본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학의 본성에 대한 검사 도구를 활용한 연구의 개관과 분석 (1990~2009)

A Review and Analysis of the Studies using Instruments on the Nature of Science(1990~2009)

송진웅|나지연
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2010.08|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제29권 제3호|pp. 292-306

2

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

NOS(the nature of science)NOS instrumentsstandard documents of science education
주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to review the current state and characteristics of instruments used to assess individual understanding of the nature of science (NOS). This study conducted a series of content analyses of the articles published in a total of seven Korean and international journals from 1990 to 2009. A total of 99 research papers and assessment tools were categorized according to their features such as item type, the method of development, philosophical perspectives and others. So, evaluation domains of the instruments were also compared with the features of the NOS endorsed in some standards science education documents internationally well known, such as Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993), National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996). It was found that VNOS was the most frequently used instrument used for the last 20 years. There was a difference between characteristics of instruments used in Korean journals and these in international journal, such as philosophical perspectives, item type. Moreover, the results showed that there were only a few of instruments to ask about ethics of scientists, significance of science process skill and the context. NOS instruments focused only on limited aspects of NOS emphasized by the standard documents.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the current state and characteristics of instruments used to assess individual understanding of the nature of science (NOS). This study conducted a series of content analyses of the articles published in a total of seven Korean and international journals from 1990 to 2009. A total of 99 research papers and assessment tools were categorized according to their features such as item type, the method of development, philosophical perspectives and others. So, evaluation domains of the instruments were also compared with the features of the NOS endorsed in some standards science education documents internationally well known, such as Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993), National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996). It was found that VNOS was the most frequently used instrument used for the last 20 years. There was a difference between characteristics of instruments used in Korean journals and these in international journal, such as philosophical perspectives, item type. Moreover, the results showed that there were only a few of instruments to ask about ethics of scientists, significance of science process skill and the context. NOS instruments focused only on limited aspects of NOS emphasized by the standard documents.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. 교육부, "초등학교 교육 과정 해설" (1998), 대한교과서 주식회사
  2. 김지나, "초등학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 명시적 교수 효과 분석", 초등과학교육, 27(3), pp.261~272 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
  3. 나지연, "과학 연극 수업이 과학 본성에 대한 초등학생의 인식에 미치는 영향", 초등과학교육, 24(5), pp.558~570 (2005)
  4. 노태희, "과학의 본성에 대한 초등학생들의 견해", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(5), pp.882~891 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  5. 소원주, "과학교사의 과학 철학적 관점과 과학 서술 방식이 중학생들의 과학관의 변화에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.1998
  6. 송진웅, "과학철학을 수강하는 대학원생의 과학의 본성에 대한 인식의 변화", 한국과학교육학회지, 12(1), pp.1~9 (1992)
  7. 양일호, "초등 신규 교사의 과학 본성에 대한 신념", 초등과학교육, 24(4), pp.360~379 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
  8. 이은아, "과학의 본성에 대한 학생들의 이해 발달 평가 문항의 개발 : 미국 AAAS의 “과학적 소양을 위한 기분”에 의거하여", 박사, pp.2001
  9. 남정희, "STS에 대한 고등학생들의 견해에 관한 평가도구 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1143~1157 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  10. 장병기, "과학 수업 및 과학의 본성에 대한 초등 교사의 인식", 초등과학교육, 14(1), pp.1~15 (1995)
  11. 장병기, "과학의 본성에 대한 학생의 생각을 조사하기", 초등과학교육, 23(2), pp.159~171 (2004), 한국초등과학교육학회
  12. 조정일, "10학년 과학 탐구 단원의 맥락에서 모델구성과 규칙발견을 통한 명시적 수업이 과학의 본성의 관점에 미치는 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), pp.955~963 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
  13. 조희형, "과학교육의 이론과 실제" (2009), 교육과학사
  14. 조희형, "과학론과 과학교육" (2001), 교육과학사
  15. 최준환, "과학사를 활용한 과학수업 적용을 통한 중학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해의 발달", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.221~239 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  16. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science", Science Education, 88(5), pp.785~810 (2004)
  17. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Improving science teachers’' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature", International Journal of Science Education, 22, pp.665~701 (2000)
  18. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), pp.1057~1095 (2000)
  19. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural", Science Education, 82, pp.417~436 (1998)
  20. Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science, "Abd-El-Khalick, F.", ~, pp.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED472901 (2001)
  21. Abell, S. K., "What is science-preservice elementary teachers conceptions of the nature of science", International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), pp.475~487 (1994)
  22. Aikenhead, G. S., "The development of a new instrument: “Views on Science-Technology-Society” (VOSTS)", Science Education, 76(5), pp.477~491 (1992)
  23. "View On Science-Technology-Society (form CDN.mc.5)"[URL]
  24. Alters, B. J., "Whose nature of science?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), pp.39~55 (1997)
  25. "Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report"[URL]
  26. Bell, R. L., "Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), pp.487~509 (2003)
  27. Bianchini, J. A., "Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teacher: A tale of two researchers", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), pp.177~209 (2000)
  28. Chun, S. J., "An examination of the relation among science teaching actions, beliefs, and knowledge of the nature of science", 박사, pp.2000
  29. Dhingra, K., "Thinking about television science: How students understand the nature of science from different program genres", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), pp.234~256 (2003)
  30. Driver, R., "Young people’s images of science" (1996), Open University Press
  31. Good, R., "Nature-of-science literacy in benchmarks and standards: Post-Modern", Relativist or Modern, Science & Education, pp.2001, 10[DOI]
  32. Gustafson, B. J., "Elementary preservice teachers : constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science and the nature of science", International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), pp.589~605 (1995)
  33. Hipkins, R., "Teaching the ‘nature of science’: modest adaptations or radical reconceptions?", International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), pp.243~254 (2005)
  34. Irwin, A. R., "Historical case studies : Teaching the nature of science in context", Science Education, 84(1), pp.5~26 (2000)
  35. Kang, S., "Examining students’' views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders", Science Education, 89(2), pp.314~334 (2004)
  36. Khishfe, R., "Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), pp.395~418 (2006)
  37. Koulaidis, V., "Science teacher' philosophical assumptions: how well do we understand them?", International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), pp.273~283 (1995)
  38. Leach, J., "A study of progression in learning about 'the nature of science' : Issues of conceptualisation and methodology", International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), pp.147~166 (1997)
  39. Lederman, N. G., "Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change", Science Education, 74(2), pp.225~239 (1990)
  40. Lederman, N. G., "Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.331~359 (1992)
  41. Lederman, N. G., "Nature of science: Past, present, and future. in: Handbook of research on science education" (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  42. Lederman, N. G., "Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.497~521 (2002)
  43. Lederman, N. G., "Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments?", Science & Education, 7, pp.595~615 (1998)
  44. Lin, H., "Promoting preservice chemistry teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), pp.773~792 (2002)
  45. McComas, W. F., "The nature of science in international science educational standards documents. in: The nature of science in science education, rationales and strategies", pp.41~52 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  46. Meichtry, Y. J., "Influencing student understanding of the nature of science : Data from a case of curriculum development", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.389~407 (1992)
  47. Meichtry, Y. J., "The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), pp.429~443 (1993)
  48. Millar, R., "Beyond 2000: Science education for the future" (1998), King's College London
  49. Moss, D. M., "Examining student conceptions of the nature of science", International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), pp.771~790 (2001)
  50. Niaz, M., "Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers' understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies", Science & Education, 18(1), pp.43~65 (2009)
  51. Nott, M., "Your nature of science profile: an activity for science teachers", School Science Review, 75(270), pp.109~112 (1993)
  52. Palmquist, B. C., "Preservice teachers' view of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), pp.595~615 (1997)
  53. Rubba, P. A., "Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature os scientific knowledge", Science & Education, 62(4), pp.449~458 (1978)
  54. Schwartz, R. S., "What scientists say : Scientists’' views of nature of science and relation to science context", International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), pp.727~771 (2008)
  55. Solomon, J., "Large-scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science", Science Education, 80(5), pp.493~508 (1996)
  56. Waters-Adams, S., "The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning", International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), pp.919~944 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

교육과정 개정에 따른 과학의 본성 수준 및 반영정도 탐색: 7차 및 2009 개정교육과정사례 분석박영신, 이정원, 정다혜대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2016 · 제9권 제2호초등학생용 과학의 본성 검사 도구 개발 및 타당성 검토박재용, 박재현한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2022 · 제41권 제4호과학의 본성 관련 국내 과학교육 연구 동향 분석이나현, 정영란, 황신영교과교육연구소 · 교과교육학연구2021 · 제25권 제3호Korean Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding about the Nature of Science (NOS)남정희, Eulsun Seung, Lynn A. Bryan한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2009 · 제29권 제3호중학교 과학영재들의 과학의 본성에 대한 인식 분석박은이, 홍훈기한국영재학회 · 영재교육연구2011 · 제21권 제2호Discussions for linking the Nature of Science (NOS) with Scientific Inquiry박종원한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2008 · 제28권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

초등 교사의 과학 교육 과정의 구성에 대한 인식과 과학의 본성에 대한 관점과의 상관권성기, 김명호, 남일균pp. 243-251리더십 향상을 위한 초등과학 영재 교수 학습 프로그램의 효과장은정, 전영석pp. 252-261초등학교 과학과 자유탐구 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 분석신현화, 김효남pp. 262-276초등학생의 인지 수준에 따른 과학의 본성에 대한 명시적 교수 효과 분석방미정, 김효남pp. 277-291초등학교 과학 수업에서 학생들의 수행 목표 지향성 수준에 따른 협동 학습의 효과강석진, 김연실, 고한중pp. 307-315
원문 보기