White, Y. B., "Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students", Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), pp.3~118 (1998)
- Zeineddin, A., "Scientific reasoning and epistemological commitments: Coordination of theory and evidence among college science students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), pp.1064~1093 (2010)
- Zimmerman, C., "The development of scientific reasoning skills", Developmental Review, 20, pp.99~149 (2000)
- The development of scientific reasoning skills: What psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science lea, "Zimmerman, C.", National Research Council Committee on Science Learning Kindergarten through Eighth Grade, 1~109 (2005)
