본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등교사와 예비초등교사의 과학평가 실태와 지향

Elementary School Teachers’ and Preservice Elementary School Teachers’ Actual and Preferred Types of Science Assessment

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

In this study, we investigated elementary and preservice elementary school teachers’ actual and preferred types of science assessment focusing on the purpose and the method of assessment. Participants were 75 elementary school teachers and 93 preservice elementary school teachers. The questionnaire adopted from previous relevant studies was administerd in order to examine the types of assessment which the teachers have actually implemented and the preferred types of assessment for hypothetical situations known as the prototypical examples of constructivist assessment. The results revealed that most teachers and preservice teachers tend to possess the summative-oriented purpose of assessment. An affective assessment purpose focused on evaluating students’ interest, attitude, and curiosity toward science was newly identified in this study. In analyzing teachers’ responses from the viewpoint of the method of science assessment, responses of an informal mode such as observation and portfolio were noticeable. However, most of them were found to correspond to the traditional summative- oriented purpose of assessment. For prototypical constuctivist assessment situations, teachers and preservice teachers were found to prefer the performance and the informal modes than the measurement mode of the assessment methods, whereas their purposes of the assessment were not found to be constructivist.

Abstract

In this study, we investigated elementary and preservice elementary school teachers’ actual and preferred types of science assessment focusing on the purpose and the method of assessment. Participants were 75 elementary school teachers and 93 preservice elementary school teachers. The questionnaire adopted from previous relevant studies was administerd in order to examine the types of assessment which the teachers have actually implemented and the preferred types of assessment for hypothetical situations known as the prototypical examples of constructivist assessment. The results revealed that most teachers and preservice teachers tend to possess the summative-oriented purpose of assessment. An affective assessment purpose focused on evaluating students’ interest, attitude, and curiosity toward science was newly identified in this study. In analyzing teachers’ responses from the viewpoint of the method of science assessment, responses of an informal mode such as observation and portfolio were noticeable. However, most of them were found to correspond to the traditional summative- oriented purpose of assessment. For prototypical constuctivist assessment situations, teachers and preservice teachers were found to prefer the performance and the informal modes than the measurement mode of the assessment methods, whereas their purposes of the assessment were not found to be constructivist.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 강대중, "초등학교 교사들의 형성평가에 대한 인식 및 실태 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 14(2), pp.27~43 (2014), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  2. 강훈식, "초등학교 교사의 과학 평가 전문성에 대한 자가진단 내용 분석", 초등과학교육, 34(2), pp.153~163 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  3. 고민석, "초등학교 교사의 탐구에 대한 신념과 과학과 수행평가의 실제", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(2), pp.124~135 (2013), 대한지구과학교육학회
  4. 김난옥, "우리나라 학생평가 실태 연구: PISA 2015 참여국과의 국제비교를 중심으로", 교육과정평가연구, 22(3), pp.173~198 (2019), 한국교육과정평가원[DOI]
  5. 김난옥, "교사의 특성과 피드백이 초등학생의 정의적, 인지적 성취에 미치는 영향", 교육과정평가연구, 21(2), pp.129~151 (2018), 한국교육과정평가원[DOI]
  6. 김성훈, "예비교사를 위한 교육평가" (2018), 학지사
  7. 김송자, "초등학교 수학과 수행평가 실천에 관한 연구 - 자기평가.동료평가.관찰평가를 중심으로 -", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 10(1), pp.67~87 (2006), 한국초등수학교육학회
  8. 김인숙, "형성평가시스템 활용을 통한 단위학교의 형성평가 지원 방안", 교육과정평가연구, 21(3), pp.181~199 (2018), 한국교육과정평가원[DOI]
  9. 김진규, "교사 학습공동체 활용 평가연수의 실천 전략", 교육평가연구, 22(4), pp.939~959 (2009), 한국교육평가학회
  10. 김진규, "형성평가 101가지 기법" (2013), 교육과학사
  11. 2012, , ~
  12. 맞춤형 교육 지원을 위한 형성평가 체제 도입(I): 온․오프라인 형성평가 시스템 설계, "김희경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2014-9 (2014)
  13. 남승인, "관찰을 통한 수행능력 평가 방안", 수학교육논문집, 8, pp.65~76 (1999)
  14. 노태희, "중등 과학교사의 과학 평가 실태와 지향", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), pp.725~733 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  15. 민희정, "과학교사의 학생평가 실태분석 및 교사연수를 통한 평가전문성 모델 개발", 박사, 화학교육전공, pp.2012
  16. 박정, "초등 예비교사의 학생평가 전문성 분석", 교육평가연구, 26(1), pp.15~33 (2013), 한국교육평가학회
  17. 박지현, "학교수준 학생평가 운영 실태 및 인식 조사", 교육평가연구, 30(1), pp.29~52 (2017), 한국교육평가학회
  18. 백순근, "수행평가의 원리" (2000), 교육과학사
  19. 손원숙, "교사의 내·외적 요인과 교실평가 간의 구조적 관계: 한국, 싱가포르 및 핀란드 비교", 교육평가연구, 28(2), pp.601~622 (2015), 한국교육평가학회
  20. 성태제, "2020 한국 초중등교육의 향방과 과제" (2013), 학지사
  21. 성태제, "형성평가의 재인식에 따른 교사와 학교교육의 변화를 위한 제언", 교육평가연구, 27(3), pp.597~615 (2014), 한국교육평가학회
  22. 신정윤, "과학과 수행평가의 문제점과 개선 방향", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 7(1), pp.873~883 (2017), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  23. 신정윤, "초등학교 교사들의 과학과수행평가 실시 현황 및 요구 분석", 청람과학교육연구논총, 22(2), pp.18~29 (2016)
  24. 정은영, "우리나라 초·중·고등학교 과학과의 평가 실태", 과학교육연구지, 38(1), pp.168~181 (2014), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
  25. Abell, S. K., "The professional knowledge base of science teaching", pp.205~221 (2011), Springer
  26. Birenbaum, M., "International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning : Implications for policy and practice", Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), pp.117~140 (2015)
  27. Butler, S. M., "A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning" (2006), Jossey-Bass
  28. Davis, D. S., "A self-regulated learning perspective on middle grades classroom assessment", The Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), pp.202~215 (2011)
  29. Earl, L. M., "Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning" (2003), Corwin Press
  30. Falk, A., "Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science : Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge", Science Education, 96(2), pp.265~290 (2012)
  31. Istance, D., "The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice", pp.317~388 (2010), OECD Publishing
  32. McMillan, J. H., "교실평가의 원리와 실제: 기준참조수업과의 연계" (2015), 교육과학사
  33. Siegel, M., "Preparing for the plunge : Preservice teachers’ assessment literacy", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), pp.371~391 (2011)
  34. Thomas, L., "Elementary teachers’ formative evaluation practices in an era of curricular reform in Quebec, Canada", Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), pp.381~398 (2011)
  35. Wang, J. -R., "Preservice teachers’ initial conceptions about assessment of science learning : The coherence with their views of learning science", Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), pp.522~529 (2010)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)